Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
28 February 2025 Molecular phylogeny reveals three new water mite species of the genus Teutonia Koenike, 1889, from Portugal (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Teutoniidae)
Vladimir Pešić, Ekaterina S. Konopleva, Alessio Iannucci, Sónia Ferreira, Elisabeth Stur
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Water mites of the genus Teutonia Koenike, 1889 are often common in cold montane lakes and pools of shaded streams and include the fastest swimmers among the water mites. This study provides the first-time calibrated phylogeny of this genus in Europe. Fossil-calibrated modelling reveals that the most recent common ancestor of the European Teutonia spp. originated in the Oligocene. Phylogenetic analyses show the presence of at least five species-level lineages within European teutoniid mites, with the T. corsicana-clade as the earliest branching lineage. We infer the origin of Teutonia corsicana at 29.0 million years ago, near the Eocene–Oligocene boundary, indicating that this species or its most recent ancestor was already present on the Corsica-Sardinia block when it broke off from the Iberian Peninsula. The remaining Teutonia clades are relatively younger and began their divergence in the early Miocene (ca. 21 million years ago) and continued with individual species throughout the Miocene. Finally, as a result of an integrative taxonomic approach, three species, i.e., T. lusitanica sp. nov., T. herminiana sp. nov. and T. condei sp. nov. are described as new for science, and the presence of T. cometes is for the first time molecularly confirmed for Portugal.

Introduction

The family Teutoniidae Koenike, 1910 comprises two genera, the monotypic Limnolegeria Motaş, 1928, and the widely distributed Teutonia Koenike, 1889. The latter genus, recorded from the Holarctic, comprises two subgenera, the nominate subgenus and Subteutonia Habeeb, 1958 known only from Canada (Smit 2020). Currently, the genus Teutonia in Western Palaearctic encompasses three species, i.e., the widely distributed T. cometes (Koch, 1837), inhabiting cold montane lakes and pools of shaded streams, T. subalpina Thor, 1897, restricted to the far north of Europe (Di Sabatino et al. 2010) and T. corsicana Pešić & Smit, 2022, the latter originally described from Corsica (Pešić & Smit 2022) and recently also reported from Sardinia (Pešić & Goldschmidt 2023). As emphasized by Di Sabatino et al. (2010) probably all species of the genus are characterized by weak sclerotization and consequently palps and legs frequently become distorted or folded, making the verification of the characters states difficult. It seems that some of the Teutonia species which are challenging to separate morphologically, are at least sympatric, even syntopic in some places as shown in this study.

Recently, as the results of recent DNA barcoding initiatives conducted within the framework of the project Biodiversity Genomics Europe (BGE,  https://biodiversitygenomics.eu/), a COI dataset of specimens of the genus Teutonia collected in continental Portugal was formed. The existence of such a dataset provides the opportunity to reconstruct the diversification of the genus Teutonia in Europe based on a time-calibrated phylogeny. Moreover, as a result of an integrative taxonomic approach three species new for science were described, and presence of T. cometes is for the first time molecularly confirmed for Portugal.

Material and Methods

Water mites were collected by hand netting and immediately preserved in 96% ethanol for the purpose of the molecular analyses. The specimens used for the molecular study are listed in Table 1. After DNA extraction, the specimen vouchers were stored in 96% EtOH and morphologically examined. Some of these vouchers were dissected and slide mounted in Faure's medium, while the rest was transferred to Koenike's fluid.

Morphological nomenclature follows Gerecke et al. (2016). The genital acetabula in both sexes and the genital plate in the female were measured on both sides, therefore their dimensions are given as a range of values, rather than a single number. The holotype and paratypes of the new species are deposited in the Naturalis Biodiversity Center in Leiden (RMNH).

All measurements are given in µm. The following abbreviations are used: Ac-1 = first acetabulum; asl = above sea level; Cx-I = first coxae; dL = dorsal length; H = height; I-L-4-6 = fourth-sixth segments of first leg; L = length; Ma (mega-anum) = million years; MRCA = the most recent common ancestor; P-1-P-5 = palp segment 1-5; RMNH = Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden; W = width.

Molecular and DNA barcode analyses

The molecular analysis was conducted at the University of Florence (Florence, Italy). DNA was extracted using a non-destructive protocol. For the methods used for cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene amplification and sequencing see Pešić et al. (2024). Raw reads were demultiplexed using the Pacific Biosciences SMRT Link software. Consensus sequences were generated with the PacBio Amplicon Analysis (pbaa) tool. Primer trimming, translation and stop codon checking were performed using Geneious Prime 2024.0.1.

Consensus sequences were made available in the Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD). Relevant voucher information, photos, and recently generated DNA barcodes are publicly accessible through the Dataset - DS-BGEPL02 (BGE Biodiversity Genomics Europe: Portuguese water mites II - Molecular phylogeny of Teutonia) in BOLD.

In this study DNA was extracted from 26 specimens of the genus Teutonia from Portugal listed in Table 1. For all other species, COI sequence data were taken from Pešić and Smit (2022) and Pešić and Goldschmidt (2023) and downloaded from the respective sequence data archives. In total we used an COI dataset with 47 sequences of Teutonia spp. for phylogenetic analyses.

TABLE 1.

Details on DNA barcoded specimens, including coordinates of sampling sites, the barcode index number (N indicates a new BIN that contains only current sequences) and associated data obtained from BOLD. BOLD data presented here was last accessed on 10th October 2024.

img-z3-2_381.gif

Sequence comparisons were performed using MUSCLE alignment (Edgar 2004). Intra and interspecific genetic distances were calculated based on the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model (Kimura 1980), using MEGA 11 software (Tamura et al. 2021). Codon positions included were 1st+2nd+3rd+Noncoding. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). Additionally, the sequence data were analyzed using the Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) method (Puillandre et al. 2021). We used the online ASAP version ( https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap/asapweb.html) with default settings and K2P distance model.

Phylogenetic analysis

The 3-partitioned phylogeny was based on COI dataset with 47 sequences of Teutonia spp. Representative of Limnolegeria longiseta Motaş, 1928 was used as outgroup. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis was performed using the online server IQ-TREE v1.6.12 (W-IQ-TREE) with automatic identification of the most appropriate evolutionary models (Chernomor et al. 2016) and ultrafast bootstrapping algorithm (UFBoot) with 5000 replicates (Hoang et al. 2017). Models of sequence evolution for each partition calculated through Model Finder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) based on Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were as follows: 1st codon of COI: HKY + G; 2nd codon of COI: K2P + I; and 3rd codon of COI: F81 + I. The same models were used for the Bayesian Inference (BI) phylogenetic analysis, which was performed in MrBayes v3.2.7 (Ronquist et al. 2012) at the San Diego Supercomputer Center through the CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller et al. 2010). The following parameters were implemented: two runs with four Markov chains (three heated and one cold, temperature = 0.2), 5,000,000 generations, and tree sampling every 1000th generation, 10% of trees were discarded as burn-in and the majority rule consensus tree was calculated from the remaining trees. Convergence of the MCMC chains to a stationary distribution was checked visually based on the plotted posterior estimates using an MCMC trace analysis tool (Tracer v1.7; Rambaut et al. 2018) and all ESS values were >300.

Divergence time estimates

For time-calibrated COI phylogeny we used a dataset with 14 mite species. Besides five Teutonia species, representatives of Hydrachnoidea (Hydrachna conjecta Koenike, 1895 and Hydrachna globosa (De Geer, 1778)), Arrenuroidea (Horreolanus orphanus Mitchell, 1955 and Mideopsis roztoczensis Biesiadka & Kowalik, 1979), Hygrobatidae (Hygrobates longipalpis (Hermann, 1804), Hygrobates cyrnusensis Pešić & Smit, 2023 and Hygrobates fluviatilis (Strøm, 1768)) and Erythraeoidea (Lasioerythraeus sp. and Smaris sp.) were included as outgroups. Calculations were performed in BEAST v2.7.3 with a log-normal relaxed clock and Yule speciation process as priors (Bouckaert et al. 2019). We used external mean rate 0.0168 ± 0.0018 of COI dataset with log normal distribution (M=0.0168, S=0.056) calculated for insects by Papadopoulou et al. (2010). We included two fossil calibration points for MRCA of Arrenuroidea, Miocene (Cook 1957; Dabert et al. 2016) with an exponential distribution (mean (lambda) = 3.11, offset = 11.5) and Erythraeoidea, Cretaceous, Albian (Dunlop 2007; Dabert et al. 2016) with an exponential distribution (mean (lambda) = 8, offset = 115).

Two independent runs of 15,000,000 generations were processed, with sampling every 1000 generations. The resulting tree sets were combined using LogCombiner v2.7.3 with 10% burn-in. The final ESS values were checked using Tracer v1.7 (Rambaut et al. 2018) and each value was recorded as >300. A maximum clade credibility tree has been computed with TreeAnnotator v2.7.3.

Results

Phylogenetic analysis

The COI phylogenetic analyses revealed five species-level clades in the Teutonia genus, i.e. previously known species Teutonia corsicana and Teutonia cometes as well as three undescribed lineages corresponding to the taxa new for science, i.e. Teutonia condei sp. nov., Teutonia lusitanica sp. nov. and Teutonia herminiana sp. nov. All lineages were registered as highly-supported (1.00/ 95 – 1.00/100) both in the Bayesian and ML analyses. Topologies of the phylogenetic trees were generally similar, besides Turkish haplotype of Teutonia cometes, which was divided in separate lineage in the Bayesian analysis and was mixtured with other haplotypes in the ML analysis. Teutonia corsicana represents a basal clade to the other species of Teutonia. Teutonia cometes was revealed as a sister clade to T. condei sp. nov., and T. lusitanica sp. nov. and T. herminiana sp. nov. were recovered as sister clades, but with moderate supports.

TABLE 2.

Estimates of average genetic distance (K2P) within and between clades examined species of the genus Teutonia sequence pairs in and between COI haplogroups are shown.

img-z5-3_381.gif

FIGURE 1.

Bayesian phylogeny of the COI data set (three codons of COI) of the genus Teutonia. Scale bar indicates the branch lengths. Black numbers near nodes are Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP)/ML ultrafast bootstrap support values (BS).

img-z5-4_381.jpg

The mean genetic distance between COI sequence groups recovered in the ML analysis was ranged from 14.6% between T. lusitanica sp. nov. and T. condei sp. nov., to 19.0% between T. cometes and T. corsicana (Table 2). These genetic distances were higher than the barcoding gap found by the ASAP method (1% to 14%; Fig. 1A-B), which supports the species-status of the new species. On the other hand, the mean intraspecific distance within clades was very low, ranging from 0.08% K2P in T. herminiana sp. nov. to 1.89% K2P in T. cometes.

FIGURE 2.

Time-calibrated phylogeny of Teutonia spp. based on the COI dataset reconstructed using external COI rate for insects (Suchard et al. 2018) and fossil records for Arrenuroidea (Cook, 1957) and Erythraeoidea (Dunlop, 2007; Dabert et al. 2016). Calibration points are marked by yellow stars. Red numbers near nodes are Bayesian posterior probability (BPP) values from BEAST v. 2.7.3. Black numbers near nodes are the mean node ages. Node bars are 95% HPD of divergence time. Stratigraphic chart according to the International Commission on Stratigraphy, 2022 (< https://stratigraphy.org/chart>).

img-z6-2_381.jpg

Time-calibrated reconstruction of phylogeny

Time-calibrated COI phylogeny showed that the MRCA of Teutonia more likely originated in the Oligocene (mean age = 29.8 Ma, 95% highest posterior densities (HPD) = 11.4-53.9 Ma, BEAST BPP = 1.00). In that time the ancestors of Teutonia corsicana and the clade, including Teutonia cometes, T. herminiana sp. nov, T. condei sp. nov. and T. lusitanica sp. nov., were separated. The speciation processes in the latter group could start from the early Miocene 20.9 Ma (95% HPD = 8.4–37.8 Ma, BEAST BPP = 0.65) and continued during the late Miocene. The MRCA of Teutonia cometes and T. condei sp. nov. could originate around 15.9 Ma (95% HPD = 5.2–29.9 Ma, BEAST BPP = 0.52). In turn, T. lusitanica sp. nov. and T. herminiana sp. nov., most likely diverged from their MRCA approximately 11.2 Ma (95% HPD = 2.9–22.1 Ma, BEAST BPP = 1.00).

Systematics

Family Teutoniidae Koenike, 1910 Genus Teutonia Koenike, 1889
Teutonia cometes (Koch, 1837)
Fig. 3C

  • Material examined—Guarda, Seia, Rio Alva, Central hidroeléctrica de Ponte dos Jugais, river, 40.385° N, 7.706° W, 555 m asl., 28 Aug. 2023, leg. Ferreira, Benitez-Bosco & Padilha, 1♂(sequenced); Seia, Rio Alva, Praia Fluvial de Sabugueiro, river, 40.401° N, 7.64° W, 1021 m asl., 24 Aug. 2023, leg. Ferreira, Benitez-Bosco & Padilha, 2♀ (sequenced).

  • Remarks—The specimens from Portugal morphologically match the description of Teutonia cometes, a species reported as widely distributed in the Palaearctic (Di Sabatino et al. 2010). The sequenced specimens from Portugal cluster within BOLD:ACH7884, which, in addition to the specimens used in this study, includes specimens of T. cometes from Norway and Montenegro. There is an additional BIN for this species that includes currently a single specimen from Turkey (BOLD: AEN6005).

  • Distribution—Europe, from Norway to Portugal. In regard to the presence of four distinct lineages, the former records of T. cometes from Portugal by Lundblad (1956) require confirmation. Sympatric with Teutonia lusitanica sp. nov.

  • FIGURE 3.

    A-B Results of ASAP analysis for COI sequences. (A) Distribution of pairwise differences, (B) Ranked pairwise differences. (C) Teutonia cometes, ♀ (BGE_00227_B06): palp, medial view (inset: P-2 ventrodistal projection, 2x enlarged). Scale bars = 100 µm.

    img-z7-7_381.jpg

    Teutonia lusitanica Pešić sp. nov.
    Figs. 45

  • Material examined—Holotype ♂ (sequenced; voucher id: BGE_00110_F09), Portugal, Beja, Odemira, Ribeira de Seixe, Zambujeira do Mar, river (Fig. 10C), 37.399° N, 8.723° W, 45 m asl., 23 May 2023, leg. Ekrem & Benitez-Bosco, dissected and slide mounted (RMNH). Paratypes: Faro, Aljezur, Ribeira de Seixe, Odeceixe (Covão da Serva), 37.374°N, 8.642° W, 100 m asl., 23 May 2023, leg. Ekrem & Benitez-Bosco, 1♂, 2♀ (sequenced), one ♀ (voucher id: BGE_00110_F11) dissected and slide mounted (RMNH); Beja: Odemira, Ribeira de Seixe, Herdade do Vale de Águia, river, 37.398° N, 8.680° W, 75 m asl., 23 May 2023, leg. Ekrem & Benitez-Bosco, 3♀ (sequenced; RMNH); Odemira, Ribeira de Seixe, Zambujeira do Mar, 37.399° N, 8.723° W, 45 m asl., 23 May 2023, leg. Ekrem & Benitez-Bosco, 1♂, 2♀ (sequenced; RMNH); Mértola, Moinho de Alferes 2, 37.503° N, 7.687° W, 19 May 2023, leg. Ferreira, Benitez-Bosco, Ekrem, Stur & Turaccio, 1♀(sequenced; RMNH). Guarda: Seia, Casa do Loureiro, 40.433° N, 7.701° W, 415 m asl., 19 Jul. 2023 leg. Ferreira & Padilha, 1♀ (sequenced; RMNH); Seia, Rio Alva, Central hidroeléctrica de Ponte dos Jugais, river, 40.385° N, 7.706° W, 555 m asl., 28 Aug. 2023, leg. Ferreira, Benitez-Bosco & Padilha, 1♀ (sequenced; RMNH).

  • Diagnosis—Morphological: in both sexes P-2 with comparatively long, broad-based ventrodistal projection (L/W ratio 1.7-2.0), L ratio: distance from P-4 ventral tubercle to the end of the ventral margin of P-4/total length of P-4, 0.42-0.46. Molecular: this lineage differs from T. corsicana by 14.6%, from T. cometes by 17.0% K2P for COI.

  • Description. General features—Integument finely striated. Coxae medially touching, but not fused, with a few setae. Ac-1-2 rectangular, Ac-3 roundish. P-2 with an elongated and more or less a broad-based ventrodistal projection, P-3 with nearly straight, or slightly convex ventral margin, P-3 lateral seta long, shifted to medial surface, P-4 slender, bearing several fine hair-like setae, mainly in anteroventral part (Figs. 4B, 5B). Legs: claws with claw blade and ventral clawlets; swimming setae restricted to III-/IV-L-3-4, numbers: III-L-3, 2-3; III-L-4, 9-10; III-L-5, 10-11; IV-L-3, 4-5; IVL-4, 9-11; IV-L-5, 13-15. Male—Glandularium on Cx-IV completely surrounded by coxal sclerotization. Genital flaps medially with a dense cover of fine setae, pregenital sclerite small, postgenital sclerite longer. Female—Glandularium on Cx-IV partly surrounded by coxal sclerite, medially in contact with the perigenital membrane. Genital flaps with a row of regularly arranged medial setae, pregenital sclerite large, crescent shaped, partly covered by genital flaps (Fig. 5C; but in some Koenike-fixed specimens pregenital sclerite not covered by genital flaps, as illustrated in Fig. 5D), gonopore all over its length flanked by Ac and genital flaps, postgenital sclerite shorter than pregenital sclerite.

  • Description. Male (holotype BGE_00110_F09; in parentheses some measurements of paratypes)—Idiosoma L 780 (828), W (700). Coxal field L: 454, W 677; Cx-III W 434. Genital field L/W 138/117, genital flaps L 131; pregenital sclerite W 37, postgenital sclerite W 125; L Ac-1-3: 38, 34, 31. Ejaculatory complex L 164.

  • Palp (in parentheses measurement of mounted palp of paratype BGE_00110_F05): total L 541, dL/H, dL/H ratio: P-1, 20/41, 0.5 (28/42, 0.67); P-2, 114/88, 1.3 (124/94, 1.32); P-3, 127/73, 1.72 (141/83, 1.7); P-4, 233/31, 7.56 (264/36, 7.35); P-5, 47/13, 3.75 (45/12, 3.7); L/W ratio P-2 ventrodistal projection 2.0 (1.9); L ratio P-2/P-4, 0.49 (0.47). Gnathosoma vL 139; chelicera L 231, basal segment L 188, claw L 42, L ratio chelicera basal segment/claw 4.8. Leg segments dL: I-L: 69, 104, 125, 173, 184, 210; longest I-L-5 ventrodistal seta L 73, L ventrodistal seta/I-L-5 ratio 0.35. dL IV-L: 161, 131, 163, 197, 209, 244.

  • Female (paratype, BGE_00110_F11; in parentheses some measurements of paratype BGE_00110_E08)—Idiosoma L (1220), W (1020). Coxal field: L 533, W 847; Cx-III W 553. Genital field L 230 (248), genital flaps L 182 (180), pregenital sclerite W 194 (191), postgenital sclerite W 128 (113); L Ac-1-3: 50, 47, 42 (53, 59, 43). Eggs maximum diameter (n= 3) 181-188.

  • Palp: total L 713, dL/H, dL/H ratio: P-1, 31/51, 0.6; P-2, 145/116, 1.26; P-3, 170/105, 1.62; P-4, 316/41, 7.77; P-5, 51/14, 3.62; L/W ratio P-2 ventrodistal projection 1.7; L ratio P-2/P-4, 0.46. Gnathosoma vL 178; chelicera L 295, basal segment L 244, claw L 54, L ratio chelicera basal segment/claw 4.5. Leg segments: dL I-L: 78, 134, 156, 212, 231, 256; longest I-L-5 ventrodistal seta L 94, L ventrodistal seta/I-L-5 ratio 0.37. dL IV-L-1-6: 156, 163, 218, 252, 275, 314.

  • Etymology—The name refers to the geographical provenance (from Latin lusitanicus, Lusitanian, Portuguese) from which the new species is currently only known, but where it seems to have a wide distribution.

  • DNA Barcoding data—The COI sequences of T. lusitanica sp. nov. form a unique cluster (BOLD:AFP7254), with the nearest neighbouring BIN being that of an unidentified Limnesia sp. (BOLD:AAE0971) from Canada. The genetic distance between these two clades in the BOLD was estimated at 11.86% p-distance.

  • Remarks—Currently, three species of the genus Teutonia are known from the Western Palaearctic, i.e., the widely distributed T. cometes (Koch, 1837), T. subalpina Thor, 1897 and T. corsicana Pešić & Smit 2022. The little-known T. subalpina can be distinguished in the female by the very long gonopore, anteriorly distinctly extending over the margin of the genital flaps (Di Sabatino et al. 2010). From T. corsicana, the new species from Portugal in both sexes can be distinguished by the more elongated and consequently much slender (L/W ratio 1.5-1.7) ventrodistal projection of P-2. In Teutonia cometes the ventral projection of P-2 in both sexes is on a narrow base, and peg-like (L/W ratio 1.8 in specimen from Portugal). From the new species from Portugal, T. cometes can be separated by ventral tubercle on P-4 shifted more distally, reaching anterior third of the ventral margin of the segment (L ratio distance from ventral tubercle to the end of the ventral margin of P-4/total length of P-4 was 0.32-0.33 in T. cometes vs. 0.42-0.46 in T. lusitanica). The high genetic distance between the new species and T. cometes (COI 17.0% K2P) suggests a long independent history of these two species. For distinction from Teutonia herminiana sp. nov and Teutonia condei sp. nov see below.

  • Distribution—Portugal: Guarda, Beja and Faro districts.

  • FIGURE 4.

    Teutonia lusitanica sp. nov., male holotype (BGE_00110_F09). A—coxal and genital field, partial view; B—palp, medial view (P-1 lacking) (inset: P-2 ventrodistal projection, 2x enlarged); C—chelicera. Scale bars = 100 µm.

    img-z9-1_381.jpg

    FIGURE 5.

    Teutonia lusitanica sp. nov., female (A-C, E-F paratype BGE_00110_F11; D paratype BGE_00110_E08). A—coxal and genital field; B—palp, lateral view; C-D—genital fields; E—I-leg-5 and -6; F—IV-leg-6. Scale bars = 100 µm.

    img-z10-1_381.jpg

    Teutonia herminiana Pešić sp. nov.
    Figs. 67

  • Material examined—Holotype ♂ (sequenced; voucher id: BGE_00108_A08), Guarda, Manteigas, Zezere, Covão da Ametade (Fig. 10A), 40.328° N, 7.587° W, 1431 m asl., 21 Aug. 2023, leg. Ferreira, Benitez-Bosco & Padilha, dissected and slide mounted (RMNH). Paratypes: 1♀(sequenced; voucher id: BGE_00227_G08; juvenile specimen; RMNH), same data as the holotype, leg. Ferreira, Benitez-Bosco & Padilha; 1♂ (sequenced; voucher id: BGE_00227_E07, coxae and genital field partly damaged; RMNH), Manteigas, Casa do Cantoneiro, 40.418, 7.603° W, 1378 m asl., 24 Aug. 2023, leg. Ferreira, Benitez-Bosco & Padilha; 1♀ (sequenced), Manteigas, Poço do Inferno, 40.373° N, 7.516° W, 1078 m asl., 21 Aug. 2023, leg. Ferreira, Benitez-Bosco & Padilha, dissected and slide mounted (voucher id: BGE_00227_C11; RMNH).

  • Diagnosis—Morphological: in both sexes P-2 with comparatively long, broad-based ventrodistal projection (L/W ratio 1.4-1.7); P-2 ventral seta placed posteriorly from the ventrodistal projection, ventral tubercle on P-4 located in the central third of the segment (L ratio distance from ventral tubercle to the end of the ventral margin of P-4/total length of P-4, 0.38-0.4). Molecular: this lineage differs from T. lusitanica sp. nov. by 11.4% K2P for COI.

  • Description. General features—Integument finely striated. Coxae with a few setae, in female first coxae slightly fused medially at its posterior end (as illustrate in Figure 4A; possibly this character state is age-dependent as a result of more or less developed development of secondary sclerotization). Ac-1-2 rectangular, Ac-3 roundish. P-2 with an elongated and more or less a broad-based ventrodistal projection, medial seta on P-2 placed proximally from the ventrodistal projection, P-3 with nearly straight, or slightly convex ventral margin, P-3 lateral seta long, shifted to medial surface, P-4 slender, bearing several fine hair-like setae, mainly in anteroventral part (Figs. 6D-E, 7B). Legs: claws with claw blade and ventral clawlets; swimming setae restricted to III-/IV-L-3-4, numbers: III-L-3, 3-5; III-L-4, 8-11; III-L-5, 8-12; IV-L-3, 3-5; IV-L-4, 10-11; IV-L-5, 12-16. Male—Glandularium on Cx-IV completely surrounded by coxal sclerotization (Figure 6A). Genital flaps medially with a dense cover of fine setae, pregenital sclerite small, postgenital sclerite longer. Female—Glandularium on Cx-IV partly surrounded by coxal sclerite, medially in contact with the perigenital membrane (Figure 7A). Genital flaps with a row of regularly arranged medial setae, pregenital sclerite large, crescent shaped, partly covered by genital flaps, gonopore all over its length flanked by Ac and genital flaps, postgenital sclerite shorter than pregenital sclerite.

  • Description. Male (holotype; BGE_00108_A08) — Idiosoma L 575, W 547. Coxal field L 412, W 506; Cx-III W 381. Genital field L/W 149/106, genital flaps L 98; pregenital sclerite W 45, postgenital sclerite W 192; maximum diameter Ac-1-3: 44, 51, 36.

  • Palp: total L 508, dL/H, dL/H ratio: P-1, 21/33, 0.64; P-2, 103/80, 1.29; P-3, 120/72, 1.67; P-4, 222/23, 9.48; P-5, 42/13, 3.4; L/W ratio P-2 ventrodistal projection 1.7; L ratio P-2/P-4, 0.46. Gnathosoma vL 144; chelicera L 203, basal segment L 172, claw L 34, L ratio chelicera basal segment/claw 5.0. Leg segments dL: I-L: 65, 94, 111, 150, 158, 188; longest I-L-5 ventrodistal seta L 75, L ventrodistal seta/I-L-5 ratio 0.4. dL IV-L: 120, 119, 156, 184, 193, 242.

  • Female (paratype; BGE_00227_C11)—Idiosoma L 925. Coxal field: L 515, W 783; Cx-III W 484. Genital flaps L 172, pregenital sclerite W 163; maximum diameter Ac-1-3: 59, 64, 38.

  • Palp: total L 678, dL/H, dL/H ratio: P-1, 27/42, 0.63; P-2, 139/103, 1.35; P-3, 165/89, 1.85; P-4, 292/35, 8.39; P-5, 55/14, 3.88; L/W ratio P-2 ventrodistal projection 1.4; L ratio P-2/P-4, 0.48. Gnathosoma vL 197; chelicera L 281.

  • Leg segments: dL I-L: 75, 119, 142, 198, 206, 243; longest I-L-5 ventrodistal seta L 94, L ventrodistal seta/I-L-5 ratio 0.39. dL IV-L: 150, 147, 197, 235, 238, 284.

  • Etymology—Named after the mountains (Mons Herminius, the Roman name for Serra da Estrela), where the new species was discovered.

  • Discussion—Teutonia herminiana sp. nov., resembles T. lusitanica sp. nov. in sharing an elongated and slender ventrodistal projection of P-2 (L/W ratio 1.4-1.7). From the latter species, T. herminiana sp. nov. can be easily distinguished by the position of the ventral seta on P-2, which is placed posterior to the ventrodistal projection (in T. lusitanica sp. nov. and other known species of the genus this seta is regularly placed laterally from the base of ventrodistal projection). In female Teutonia herminiana sp. nov, the coxae are medially slightly fused at their posterior end, while in T. lusitanica sp. nov. they are only touching but not fused.

  • Distribution—Portugal, known only from the three sites located in the Serra da Estrela Mountains, the highest elevation in mainland Portugal. Sympatric with Teutonia condei sp. nov.

  • FIGURE 6.

    Teutonia herminiana sp. nov., male holotype (BGE_00108_A08). A—coxal and genital field; B—chelicera; C—IV-L-5 and -6; D—palp, lateral view; E—palp, medial view. Scale bars = 100 µm.

    img-z12-1_381.jpg

    FIGURE 7.

    Teutonia herminiana sp. nov., female paratype (BGE_00227_C11). A—coxal and genital field, partial view; B—palp, medial view (inset: P-2 ventrodistal projection, 2x enlarged); C—I-L-5 and -6. Scale bars = 100 µm.

    img-z13-1_381.jpg

    Teutonia condei Pešić sp. nov.
    Figs. 89

  • Material examined—Holotype ♂ (sequenced; voucher ID: BGE_00227_G10), Guarda, Manteigas, Zezere, Covão da Ametade (Fig. 10A), 40.328° N, 7.587° W, 1431 m asl., 21 Aug. 2023, leg. Ferreira, Benitez-Bosco & Padilha, dissected and slide mounted. Paratypes: 1♂, 2♀ (sequenced), Manteigas, Casa do Cantoneiro, 40.418° N, 7.603° W, 1378 m asl., 24 Aug. 2023, leg. Ferreira, Benitez-Bosco & Padilha, 1♀ (voucher id: BGE_00227_E06) dissected and slide mounted (RMNH).

  • Diagnosis—Morphological: in both sexes P-2 with moderately long, broad-based ventrodistal projection (L/W ratio 1.35-1.46), P-2 ventral seta placed laterally from the ventrodistal projection; ventral tubercle on P-4 located in the central third of the segment (L ratio distance from ventral tubercle to the end of the ventral margin of P-4/total length of P-4, 0.42-0.47). Molecular: this lineage differs from T. corsicana by 15.1% and from T. cometes by 17.3% K2P for COI.

  • Description. General features—Integument finely striated. Coxae medially touching, but not fused, with a few setae. Ac-1-2 rectangular, Ac-3 roundish. P-2 with a moderately slender and more or less a broad-based ventrodistal projection, P-2 ventral seta placed laterally from the ventrodistal projection, P-3 with nearly straight, or slightly convex ventral margin, P-3 lateral seta long, shifted to medial surface, P-4 slender, bearing several fine hair-like setae, mainly in anteroventral part (Figs. 8B-C). Legs: claws with claw blade and ventral clawlets; swimming setae restricted to III-/IV-L-3-4, numbers: III-L-3, 5; III-L-4, 8-10; III-L-5, 9-12; IV-L-3, 3-4; IV-L-4, 12; IV-L-5, 16-17.

  • Male—Glandularium on Cx-IV completely surrounded by coxal sclerotization. Genital field: genital flaps medially with a dense cover of fine setae, pregenital sclerite small, postgenital sclerite longer. Female—Glandularium on Cx-IV partly surrounded by coxal sclerite, medially in contact with the perigenital membrane. Genital flaps with a row of regularly arranged medial setae, pregenital sclerite very large, curved, crescent shaped, partly covered by genital flaps, gonopore all over its length flanked by Ac and genital flaps (Fig. 9A), postgenital sclerite shorter than pregenital sclerite.

  • Description. Male (holotype; BGE_00227_G10)—Idiosoma L 850, W 727. Coxal field L 467, W 631; Cx-III W 403. Genital field L/W 178/119, genital flaps L 156; pregenital sclerite W 57, postgenital sclerite W 107; maximum diameter Ac-1-3: 53. 56. 42. Ejaculatory complex L 219.

  • Palp: total L 505, dL/H, dL/H ratio: P-1, 24/36, 0.67; P-2, 109/79, 1.39; P-3, 114/69, 1.66; P-4, 217/30, 7.3; P-5, 41/14, 2.9; L/W ratio P-2 ventrodistal projection 1.46; L ratio P-2/P-4, 0.5. Gnathosoma vL 133; chelicera L 188, basal segment L 147, claw L 35, L ratio chelicera basal segment/claw 4.2. Leg segments: dL I-L-2-6: 98, 114, 169, 180, 211; longest I-L-5 ventrodistal seta L 63, L ventrodistal seta/I-L-5 ratio 0.3. dL IV-L: 122, 128, 163, 197, 218, 260.

  • Female (paratype; BGE_00227_E06)—Idiosoma L, W. Coxal field: L 550, W 918; Cx-III W 543. Genital flaps L 198, pregenital sclerite W 231; maximum diameter Ac-1-3: 69, 66, 47. Eggs maximum diameter (n=2) 184-194.

  • Palp: total L 683, dL/H, dL/H ratio: P-1, 34/48, 0.71; P-2, 142/109, 1.3; P-3, 162/91, 1.79; P-4, 291/37, 8.0; P-5, 54/15, 3.5; L/W ratio P-2 ventrodistal projection 1.35; L ratio P-2/P-4, 0.49. Gnathosoma vL 213; chelicera L 278, basal segment L 216, claw L 50, L ratio chelicera basal segment/claw 4.3. Leg segments: dL I-L: 81, 119, 144, 222, 240, 274. dL IV-L: 138, 153, 206, 263, 258, 334.

  • Etymology—Named after Jose Conde (Serra da Estrela Interpretation Center, Municipality of Seia, Portugal) in appreciation of his dedication and outstanding contribution to studying and protecting biodiversity in Serra da Estrela region.

  • Discussion—Morphologically the new species from Portugal most closely resembles T. corsicana, a species known from Corsica and Sardinia. Both species share a broad-based and moderately slender ventrodistal projection on P-2. However, in comparison with the new species, P-2 ventrodistal projection in T. corsicana is somewhat broader (L/W ratio about 1.3). Further differences are found in IV-L-5 bearing only three ventral setae in T. corsicana (see Fig. 3G in Pešić & Smit 2022).

  • Phylogenetic analysis based on COI data placed Teutonia condei sp. nov. as a sister species of T. cometes. The latter species can easily be distinguished by the slender and peg-like ventral projection of P-2, and the ventral tubercle on P-4 shifted more distally (L ratio distance from ventral tubercle to the end of the ventral margin of P-4/total length of P-4 was 0.32-0.33 in T. cometes vs. 0.42-0.47 in T. condei sp. nov.). The high genetic distance between T. cometes and T. condei sp. nov. (COI 15.1% K2P), suggests a long independent history of the new species.

  • Distribution—Portugal; known only from two sites located in Serra da Estrela Mountains, the highest elevation in mainland Portugal. Sympatric with T. herminiana sp. nov.

  • FIGURE 8.

    Teutonia condei sp. nov., male holotype (BGE_00227_G10). A—coxal and genital field; B—palp, medial view; C—palp, lateral view (inset: P-2 ventrodistal projection, 2x enlarged). Scale bars = 100 µm.

    img-z15-1_381.jpg

    FIGURE 9.

    Teutonia condei sp. nov., female holotype (BGE_00227_E06). A—coxal and genital field, partial view; B—I-L-5 and -6; C—palp, medial view (inset: P-2 ventrodistal projection, 2x enlarged); D—chelicera; E – IV-L-6 (inset: terminal part of segment, enlarged 2x). Scale bars = 100 µm.

    img-z16-1_381.jpg

    FIGURE 10.

    Photographs of selected sampling sites: A—Guarda, Covão da Ametade (type locality of Teutonia herminiana sp. nov. and T. condei sp. nov.). B—Guarda, Central hidroeléctrica de Ponte dos Jugais (sampling site of T. lusitanica sp. nov. and T. cometes). C—Beja, Zambujeira do Mar (type locality of T. lusitanica sp. nov.). Photos by E. Stur (A-B) and T. Ekrem (C).

    img-z17-2_381.jpg

    Discussion

    As emphasized in the introductory part, the morphological identification of the species of the genus Teutonia can be challenging because due to weak sclerotization of the coxae, genital field and appendages, the verification of these characters can be difficult. Despite the fact that many studies have highlighted the limitation of using a single gene barcode, its usefulness has been demonstrated in a number of recent studies on water mites. These studies have shown the utility of this approach in detecting previously overlooked lineages that would be difficult to be discovered based on morphological features alone (see e.g. Martin et al. 2017, 2023; Pešić et al. 2017, 2019, 2023).

    Morphological stasis in Teutonia has resulted in three species of this genus being registered for the Western Palearctic so far, with the third species (T. corsicana) only recently described using an integrative approach that includes DNA barcoding (Pešić & Smit 2022). Most records of teutoniid mites in the water mite literature are attributed to T. cometes, a species often reported to be widespread in the Palaearctic (Di Sabatino et al. 2010). Another species, T. subalpina Thor, 1897, known from the far east of Europe and Siberia, is still poorly known and requires additional research to clarify its taxonomic status. Di Sabatino et al. (2010) argue that it is possible that this taxon is based on unsclerotized, newly hatched, deformed adults of T. cometes.

    Currently all species of Teutonia in Europe are represented by a single BIN, with the exception of Teutonia cometes which is represented by two BINs, BOLD:ACH7884 which grouped from specimens from Montenegro, Norway and Portugal, and BOLD:AEN6005 which includes one specimen from Turkey. The p-distance between these two BINs was estimated at 6.67% indicating their historical isolation and phylogeographic break between European and Turkish populations of T. cometes.

    Fossil-calibrated modeling reveals that the most recent common ancestor of European species of the genus Teutonia originated in the Oligocene. Phylogenetic and dating analyzes show the presence of at least five species-level clades within the genus Teutonia in Europe, with the T. corsicana clade as the earliest branching lineage. Our calibrated molecular clock data revealed that T. corsicana, a species endemic to Corsica and Sardinia, is quite old. We infer the origin of the T. corsicana clade at 29.0 Ma, near the Eocene-Oligocene boundary, indicating that this species or its most recent ancestor was already present on the Corsica-Sardinia Block (CSB) microplate when this microplate broke off from the Iberian Peninsula. This process has been dated to about 29 million years (Alvarez 1972) and was followed by the separation and counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of 23° to 53° rotation of the Corsica-Sardinia that stopped ∼16 Ma (Speranza et al. 2002).

    The remaining Teutonia clades are relatively younger and began their divergence in the early Miocene (ca. 21 Ma) and continued with individual species throughout the Miocene. The reconstruction of palaeogeological events that are possibly responsible for the hypothetical radiation events of these clades is almost impossible for now, primarily due to the fact that the distribution of these species is still not sufficiently known. For example, all four lineages (only exception is T. corsicana which is endemic to Corsica and Sardinia) are present in Portugal, three of them seem to be endemic to this country. Interestingly, two of these three species, T. herminiana sp. nov. and T. condei sp. nov are found only in the Serra da Estrela Mountain range, which indicates their possible limited distribution, but also emphasizes the high diversity of this genus on the Iberian Peninsula.

    Several cases of high diversity of certain genera in Southern European Peninsulas have been described in other taxonomic groups, both in vertebrates and invertebrates (Weiss & Ferrand 2007). Specifically, the Iberian Peninsula has been shown to have been a glacial refugium with high internal complexity, that for many species, populations with a high degree of genetic structure have existed throughout the Pleistocene (Goméz & Lund, 2007). The Serra da Estrela Mountain range, and the Portuguese southwest coast are recognized areas of high endemism in the Iberian Peninsula and were found to be refugial areas identified by different case studies (e. g. Crochet et al. 2004; Gante et al. 2007; Corley & Ferreira 2021).

    Our study revealed that speciation processes in European Teutonia spp. began much long before the beginning of the Pleistocene glaciations, which are often considered to be the main driver of the diversification of European biota (Hewitt 1996). Having in mind that we found three species in our study restricted to the Serra da Estrela Mountain range and the Portuguese southwest coast, it is likely that the present-day distribution of the European Teutonia spp. was primarily shaped by events in the Pleistocene. To address this interesting question, which is beyond the scope of this work, additional studies on the distribution and genetic structure of the European Teutonia populations are necessary.

    Acknowledgements

    Biodiversity Genomics Europe (Grant no.101059492) is funded by Horizon Europe under the Biodiversity, Circular Economy and Environment call (REA.B.3); co-funded by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) under contract number 22.00173; and by the UK Research and Innovation under the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy's Horizon Europe Guarantee Scheme.

    SF was funded by the FCT through the program ‘Stimulus of Scientific Employment, Individual Support—3rd Edition’ ( https://doi.org/10.54499/2020.03526.CEECIND/CP1601/CP1649/CT0007). The authors would like to acknowledge to Estação Biológica de Mértola, to Mértola Municipality, to CISE and to Seia Municipality and to Faculty of Sciences – University of Porto for the logistic support during the fieldwork and to Laura Benitez-Bosco, Torbjørn Ekrem, Thomas S. Ekrem, Piotr Gadawski, Roman Hodunko, José Conde, Tiago Correia, Antonio Rodrigues, Adriana Padilha and Rui Andrade for the great company during fieldwork. We thank two anonymous reviewers, whose constructive comments greatly improved this work.

    © Systematic & Applied Acarology Society

    References

    1.

    Alvarez, W. (1972) Rotation of the Corsica-Sardinia microplate. Nature , 235, 103–105.  https://doi.org/10.1038/physci235103a0  Google Scholar

    2.

    Bouckaert, R., Vaughan, T.G., Barido-Sottani, J., Duchêne, S., Fourment, M., Gavryushkina, A., Heled, J., Jones, G., Kühnert, D., De Maio, N., Matschiner, M., Mendes, F.K., Müller, N.F., Ogilvie, H.A., du Plessis, L., Popinga, A., Rambaut, A., Rasmussen, D., Siveroni, I., Suchard, M.A., Wu, C., Xie, D., Zhang, C. & Stadler, T. (2019) BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology , 15(4), e1006650.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650  Google Scholar

    3.

    Cook, D.R. (1957) Order Acarina. Suborder Hydracarina. Genus Protoarrenurus Cook, n. gen. In : Palmer, A.R. (Ed.), Miocene Arthropods from the Mojave Desert, California. Professional Papers, Geological Survey No. 294, pp. 248–249. Google Scholar

    4.

    Dabert, J., Proctor, H. & Dabert, M. (2016) Higher-level molecular phylogeny of the water mites (Acariformes: Prostigmata: Parasitengonina: Hydrachnidiae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution , 101, 75–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.05.004  Google Scholar

    5.

    Dunlop, J.A. (2007) A large parasitengonid mite (Acari, Erythraeoidea) from the Early Cretaceous Crato Formation of Brazil. Fossil Record , 10, 91–98.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mmng.200700001  Google Scholar

    6.

    Cantallo, H., Gomes, N., Antunes, C., Martins, D. & Costa, D.A. (2022) Checklist of water mites from mainland Portugal and its archipelagos. Zootaxa , 5213, 336–370.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5213.4.2  Google Scholar

    7.

    Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B.Q. (2016) Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Systematic Biology , 65(6), 997–1008.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw037  Google Scholar

    8.

    Corley, M.F. & Ferreira, S. (2021) Ypsolopha milfontensis Corley & Ferreira, a new species from the Portuguese coast (Lepidoptera: Ypsolophidae). SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterologia , 49(193), 55–64.  https://doi.org/10.57065/shilap.324  Google Scholar

    9.

    Crochet, P.A., Chaline, O., Surget-Groba, Y., Debain, C. & Cheylan, M. (2004) Speciation in mountains: phylogeography and phylogeny of the rock lizards genus Iberolacerta (Reptilia: Lacertidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution , 30(3), 860–866.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2003.07.016  Google Scholar

    10.

    Di Sabatino, A., Gerecke, R., Gledhill, T. & Smit, H. (2010) Acari: Hydrachnidia II. In : Gerecke, R. (Ed.), Chelicerata: Acari II. Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa, Vol. 7, 2–2, Elsevier Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 1–234. Google Scholar

    11.

    Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high 679 throughput. Nucleic acids research , 32, 1792–1797.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340  Google Scholar

    12.

    Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution , 39, 783–791.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x  Google Scholar

    13.

    Gante, H.F., Santos, C.D. & Alves, M.J. (2007) A new species of Chondrostoma Agassiz, 1832 (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) with sexual dimorphism from the lower Rio Tejo Basin, Portugal. Zootaxa , 1616, 23–35.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1616.1.2  Google Scholar

    14.

    Gerecke, R., Gledhill, T., Pešić, V. & Smit, H. (2016) Chelicerata: Acari III. In : Gerecke, R. (Ed.), Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa, Bd. 7/2-3. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1–429. Google Scholar

    15.

    Gómez, A. & Lunt, D.H. (2007) Refugia within refugia: patterns of phylogeographic concordance in the Iberian Peninsula. In : Weiss, S. & Ferrand, N. (Eds.), Phylogeography of southern European refugia. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 155–188. Google Scholar

    16.

    Hoang, L., Wu, F-Y., Clift, P.D., Wysocka, A. & Swierczewska, A. (2009) Evaluating the evolution of the Red River system based on in situ U-Pb dating and Hf isotope analysis of zircons. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems , 10(11), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GC002819  Google Scholar

    17.

    Hewitt, G.M. (1996) Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biological journal of the Linnean Society , 58, 247–276.  https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1996.0035  Google Scholar

    18.

    Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B.Q., Wong, T.K.F., von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L.S. (2017) Model finder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods , 14(6), 587–589.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285  Google Scholar

    19.

    Kimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution , 16, 111–120.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581  Google Scholar

    20.

    Lundblad, O. (1956) Zur Kenntnis süd-und mitteleuropäischer Hydrachnellen. Arkiv för Zoologi , 10, 1–306. Google Scholar

    21.

    Martin, P., Dabert, M. & Dabert, J. (2010) Molecular evidence for species separation in the water mite Hygrobates nigromaculatus Lebert, 1879 (Acari, Hydrachnidia): evolutionary consequences of the loss of larval parasitism. Aquatic Science , 72, 347–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-010-0135-x  Google Scholar

    22.

    Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), IEEE. p 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129  Google Scholar

    23.

    Papadopoulou, A., Anastasiou, I. & Vogler, A.P. (2010) Revisiting the insect mitochondrial molecular clock: the mid-Aegean trench calibration. Molecular Biology and Evolution , 27(7), 1659–1672.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq051  Google Scholar

    24.

    Pešić, V. & Goldschmidt, T. (2023) New DNA-assisted records of water mites from Sardinia, with the description of a new species (Acari, Hydrachnidia). Ecologica Montenegrina , 69, 24–44.  https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2023.69.4  Google Scholar

    25.

    Pešić, V., Asadi, M., Cimpean, M., Dabert, M., Esen, Y., Gerecke, R., Martin, P., Savić, A., Smit, H. & Stur, E. (2017) Six species in one: Evidence of cryptic speciation in the Hygrobates fluviatilis complex (Acariformes, Hydrachnidia, Hygrobatidae). Systematic & Applied Acarology , 22, 1327–1377.  https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.22.9.4  Google Scholar

    26.

    Pešić, V., Broda, Ł., Dabert, M., Gerecke, R., Martin, P. & Smit, H. (2019a) Re-established after hundred years: Definition of Hygrobates prosiliens Koenike, 1915, based on molecular and morphological evidence, and redescription of H. longipalpis (Hermann, 1804) (Acariformes, Hydrachnidia, Hygrobatidae). Systematic & Applied Acarology , 24(8), 1490–1511.  https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.24.8.10  Google Scholar

    27.

    Pešić, V. & Smit, H. (2022) A new water mite species of the genus Teutonia Koenike, 1889 from Corsica, France, based on morphological data and DNA barcodes (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Teutoniidae). Acarologia , 62, 465–473.  https://doi.org/10.24349/8n5y-mw7l  Google Scholar

    28.

    Pešić, V., Smit, H. & Konopleva, E.S. (2023) Molecular phylogeny and description of Hygrobates cyrnusensis sp. nov. reveals multiple colonization of Corsica by water mites of the H. fluviatilis-complex (Acariformes, Hydrachnidia, Hygrobatidae). Acarologia , 63(1), 262–274.  https://doi.org/10.24349/h12f-rs8x  Google Scholar

    29.

    Pešić, V., Zawal, A., Ferreira, S., Benitez-Bosco, L., Cruz-Oliveira, A., Girão, D., Padilha, A., Turaccio, P., Rossini, S., Ballini, L., Staffoni, G., Fratini, S., Ciofi, C., Iannucci, A., Ekrem, T. & Stur, E. (2024) DNA barcode library of Portuguese water mites, with the descriptions of two new species (Acari, Hydrachnidia). ZooKeys , 1217, 119–171.  https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1217.131730  Google Scholar

    30.

    Puillandre, N., Brouillet, S. & Achaz, G. (2021) ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. Molecular Ecology Resources , 21(2), 609–620.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281  Google Scholar

    31.

    Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M.A. (2018) Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology , 67(5), 901–904.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032  Google Scholar

    32.

    Smit, H. (2020) Water mites of the world with keys to the families, subfamilies, genera and subgenera (Acari: Hydrachnidia). Monografieen van de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging , 12, 1–774. Google Scholar

    33.

    Speranza, F., Villa, I.M., Sagnotti, L., Florindo, F., Cosentino, D., Cipollari, P. & Mattei, M. (2002) Age of the Corsica–Sardinia rotation and Liguro–Provençal Basin spreading: New paleomagnetic and Ar/Ar evidence. Tectonophysics , 347(4), 231–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00031-8  Google Scholar

    34.

    Suchard, M.A., Lemey, P., Baele, G., Ayres, D.L., Drummond, A.J. & Rambaut, A. (2018) Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evolution , 4(1), 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vey016  Google Scholar

    35.

    Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & Kumar, S. (2021) MEGA 11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution , 38(7), 3022–3027.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120  Google Scholar

    36.

    Weiss, S.J. & Ferrand, N. (2007) Phylogeography of Southern European Refugia. Evolutionary perspectives on the origins and conservation of European biodiversity. Dordrecht, Springer, 386 pp. Google Scholar
    Vladimir Pešić, Ekaterina S. Konopleva, Alessio Iannucci, Sónia Ferreira, and Elisabeth Stur "Molecular phylogeny reveals three new water mite species of the genus Teutonia Koenike, 1889, from Portugal (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Teutoniidae)," Systematic and Applied Acarology 30(2), 381-401, (28 February 2025). https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.30.2.14
    Received: 1 November 2024; Accepted: 30 January 2025; Published: 28 February 2025
    KEYWORDS
    cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI)
    DNA-barcoding
    new species
    systematics
    Water mites
    Back to Top