BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
22 March 2024 Life History of the Andean Condor in Ecuador
Juan Sebastián Restrepo-Cardona, Fabricio Narváez, Sebastián Kohn, Rubén Pineida, Félix Hernán Vargas
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Background and Research Aims: Little information exists on the breeding behavior of the Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus). Its global population, estimated at 6700 adult individuals, is declining throughout its distribution range. With less than 150 condors, the Endangered condor population in Ecuador is of conservation concern. This study aimed to analyze the breeding behavior of wild-born Andean Condors in Ecuador. Methods: Between 2009 and 2021, we monitored 22 egg-laying attempts in eight Andean Condor nests, evaluated the parental care of three breeding pairs of condors and recorded the species' interactions with other raptors and mammals during the nestling-rearing season, and examined the breeding success of an Andean Condor pair during a decade of monitoring. Results: Our breeding records indicated that Andean Condor lay eggs throughout the year, and 16 nestlings spent between six and 10 months in the nest before making their first flights. We found differences in the length of time that the parents remain with the nestling, and described agonistic encounters between condors and other raptors and a Spectacled Bear (Tremarctos ornatus) in the condor nesting areas. The breeding success of the monitored condor pair was 0.88 nestlings per clutch, and the female laid an egg on average every 15 months. Conclusion: Considering the small size of the Andean Condor population in Ecuador, studies on the breeding behavior of wild-born condors are a high research priority to assess population trends and prevent extinction. Specifically, we recommend further research on parental care, breeding success, nestling survivorship, and nesting phenology. Implications for Conservation: Beyond the importance of the protected area system, strategic planning of key areas for the maintenance of condor populations in the northern Andes must encompass the evaluation of new potential protected areas that offer direct benefits to these birds. These should include nesting sites in human-dominated landscapes such as rural Andean areas.

Introduction

Little information is available on the breeding biology of New World vultures (Cathartidae), which restricts the development of efficient conservation actions (Santangeli et al., 2022). One such species is the Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus), inhabiting paramos and montane forests throughout the Andes (Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001; Lambertucci, 2007; Plaza & Lambertucci 2020). Its global population does not exceed 6700 adult individuals, and it is in decline throughout its distribution range and, therefore listed as Vulnerable (Birdlife International, 2023). However, its conservation status is of most concern in Ecuador, where its total population is less than 150 individuals (Naveda-Rodríguez et al., 2016; Vargas et al., 2018a) and isolated from the populations in Colombia and Perú (Padró et al., 2023). The species is listed as Endangered at the national level (Freile et al., 2019).

The Andean Condor is the only vulture species displaying sexual dimorphism, allowing reliable comparisons of males and females providing parental care (Lambertucci & Mastrantuoni 2008). Male Andean Condors are larger than females. Males also have a large comb which increases in size with age, whereas females completely lack a crest (Houston et al., 2020). The information available about its breeding behavior comes from observations of a few pairs of Andean Condors in their nests, mostly in the south of their range (e.g., Lambertucci & Mastrantuoni 2008; Sáenz-Jiménez et al., 2016; Restrepo-Cardona et al., 2018). The species nests in rocky escarpments, although nests are also found in cliffs over water and caves at ground level (Lambertucci, 2007; Lambertucci & Speziale 2009). Females of Andean Condors lay a single egg, an event that may occur every two years. Both adults incubate the egg for approximately 60 days and then feed the nestling for many months. The nestlings remain in or near the nests for approximately 15 months (Lambertucci & Mastrantuoni 2008).

Because of the latitudinal extent of the Andean Condor's range, egg-laying dates can vary markedly from Colombia to southern Chile (McGahan, 1972). In the northern Andes, egg-laying was reported between January and February (Köster, 1997) in Ecuador, between February and April by Sáenz-Jiménez et al. (2016), and between October and December by Restrepo-Cardona et al. (2018) in Colombia. However, towards the southern Andes in Argentina and Chile, the egg-laying of condors occurs between August and December (McGahan, 1972; Lambertucci & Mastrantuoni 2008; Gargiulo, 2014). Furthermore, there are seasonal differences in the use of communal roosts by Andean Condor populations in Tropical and subtropical Andean areas (Lambertucci, 2010; Márquez-Alvis et al., 2023), and the feeding habits of the species vary along a ∼2500 km latitudinal gradient of human-modified habitats and more pristine ecosystems (Duclos et al. 2020).

Although there has been a recent increase in the availability of scientific information on the population biology of the Andean Condor, specific knowledge of its breeding behavior remains scarce (Plaza & Lambertucci 2020). This study aimed to (1) analyze the timing of egg-laying in wild-born Andean Condors, (2) evaluate the parental care of three pairs of condors and provide a record of the species' interactions with other raptors and mammals during the nestling-rearing season, and (3) examine the breeding success of an Andean Condor pair in a 10-year period in Ecuador.

Materials and Methods

Study Area

The study was carried out in eight wild-born Andean Condor nests located on rocky escarpments in the Andean region of Ecuador. Six nests were located in the province of Pichincha, in Itulcachi at 2,999 m a.s.l. (0°18'S, 78°18'W) in the middle basin of the Río Itulcachi and El Tablón at 3,020 m a.s.l. (0°16'S, 78°18'W). In the Peñón del Isco at 3,575 m a.s.l. (0°27'S, 78°19'W) and Peñón del Cóndor at 3,934 m a.s.l. (0°27'S, 78°16'W). Both sites are in the Reserva Ecologica Chakana of the Fundación Jocotoco. In Chitachaca at 3,306 m a.s.l. (0°2'S, 78°6'W) and Caleras at 3,312 m a.s.l. (0°3'S, 78°4'W), located in the middle and upper basins of the Río Chitachaca, respectively. One nest was located in Cotopaxi province, in Barrancas at 4,180 m a.s.l. (0°44'S, 78°24'W), and another was in the Azuay province, in the Reserva Municipal Cóndor Sur at 1,637 m a.s.l. (3°26'S, 79°11'W), located in the middle basin of the Río León. The distance between the nests in Itulcachi and El Tablón is 2.94 km, between the nests in Peñón del Isco and Peñón del Cóndor is 4.52 km, and between the nests in Chitachaca and Caleras is 3.12 km (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Map of the locations of eight wild-born Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) nests in the Andean region of Ecuador. (1) Itulcachi, (2) El Tablón, (3) Peñón del Isco, (4) Peñón del Cóndor, (5) Chitachaca, (6) Caleras, (7) Barrancas, and (8) Río León.

10.1177_19400829241238005-fig1.tif

The nest areas comprised various landscapes of Andean paramos and Andean Mountain Forests. Nests in Caleras, Barrancas, Peñón del Isco, and Peñón del Cóndor were located in the paramo ecosystem. Paramo is a grassland-shrubland ecosystem found above 3000 m a.s.l. in areas that are humid year-round, with > 3000 mm of annual precipitation (Rundel, 1994). Nests in El Tablón, Itulcachi, Chitachaca, and Río León were located in the ecotone between the upper limit of the Andean Mountain Forests and the paramo. The Andean Mountain Forests in Ecuador have been extensively degraded due to human disturbance such as cattle ranching and agriculture (Sierra et al., 2021).

Methodology

To understand the timing of the breeding of wild-born Andean Condors in Ecuador, we gathered information about egg-laying, incubation, and nestling-rearing attempts. This information was compiled from non-systematic observations of condor nests that the authors and collaborators of this study monitored between 2009 and 2021.

To describe the Andean Condor parental care, each nest site was considered as the central point within an area of 1 km2 surrounding it, and we recorded the time that each breeding adult remained within this area. Upon detection of an egg in a nest, the time each adult spent incubating was recorded. When a nestling was detected, the time each adult spent with the nestling and time spent feeding the nestling were recorded. Additionally, agonistic encounters between condors, other raptor species, and large mammals were recorded (Lambertucci & Mastrantuoni 2008; Restrepo-Cardona et al., 2018).

Between November and December 2017 and between June 2021 and February 2022 at El Tablón, between January and March 2021 at Itulcachi, and between July and September 2021 at Chitachaca, we conducted systematic observations at the three nests. Nests were observed between 0600 and 1814 h at El Tablón in 2017 (five visits/month) and between 0800 and 1630 h between 2021 and 2022 (three visits/month), between 0555 and 1825 h at Itulcachi (six visits/month), and between 0800 and 1630 h at Chitachaca (five visits/month). We used binoculars (10 x 42 and 10 x 50), telescopes (20-60 x 60 and 20-60 x 65), and cameras to observe from elevated points between 50 and 300 m horizontal distance from each nest.

To analyze the breeding success of the Andean Condor pair at Peñón del Isco, the nest was monitored by direct observations over 10 nesting attempts from November 2011 to November 2021. The nest was visited two days every week and observed for 12 hours. We calculated the breeding success (number of nestlings hatched/total number of eggs laid), the total number of nestlings that fledged, and the permanence in the nest of these nestlings before making their first flights (Villegas-Davies et al., 2018). We did not record behaviors such as mating, courtship displays, and feather cleaning.

Data Analysis

To assess whether there were significant differences in the number of hours each adult Andean Condor remained in the nest incubating the egg, or accompanying or feeding the nestling, we performed Chi-square tests of independence using R Project version 2.1 (R Core Team, 2020). Statistical significance across all analyses was considered when P < 0.05. We did not perform quantitative analyses of egg-laying, incubation, and nestling-rearing dates in the nest, nor did we make comparisons of parental care between condor pairs due to a lack of systematic data.

Results

Nesting Attempts and Timing of Egg-Laying

Between 2009 and 2021, we compiled records of 22 condor nesting attempts in eight sites in Ecuador. We found that wild-born Andean Condors laid eggs throughout the year. Our data show the rearing of 19 Andean Condor nestlings in eight nests. Of these, 16 nestlings remained in the nests between six and 10 months before making their first flights. One nestling fell from the nest and died. Another nestling fell from the nest and lost its tail to an attack by free-ranging dogs, and another fell from the nest and broke its leg. In addition, three eggs failed to hatch. We found that nine male nestlings remained in the nest for between seven and 10 months and seven female nestlings were in the nest between six and eight months before making their first flights (Table 1).

Table 1.

Records of egg-laying, incubation, and rearing of nestlings in eight wild-born Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) nests in Ecuador, chronologically ordered between 2009 and 2021.

10.1177_19400829241238005-table1.tif

Incubation and Rearing of the Nestling

We recorded the presence of a single egg when we began observations at the Itulcachi nest in January 2017, and at El Tablón nest in November 2017 and June 2021. At Chitachaca, in July 2021, we observed a female nestling of approximately five months of age.

At the Itulcachi nest, in 2017, in over 211.48 h of observations carried out between January 31st and March 23rd, the female remained in the nest incubating the egg 35.97% of the time (76.07 h), while the male did so for 32.89% of the time (69.56 h) (χ2 = 0.29, df = 1, P = 0.59). After March, the condors did not continue incubation and the egg did not hatch.

At El Tablón nest, in 2017, during 11.01 h of observation between November 7th and 15th, the female incubated the egg for 31.51% of the time (3.47 h), while the male did so for 28.51% of the time (3.14 h) (χ2 = 0.01, df = 1, P = 0.90). On November 15th, we observed the hatching of a male nestling. During 81.48 h of observation between November 15th and December 9th, the female was with the nestling in the nest for 39.88% of the time (32.50 h) and the male for 29.55% of the time (24.08 h) (χ2 = 1.27, df = 1, P = 0.25). The female fed the nestling for 0.62% of the time (0.51 h), while the male fed the nestling for 0.55% of the time (0.45 h) (χ2 = 0.01, df = 1, P = 0.91). On December 10th, the nestling fell out of the nest and died.

Again at El Tablón nest, in 2021, during 28.12 h of observation between June 18th and July 9th, the male incubated the egg for 40.29% of the time (11.33 h) and the female for 35.63% of the time (10.02 h) (χ2 = 0.07, df = 1, P = 0.77). Whereas, during 90.19 h of observation between July 23rd, 2021, and January 7th, 2022, the male stayed for longer with the nestling in the nest (11.47 h, 12.71%) compared to the female (3.41 h, 3.78%) (χ2 = 4.32, df = 1, P = 0.03). The male fed the nestling for 0.58% of the time (0.53 h) and the female for 0.05% of the time (0.05 h) (χ2 = 0.39, df = 1, P = 0.52).

At the Chitachaca nest, in 2021, over 78.10 h of observation between July 19th and September 1st, the female was in the nest for 10.38% of the time (8.11 h), and the male was in the nest for 5.59% of the time (4.37 h) (χ2 = 1.12, df = 1, P = 0.28). The female fed the nestling for 0.51% of the time (0.40 h), while the male was not observed feeding the nestling.

Territorial Defense

At El Tablón, in 2021, when the nest had an egg, on one occasion the female displaced a pair of Black Vultures (Coragyps atratus), and on another occasion, it displaced a juvenile male condor from the vicinity. In 2017, when there was a nestling in the nest, on one occasion the condor pair displaced a Black-Chested Buzzard-Eagle (Geranoaetus melanoleucus). Whereas between 2021 and 2022, during the nestling period, the female displaced an adult female condor, a Black Vulture pair and a Spectacled Bear (Tremarctos ornatus) on one occasion, respectively. The Spectacled Bear came within three meters of the nest entrance. While on one occasion, the male displaced another adult female condor from the vicinity. At the Itulcachi and Chitachaca nests, no agonistic encounters were recorded between the condors and other species entering the 1km2 nesting area.

Breeding Success

The breeding success of the Andean Condor pair at Peñón del Isco was 0.88 nestlings per clutch. The female laid an egg on average every 15 months. Three nests were reused two times and two other nests were used once. All the nestlings (seven birds) fledged from the nest and an egg failed to hatch. However, the nestling that hatched in 2015 fell from the nest while attempting its first flight. It was rescued, marked with wing band No. 12 and a satellite transmitter, and was recorded surviving, subsequently. This nestling returned to the natal site on one occasion in March 2017, and there it was fed by the parents that were rearing another nestling inside the nest. Furthermore, the time that Andean Condor nestlings remained in the nest before making their first flight ranged from six to eight months (Table 1).

Discussion

We present records of 22 Andean Condor egg-laying attempts between 2009 and 2021 in eight nests, which indicate that wild-born condor egg-laying occurs throughout the year in Ecuador. Our data on the breeding behavior of condors show that there could be differences in the lengths of time that the parents remain with the nestling in the nest, as well as evidence presented of agonistic encounters between condors and other condors, raptor species, and a Spectacled Bear in the nesting areas. We also highlight that the breeding success of the Andean Condor pair at Peñón del Isco was 0.88 nestlings per clutch and that the female laid an egg on average every 15 months (Table 1).

Our breeding records indicate that Andean Condor lay eggs throughout the year (Table 1), in both rainy (between March and April and between October and November) and dry (between December and February and between May and September) periods (Albuja et al., 2012). There is evidence of egg-laying and incubation in subtropical Andes occurring between August and December (McGahan, 1972; Lambertucci & Mastrantuoni 2008; Gargiulo, 2014). Therefore, we assume that latitude affects Andean Condor egg-laying and hatching time through the species' distribution range. Harsh winter conditions that might harm an egg or nestling are absent in equatorial areas, but local variation in food availability may affect the timing of reproduction (McGahan, 1972; Wallace & Temple 1988). Furthermore, climatic factors, such as precipitation, temperature, and humidity, can influence the nesting phenology of birds (Cooper et al., 2005). Precipitation, temperature, and seasonality may affect the use of communal roost by Andean Condors in Tropical and subtropical areas (Lambertucci, 2010; Márquez-Alvis et al., 2023). All of these are factors that we did not measure in our study. It is therefore important to conduct research to evaluate the influence of climate variability and food availability on the nesting phenology and feeding habits of the Ecuadorian Andean Condor population and thus contribute to the knowledge about the species' life history.

We found that, at El Tablón in November 2017 and between June and July 2021, at Itulcachi between January and March 2017, and at Chitachaca between July and September 2021, both Andean Condor parents incubated the eggs, or cared for or fed the nestling for a similar amount of time. However, at El Tablón between July 2021 and January 2022, the male remained in the nest with the nestling for more time than the female. Similarly, in Argentina, during the nesting period, the male visited the nest site more often, stayed for longer periods, interacted with the nestling, and brought food more frequently than the female (Lambertucci & Mastrantuoni 2008). Observations at a condor nest in Papallacta, Napo province in Ecuador, revealed that the male fed the chick more often than the female (Köster 1997). The social hierarchies that structure Andean Condor populations may affect patterns of breeding behavior. Adult male condors are known to restrict access of females and juveniles to food but also may displace females to conduct incubation (Pavez & Tala 1995; Donázar et al., 1999; Lambertucci & Mastrantuoni 2008).

Our observations provide evidence of interspecific interactions between wild-born Andean Condors and other raptor and mammal species in their nesting areas in Ecuador. Similarly, in Argentina, wild-born Andean Condors defended their territory against condors and other raptors such as the Black Vulture, Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura), and Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) (Lambertucci & Mastrantuoni 2008). Furthermore, in a nest of captive-born and reintroduced condors in Colombia, interactions between condors, Black-chested Buzzard-Eagles, and Black Vultures were reported by Restrepo-Cardona et al. (2018). However, we highlight our observation of a female Andean Condor displacing a Spectacled Bear near the nest at El Tablón in 2021. To our knowledge, this is the first documented record of such an agonistic encounter between these two threatened species. The lack of records of agonistic interaction between Andean Condors and other species at the Itulcachi and Chitachaca nests could be due to the lower sampling effort or to their acceptance of the presence of these species.

The time that 16 Andean Condor nestlings remained in the nests before making their first flight ranged from six to 10 months (Table 1). This finding supports those of Lambertucci and Mastrantuoni (2008) and Gargiulo (2014) in Argentina, suggesting that it may be a typical parameter of the life history of the species. Furthermore, the breeding success of a condor pair during a decade of monitoring at Peñón del Isco was 0.88 nestlings per clutch. There is limited information documented about wild-born Andean Condors breeding success (Houston et al., 2020; Santangeli et al., 2022). Similar to our results, in the provinces of Cotopaxi, Napo, and Pichincha, condor breeding success was 0.75 chicks per nest where there were three successes and one failure in both 2018 and 2019 (Sánchez & Gallo-Viracocha 2023); however, these authors do not provide information about the specific sites where these breeding events were recorded or data on the dates these cases occurred. Likewise, we did not include in our analysis nine breeding events reported by Sánchez & Gallo-Viracocha (2023) because these data were obtained through interviews with people, and our records are derived from direct observation between 2009 and 2021.

Implications for Conservation

It is of concern that, of the eight Andean Condor nests analyzed in this study, none are located within the National System of Protected Areas of Ecuador, and only three nests are located within private or local protected areas. The nests at Peñón del Isco and Peñón del Cóndor are in the Reserva Ecológica Chakana, and the nest in the middle basin of the Río León is located within the Municipal Reserve Cóndor Sur. We observed that a nestling fell out of the nest and lost its tail after being attacked by free-ranging dogs; the bird is now in captivity (Restrepo-Cardona et al., 2022). Furthermore, between 2018 and 2019, at El Tablón, the parents raised the nestling while heavy machinery was being used to construct a road close to the nest (<40 m). The assessment of human threats during the breeding period is a fundamental component of Andean Condor conservation (Lambertucci & Speziale 2009). Beyond the importance of the protected area system, strategic planning of key areas for the maintenance of condor populations in the northern Andes must encompass the evaluation of new potential protected areas that offer direct benefits to these birds. These should include nesting and breeding sites in human-dominated landscapes such as the rural Andean areas (Restrepo-Cardona et al., 2018).

Necessary measures for Andean Condor conservation must comprise the development of systematic studies of a higher number of nests and should, in the long term, include the parental care, breeding success, nestling survivorship, and nesting phenology of the species in the northern Andes, where its reduced populations are more vulnerable to local extinction due to anthropogenic threats (Naveda-Rodríguez et al., 2016; Vargas et al. 2018a; Restrepo-Cardona et al., 2022; Padró et al., 2023). Studies of the breeding behavior of wild-born Andean Condors are a high research priority to assess population trends and prevent extinction. A better understanding of the patterns of Andean Condor breeding behavior and population demography will inform the implementation of effective actions for the conservation of this iconic species.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Fundación Jocotoco, the companies SUDINCO and NOVOPAN, and P. Escobar, for granting access to their respective properties to study the pairs of condors. We also thank V. Ushiña and V. Amoguimba for their help with the fieldwork, F. Cardozo for sharing information about the condors of the Río León. We thank the Ministerio del Ambiente de Ecuador (MAE/MAATE) for granting Research permits: 005-12- IC-FAU-DNB/MA; MAE-DNB-CM-2015-0010; 012-18-IC-FAU-DNB/MA; 022-19-IC-FAU-DNB/MA; MAAE-ARSFC-2020-0765, MAAE-ARSFC-2022-2093. This research was funded by The Peregrine Fund, Fundacion Condor Andino – Ecuador, FLORSANI, Parque Cóndor, The Butler Foundation, Barbara Butler, Virginia Safari Parks, Wolf Creek Charitable Foundation, and G. García. We also thank the useful comments by Associate Editor and two anonymous reviewers whose contributions improved content of this paper.

© The Author(s) 2024

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

1.

Albuja , L. , Almendáriz , A. , Barriga , R. , Montalvo , L. , Cáceres , F. , & Román , J. (2012). Fauna de Vertebrados del Ecuador. Quito: Escuela Politécnica Nacional. Google Scholar

2.

BirdLife International . (2023). Species factsheet: Vultur gryphus. Retrieved from https://www.birdlife.org on 24/08/2023. Google Scholar

3.

Cooper , C. B. , Hochachka , W. M. , Butcher , G. , & Dhondt , A. A. (2005). Seasonal and latitudinal trends in clutch size: Thermal constraints during laying and incubation. Ecology, 86, 2018–2031.  https://doi.org/10.1890/03-8028 Google Scholar

4.

Donázar , J. A. , Travaini , A. , Cevallos , O. , Rodríguez , A. , Delibes , M. , & Hiraldo , F. (1999). Effects of sex-associated competitive asymmetries on foraging group structure and despotic distribution in Andean Condors. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45, 55–65. Google Scholar

5.

Duclos , M. , Sabat , P. , Newsome , S. D. , Pavez , E. F. , Galbán-Malagón , C. , Jaksic , F. M. , & Quirici , V. (2020). Latitudinal patterns in the diet of Andean condor (Vultur gryphus) in Chile: contrasting environments influencing feeding behavior. Science of the Total Environment, 741, 140220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140220 Google Scholar

6.

Ferguson-Lees , J. , & Christie , D. A. (2001). Raptors of the world. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. Google Scholar

7.

Freile , J. F. , Santander , T. G. , Jiménez-Uzcátegui , G. , Carrasco , L. , Cisneros-Heredia , D. F. , Guevara , E. A. , Sánchez-Nivicela , M. , & Tinoco , B. A. (2019). Lista roja de las aves del Ecuador. In Quito: Ministerio del Ambiente, Aves y Conservación, Comité Ecuatoriano de Registros Ornitológicos, Fundación Charles Darwin, Universidad del Azuay, Red Aves Ecuador y Universidad San Francisco de Quito. Google Scholar

8.

Gargiulo , C. (2014). El cóndor andino en las sierras centrales de Argentina: Distribución, abundancia y nidificación. Córdoba: ECOVAL Editorial. Google Scholar

9.

Houston , D. , Kirwan , G. M. , Christie , D. A. , & Sharpe , C. J. (2020). Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus), version 1.0. In del Hoyo , J. , Elliott , A. , Sargatal , J. , Christie , D. A. , & de Juana , E. , (Eds.), Birds of the World. NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.  https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.andcon1.01 Google Scholar

10.

Köster , F. (1997). Los Cóndores de Papallacta. In Quito: Instituto Ecuatoriano Forestal y de Áreas Naturales y Vida Silvestre, Empresa Municipal de Agua Potable y Alcantarillado de Quito, Fundación Rumicocha y Fundación Ornitológica del Ecuador. Google Scholar

11.

Lambertucci , S. A. (2007). Biología y Conservación del Cóndor Andino (Vultur gryphus) en Argentina. El Hornero, 22, 149–158.  https://doi.org/10.56178/eh.v22i2.760 Google Scholar

12.

Lambertucci , S. A. (2010). Size and spatio-temporal variations of the Andean condor Vultur gryphus population in north-west Patagonia, Argentina: communal roosts and conservation. Oryx, 44, 441–447.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605310000451 Google Scholar

13.

Lambertucci , S. A. , & Mastrantuoni , O. A. (2008). Breeding behavior of a pair of free-living Andean condors. Journal of Field Ornithology, 79, 147–151.  https://www.jstor.org/stable/27715253 Google Scholar

14.

Lambertucci , S. A. , & Speziale , K. (2009). Some possible anthropogenic threats to breeding Andean condors (Vultur gryphus). Jornal of Raptor Research, 43, 245–249.  https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-08-108.1 Google Scholar

15.

Márquez-Alvis , S. , Vallejos , L. M. , Paredes-Guerrero , S. , Pollack-Velasquez , L. , & Santos , G. S. (2023). Effects of the environmental conditions and seasonality on a population survey of the Andean condor Vultur gryphus in the tropical Andes. PeerJ, 11, e14763 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14763 Google Scholar

16.

McGahan , J. (1972). Behaviour and ecology of the Andean condor (doctoral Thesis). University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar

17.

Naveda-Rodríguez , A. , Vargas , F. H. , Kohn , S. , & Zapata-Ríos , G. (2016). Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) in Ecuador: Geographic distribution, population size and extinction risk. PloS ONE, 11, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151827 Google Scholar

18.

Narváez , F. (2012). Monitoreo de un nido del cóndor andino en Caleras, cantón Cayambe, provincia de Pichincha: informe técnico para EcoFondo. Quito: Fundación Parque Cóndor. Google Scholar

19.

Padró , J. , Vargas , F. H. , Lambertucci , S. A. , Perrig , P. L. , Pauli , J. N. , Ortega , A. , Kohn , S. , Navarrete , J. , Heredia , S. , Narváez , F. , Andrade-Brito , D. , & Chaves , J. A. (2023). Demographic collapse threatens the long-term persistence of Andean condors in the northern Andes. Biological Conservation, 285, 110217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110217 Google Scholar

20.

Pavez , E. , & Tala , C. (1995). Río Blanco, la herencia de los Glaciares. Santiago: Editorial Antártica. Google Scholar

21.

Plaza , P. I. , & Lambertucci , S. A. (2020). Ecology and conservation of a rare species: What do we know and what may we do to preserve Andean Condors? Biological Conservation, 251, 108782.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108782 Google Scholar

22.

R Core Team . (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Google Scholar

23.

Restrepo-Cardona , J. S. , Parrado , M. A. , Vargas , F. H. , Kohn , S. , Sáenz-Jiménez , F. , Potaufeu , Y. , & Narváez , F. (2022). Anthropogenic threats to the Vulnerable Andean Condor in northern South America. PLoS ONE 17, e0278331.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278331 Google Scholar

24.

Restrepo-Cardona , J. S. , Sáenz-Jiménez , F. , Echeverry-Galvis , M. A. , Betancur , A. , Quintero , A. F. , & López , P. A. (2018). Breeding behavior of a reintroduced pair of Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) in the central Andes of Colombia. Ornitología Neotropical, 29, 129–133.  https://doi.org/10.58843/ornneo.v29i1.233 Google Scholar

25.

Rundel , P.W. (1994). Tropical alpine climates. In Rundel , P.W. , Smith , A. P. , & Meinzer , F. C. , (Eds.), Tropical alpine environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

26.

Sáenz-Jiménez , F. , Parrado-Vargas , M. A. , Pérez-Torres , J. , Sheppard , J. , & Ciri , F. (2016). Andean condor (Vultur gryphus) nesting in northeastern Colombia and differences in laying dates along the Andes. Ornitología Neotropical, 27, 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.58843/ornneo.v27i0.131 Google Scholar

27.

Sánchez , R. , & Gallo-Viracocha , F. (2023). Minimum nest distances, breeding success and use of shared cliffs for Andean Condor Vultur gryphus breeding in Ecuador. Acta Ornithologica, 58, 127–133.  https://doi.org/10.3161/00016454AO2023.58.1.009 Google Scholar

28.

Santangeli , A. , Buechley , E. R. , Mammola , S. , & Lambertucci , S. A. (2022). Priorities for research and action to prevent a New World vulture crisis. Biological Conservation, 270, 109563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109563 Google Scholar

29.

Sierra , R. , Calva , O. , & Guevara , A. (2021). La deforestación en el Ecuador, 1990-2018. Factores promotores y tendencias recientes. In Quito: Ministerio de Ambiente y Agua del Ecuador, Ministerio de Agricultura del Ecuador, en el marco de la implementación del Programa Integral Amazónico de Conservación de Bosques y Producción Sostenible. Google Scholar

30.

Vargas , F. H. (2012). Investigación del cóndor andino con rastreadores satelitales y bandas alares. In Quito: The Peregrine Fund and Grupo Nacional de Trabajo del Cóndor Andino en Ecuador. Google Scholar

31.

Vargas , F. H. , Kohn , S. , Ortega , A. , Arbeláez , E. , Naveda-Rodriguez , A. , Cardoso , F. , & Chaves , J. (2017). Proyecto de investigación y monitoreo ecológico del cóndor andino en Ecuador: informe técnico (2012-2016) para el Ministerio del Ambiente de Ecuador. In Quito: The Peregrine Fund and Grupo Nacional de Trabajo del Cóndor Andino en Ecuador. Google Scholar

32.

Vargas , F. H Narváez , F. , Naveda-Rodríguez , A. , Carrasco , L. , Kohn , S. , Utreras , V. , Zapata-Ríos , G. , & Ron , K. (2018a). Segundo censo nacional del cóndor andino en Ecuador. In Quito: Ministerio del Ambiente, The Peregrine Fund, and Grupo Nacional de Trabajo del Cóndor Andino en Ecuador. Google Scholar

33.

Vargas , F. H. , Narváez , F. , Kohn , S. , & Ortega , A. (2018b). Investigación y monitoreo ecológico del cóndor andino en Ecuador: informe técnico (2017-2018) para el Ministerio del Ambiente de Ecuador. In Quito: The Peregrine Fund and Fundación Cóndor Andino Ecuador. Google Scholar

34.

Vargas , F. H. , Narváez , F. , Kohn , S. , Arbeláez , E. , Ortega , A. , Medina , D. , Romero , J. , Pineida , R. , Araujo , E. , Monar , P. , & Lopez , S. (2019). Investigación y monitoreo ecológico del cóndor andino en Ecuador: informe técnico (2018-2019) para el Ministerio del Ambiente de Ecuador. In Quito: The Peregrine Fund and Fundación Cóndor Andino Ecuador. Google Scholar

35.

Vargas , F. H. , Ortega , A. , Kohn , S. , Carrion , J. M. , & Parish , C. (2013). Investigación y monitoreo ecológico del cóndor andino en Ecuador: informe técnico (2012-2013) para el Ministerio del Ambiente de Ecuador. Quito: The Peregrine Fund and Grupo Nacional de Trabajo del Cóndor Andino en Ecuador. Google Scholar

36.

Villegas-Davies , V. , Floria , P. , & Casaux , R. (2018). Reproducción y alimentación del águila mora (Geranoaetus melanoleucus) en el noroeste de Chubut, Argentina. El Hornero, 33, 113–119.  https://doi.org/10.56178/eh.v33i2.481 Google Scholar

37.

Wallace , M. P. , & Temple , S. A. (1988). Impacts of the 1982-1983 El Nino on population dynamics of Andean condors in Peru. Biotropica, 20, 144–150. Google Scholar
Juan Sebastián Restrepo-Cardona, Fabricio Narváez, Sebastián Kohn, Rubén Pineida, and Félix Hernán Vargas "Life History of the Andean Condor in Ecuador," Tropical Conservation Science 17(1), (22 March 2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/19400829241238005
Received: 4 September 2023; Accepted: 13 February 2024; Published: 22 March 2024
KEYWORDS
agonistic encounter
breeding success
egg-laying
Parental care
vultures
Back to Top