BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 14 May 2025 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Registered users receive a variety of benefits including the ability to customize email alerts, create favorite journals list, and save searches.
Please note that a BioOne web account does not automatically grant access to full-text content. An institutional or society member subscription is required to view non-Open Access content.
Contact helpdesk@bioone.org with any questions.
The purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.5 of the Code, is to conserve the specific name of the terrestrial snail Bulimus cylindricusMenke, 1828 (currently Brephulopsis cylindrica,enidae), originally published as a junior primary homonym of Bulimus cylindricusGray, 1825 (currently classified in the genus Macroceramus,urocoptidae) by ruling under the plenary power to disregard their primary homonymy.
The purpose of this application, under Article 70.2 of the Code, is to conserve the current usage of the generic name PhelisterMarseul, 1853 for a well-established genus of histerid beetles. Modern authors cite either Phelister haemorrhousMarseul, 1853 (designated by Kryzhanovskij & Reichardt, 1976) or Paromalus rouzetiFairmaire 1850 (designated by Mazur, 1984) as the type species of Phelister. However, the correct, long-overlooked type species is Platysoma venustumLeConte, 1844, which is currently recognized as a valid species of BaconiaLewis, 1885. Acceptance of Platysoma venustum as the type species of Phelister would change the current concept of that genus to that of Baconia, and the species currently included in Phelister would require a new genus-group name as there are no junior synonyms from which to choose the next available name. To avoid the nomenclatural instability that would result from following the Principle of Priority, it is proposed that all type fixations for PhelisterMarseul, 1853 preceding that of Phelister haemorrhousMarseul, 1853 by Kryzhanovskij & Reichardt (1976) be set aside.
The purpose of this application, under Articles 23.9.3, 23.9.5 and 81.2.1 of the Code, is to conserve the specific name Onitis aeruginosusKlug, 1855. Although Onitis aeruginosusPerty, 1830 and Onitis aeruginosusKlug, 1855 are primary homonyms, both names are in use today and have not been considered congeneric since 1859, when the senior homonym was transferred to the genus Gromphas Brullé, 1837. As the probability of these being considered congeneric in the future is very small, it is proposed that Onitis aeruginosusKlug, 1855 be conserved by ruling that it is not invalid by reason of being a primary junior homonym of Onitis aeruginosusPerty, 1830. A third homonym, Onitis aeruginosusGistel, 1831, also has priority over Onitis aeruginosusKlug, 1855, but cannot be fixed to any species; therefore, it should be considered a nomen dubium and totally suppressed for the purposes of the Principle of Priority and of the Principle of Homonymy.
The purpose of this application, under Article 81 of the Code, is the conservation of the spelling of the buprestid genus name Polybothris. The name was originally published as Polybotris but the spelling Polybothris has been in prevailing usage since 1900. Reversal of precedence cannot be used to suppress Polybotris since the spelling has been used in a small number of publications after 1899.
The purpose of this application, under Articles 29 and 55.3 of the Code, is to remove homonymy between the family-group names phycinaeSwainson, 1838 (Osteichthyes, Gadiformes, phycidae) and phycinaeLyneborg, 1976 (Insecta, Diptera, therevidae). It is proposed that the stem of the genus-group name PhycusWalker, 1850, on which the insect family-group name is based, be emended to change the family-group name to phycusinae, leaving the fish family-group name, based on PhycisWalbaum, 1792, unaltered. An issue regarding the type-species of PhycisWalbaum, 1792, came to light in this process, namely that the previously assumed type species, Tinca marina (attributed to Walbaum (1792) and considered a junior synonym of Blennius phycisLinnaeus, 1766), is a nomen nudum. So, an additional purpose of this application, under Articles 78.1 and 81.1 of the Code, is to maintain the prevailing usage of Blennius phycisLinnaeus, 1766 as the de facto type species of PhycisWalbaum, 1792 by setting aside all previous type species designations and designating Blennius phycisLinnaeus, 1766 as the type species.
The purpose of this application, under Article 33.2.3 of the Code, is to correct the spelling cheesmani to cheesmanae for a tree frog named after Evelyn Cheesman. Following the finding that Hyla montanaPeters & Doria, 1878 was in reality a member of the genus Nyctimystes Stejneger, N. montanaParker, 1936 became a secondary homonym. The replacement name, N. cheesmaniTyler, 1964, was given a masculine suffix, in error. Following the emendation to the feminine cheesmanae by Menzies (1976), there has been argument about whether the emendation was justified or not. To resolve the matter the Commission is here asked to rule that the emendation was justified and to place N. cheesmanae on the Official List of Specific Names in Zoology.
The purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.3 of the Code, is to conserve the specific name Podocnemis unifilisTroschel, 1848, for a widely distributed species of Amazonian turtle (family podocnemididae) of both economic and conservation importance, by giving it precedence over its infrequently used senior synonym Podocnemis cayennensis (Schweigger, 1812). This species, the Yellow-spotted River Turtle, has long been referred to as P. unifilis by the IUCN Red List and CITES, as well as in at least 200 scientific publications over more than a century, whereas the name P. cayennensis has only been applied to this species in very few recent publications. Prior to 1974, the name cayennensis had usually been used incorrectly for another species, the Red-headed River Turtle, Podocnemis erythrocephala (Spix, 1824), as noted and corrected by Mittermeier & Wilson (1974) and Pritchard & Trebbau (1984). The conservation of the binomen P. unifilis will stabilize the use of a name that has been in general use for this species in the vast majority of the scientific publications, government documents, endangered species lists, and the general literature for over 100 years. Giving precedence to the older name (cayennensis) would be counter to usage, and would create much confusion in the literature.
The Commission has conserved the usage of the generic name PraeradiolitesDouvillé, 1903 by designation of Sphaerulites ponsianad'Archiac, 1837 as the type species.
The Commission did not support an application to give precedence to the name Chelodina rugosa Ogilby, 1890 (currently Macrochelodina rugosa) for the northern long-necked turtle from northern Australia over Chelodina oblonga whenever the two are considered to be synonyms, nor to set aside all previous designations of a type specimen for Chelodina oblonga Gray, 1841 and to designate as its neotype the lectotype of Chelodina colliei Gray, 1856.
The Commission has conserved the specific name Testudo gigantea Schweigger, 1812 (family testudinidae) in its customary usage for the giant land tortoise found on Aldabra Atoll in the western Indian Ocean, by affirmation of the neotype designation of 2006 and suppression of T. dussumieriGray, 1831.
This article is only available to subscribers. It is not available for individual sale.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have
purchased or subscribe to this BioOne eBook Collection. You are receiving
this notice because your organization may not have this eBook access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users-please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
Additional information about institution subscriptions can be foundhere