BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 August 2006 Some Observations on the Hatinh langur, Trachypithecus laotum hatinhensis (), in North Central Vietnam
Nguyen Manh Ha
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Hatinh langur, Trachypithecus laotum hatinhensis (Dao, 1970), is one of the many Vietnamese primates on the brink of extinction due to hunting and the loss of its natural habitat. This black langur, distinguished by its white moustache and sideburns that extend behind the ears to the nape, inhabits the limestone forests of the Central Annamite Mountains. The Hatinh langur is diurnal and largely arboreal, and group sizes are 15 or more. Here we report on surveys carried out in 1998–1999 in Quang Binh Province to determine the population status of T. laotum hatinhensis. In Vietnam, it occurs only in the limestone areas of five districts in the Quang Binh Province and Huong Hoa District of Quang Tri Province. The most important population is in the Phong Nha–Ke Bang National Park of Quang Binh Province; the only Vietnamese protected area where it is known to occur. Some observations on the species ecology and behavior are also included.

Introduction

With more than 25 species and subspecies, Vietnam has the highest primate diversity of any country in Asia and the Indochina peninsula. Many are both endemic to Vietnam and endangered. Five of the world's most endangered primates are Vietnamese: the Cat Ba langur (Trachypithecus poliocephalus), Delacour's langur (Trachypithecus delacouri), the grey-shanked douc langur (Pygathrix cinerea), the Tonkin snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus avunculus), and eastern black crested gibbon (Nomascus nasutus) (Mittermeier et al. 2006). The Hatinh langur, Trachypithecus laotum hatinhensis (Dao, 1970) is also extremely threatened, being classified as Endangered on the 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN 2006). Once widespread in a number of north-central Vietnamese provinces, deforestation and hunting mean that its distribution is now severely limited, and until recently it was thought to remain in only a few districts of Quang Binh Province. In 2005, however, a new population was found in Huong Hoa District, Quang Tri Province (Bird Life International Vietnam Programme 2005). A report of its occurrence in Gia Lai, well to the south, is disputed (Lippold and Vu Ngoc Thanh 1995; Pham Nhat et al. 1996a, 1996b).

Taxonomy and Distribution

The first specimen of this subspecies was collected at the hamlet of Cuc, in Ha Tinh Province (Bourret 1942), and a second was collected by Dao Van Tien, in February 1964, in Minh Hoa District of Quang Binh Province. Dao Van Tien (1970) named it Presbytis francoisi hatinhensis. Corbet and Hill (1992) listed it as a subspecies of Semnopithecus francoisi, and a number of authors have referred to it as Trachypithecus francoisi hatinhensis (e.g., Le Xuan Canh 1992; Dang Huy Huynh et al. 1994; Fooden 1996; Pham Nhat et al. 1996a, 1996b; Pham Nhat 2002). Although Brandon-Jones et al. (2004) listed it as T. francoisi hatinhensis, he earlier (1995) considered it to be a species separate from francoisi. Groves (2001, 2005) listed it as a full species based on the phylogenetic species concept (see also Workman and Covert 2005). Molecular genetic studies (Roos et al. 2001; Roos 2004) aligned hatinhensis with laotum (Thomas, 1911), placing it as a subspecies, and the name T. laotum hatinhensis has since been used by Nadler et al. (2003), which is followed here.

Le Hien Hao (1973) noted that the Hatinh langur occurred in the districts of Con Cuong, Tuong Duong of Nghe An Province, and Nhu Xuan District of Thanh Hoa. Over the next 20 years, there was almost no additional information on this subspecies in the wild. In 1992, Le Xuan Canh announced that photos of the Hatinh langur had been taken at a site adjacent to a market in Phong Nha, Bo Trach District of Quang Binh Province. In 1993, the Zoological Museum of Hanoi University collected a specimen, but without specific information on its origin. At the same time, the Forestry University of Vietnam collected a skin in Minh Hoa District of Quang Binh Province. We also collected some specimens at Dai A, Phong Nha, in 1999 (currently preserved at The Zoological Museum of Hanoi National University). Surveys by Pham Nhat et al. (1996a, 1996b) indicated that the hamlet of Cuc, Tuyen Hoa District in Quang Binh (the locality where Bourret [1942] collected the species) was the northernmost locality, but that today it is probably extinct there as the remaining limestone forest is severely degraded. There may also be a small population of 20–30 animals in the Khe Net forest, Tuyen Hoa District, but this has yet to be confirmed (Nadler et al. 2003).

Lippold and Vu Ngoc Thanh (1995) recorded the Hatinh langur in Con Cha Rang Nature Reserve in Gia Lai Province (14°33′ N, 108°35′ E). This locality, well to the south of the recognized range, was discussed by Pham Nhat et al. (1996a, 1996b) and Nadler et al. (2003). Pham Nhat et al. (1996a) indicated that its presence there is questionable — it is well to the south of the sites they surveyed — and if the Hatinh langur does survive there it is likely to be a very small relict population. Nadler et al. (2003) concluded that the presence of the Hatinh langur in the Tay Nguyen Plateau would be a major extension of its range, and needs further investigation. Vu Ngoc Thanh himself (pers. comm. 2006) believes that it was a mistaken record.

It appears that in the recent past the distribution of this subspecies ranged broadly from Nghe An to Quang Binh (Le Hien Hao 1973). Surveys in the central region of Vietnam carried out since 1998 by a number of scientists of our organization have shown that the Hatinh langur is now restricted to Quang Binh (districts of Minh Hoa, Bo Trach, Tuyen Hoa, Le Thuy, and Quanh Ninh), with the exception of the newly discovered population in Quang Tri Province. From the evidence currently available it would seem that the main stronghold of this population is in the districts of Minh Hoa and Bo Trach, where a vast primary forest exists in limestone ranges, particularly in the Phong Nha–Ke Bang National Park (Nguyen Xuan Dang et al. 1998; Nguyen Manh Ha 1999, 2004; Timmins et al. 1999).

In total, 16 groups were recorded by our team in Phong Nha in 1998 and 1999. A group was observed at Kim Lu, Tuyen Hoa, and two others, with unknown numbers of individuals, were seen at Cha Tum (Dan Hoa, Minh Hoa) and at Khe Dan (Kim Thuy, Le Thuy) in 2003. In total, 19 groups have been observed in four different districts of Quang Binh Province (Table 1). Additional recent surveys conducted by other researchers in Thanh Hoa, Nghe An, and Ha Tinh provinces failed to find evidence of Hatinh langur, and research conducted by us in 2003 in Quang Tri (Dakrong District), Ha Tinh (Huong Son District), and Nghe An provinces (Pu Huong Nature Reserve and Pu Hoat proposed nature reserve) also provided no evidence of their presence. We conclude that, with the information we have to date, in Vietnam the Hatinh langurs are primarily restricted to Quang Binh Province, with a small population in at least one further site in Quang Tri Province.

Table 1.

List of Hatinh langur records and locations in Quang Binh Province, Vietnam.

i0898-6207-21-1-149-t01.gif

Nadler et al. (2003) reported that Hatinh langurs also occur in the west of Khammouan Province of Lao People's Democratic Republic. This is quite reasonable because Phong Nha–Ke Bang shares the same limestone range with Hin Namon of Laos.

Morphological Characteristics

Locally, the Hatinh langur is known as the long-tailed gibbon or black gibbon. They are large monkeys weighing between 6 kg and 9 kg, and differ from the otherwise similar Francois' langur in having the white cheek stripe extend behind the ear onto the nape. Other differences noted by Nadler et al. (2003, p. 47) include “the whorls on the head, the shape of the crest, and the white moustache connecting to the white cheek stripes.” Head/body lengths, tail lengths, and weights are shown in Table 2. Newborn infants have yellow fur, and begin turning black after two weeks. The infant is almost entirely black at three months.

Table 2.

Morphological characteristics of the Hatinh langur, Trachypithecus laotum hatinhensis1.

i0898-6207-21-1-149-t02.gif

Habitat

As recognized by a number of authors, these monkeys generally inhabit limestone forests (Osgood 1932; Dao Van Tien 1989; Pham Nhat 2002; Nadler et al. 2003) and our research since 1998 has corroborated this finding. The Hatinh langur preferentially inhabits areas with dense forest cover, but they also forage and move about in more open areas. Dense forests cover approximately 90% of their range in the limestone hills of Phong Nha, Kim Lu, and Dan Hoa of Quang Binh Province. It is when they forage in open environments that it is possible to observe them. It is quite possible, however, that their current preference for these limestone forests is now largely an artefact of the pressures from widespread habitat loss and fragmentation and hunting (Li and Rogers 2005). The term “limestone langurs” was coined, it would seem, during an international symposium on the conservation of Vietnamese primates held at the Cuc Phuong National Park, 18–21 November 2003. Groves (2004) pointed out that this is a useful and ecologically descriptive collective for seven species of langur that are today associated with limestone forests but does not, it would seem, reflect a coevolution of these primates with these particular forests (Li and Rogers 2005).

Breeding and Group Structure

Hatinh langurs have been observed in a number of different social group structures. Group size generally ranges from two to 15 individuals (Nguyen Manh Ha 1999; Pham Nhat 2002), but groups of up to 30 individuals have been observed in Kim Lu, Tuyen Hoa of Quang Binh Province. The group structure normally includes one male and three or four females and their immature offspring (Nguyen Manh Ha 1999), but this may vary in relation to hunting pressure and the quality of the habitat. Hunting severely affects the social structure and number of individuals in the groups. In 1999 and 2000, for instance, during our survey in Phong Nha, local hunters reported that they had gunned down at least three entire groups of Hatinh langurs in Co Khu, Dai Cao, Hung Xuong of Phong Nha, and most of the Hatinh langur groups in Phong Nha and Dan Hoa were diminished due to illegal hunting in the area (Nguyen Manh Ha 1999). Other than the loss that hunted individuals represent to the population, skewed sex ratios and isolation from other groups caused by hunting can have a serious negative impact on population viability. Isolation caused by habitat fragmentation is also a serious concern, presumably affecting group composition due to lack of opportunities for dispersing individuals.

Females give birth to single offspring (Pham Nhat 2002) and breed all year round. Research has shown that births occur at different times of the year; for instance, at Phong Nha they have been recorded in July 1998, February and March 1999, July 2002, August 2003; at Dan Hoa in April 2004; and in Kim Lu in May and June 2004. Pham Nhat (2002) recorded births in August in the Endangered Primate Rescue Center, Cuc Phuong, and in November (probably in Phong Nha). There is a peak in births in the summer and spring, however, when food is abundant, the climate is warmer, and there is less rainfall (Nguyen Manh Ha 1999; Pham Nhat 2002).

Sleeping Sites and Other Behaviors

The sleeping sites are one of the most interesting features of this langur's behavior because of their location. They use the same sleeping sites for many years if there is no disturbance or hunting. Some groups in Tro Muong area, Phong Nha National Park, for example, have not changed their sleeping sites since 1998. They are usually in small caves and crevices in limestone escarpments or even in large limestone caves. The caves provide protection from the rain during the wet season and the cold north wind in the winter, as well as from their natural predators. A hunter in Phong Nha informed us that he shot a yellow-throated marten (Martes flavigula) in the Dai Cao area while it was eating a female Hatinh langur that it had presumably killed (this Hatinh langur is preserved in The Zoological Museum of Hanoi National University).

Hatinh langurs seem to prefer cliffs facing west or southwest over those oriented in other directions (Tro Muong, Hang En, Kim Lu, Dan Hoa), a feature that may relate to these cliffs being the warmest location in the late afternoon. The height of sleeping caves on the cliffs is generally about 20 m from the base, but can be up to 50 m. The most remarkable aspect of a typical sleeping cave is the orange or dark-yellow stains below the entrances, the result of urine and the feces that the langurs excrete at night (Fig. 1). The distinctive stain and the strong smell associated with the entrances to these caves and crevices indicate their constant and frequent use by the langurs. Wang et al. (2005) noted that the stains on limestone escarpment sleeping sites of Trachypithecus leucocephalus became darker after a sleeping site was abandoned.. They noted that if stains were wet then the site was in use, as these dry up after about only one month. Wang et al. (2005) found that it was easy to recognize these sleeping sites even after some 10 years of abandonment. Unfortunately, these sleeping sites facilitate the illegal hunting of this species.

Figure 1.

A limestone escarpment, sleeping site of a group of Hatinh langur, T. laotum hatinhensis, at Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, Quang Binh Province. Photograph by Nguyen Manh Ha.

i0898-6207-21-1-149-f01.jpg

The time of leaving or arriving at sleeping sites is different for each langur group, but quite consistent for each group if there is no evidence of danger or unusual disturbance at the site. Although they usually return to their sleeping sites from 18:15 to 19:00, the time varies seasonally, and depends, for example, on the direction the caves face and their elevation, aspects that determine when the sun reaches or leaves the escarpment (Nguyen Manh Ha 1999).

Langurs often return to the vicinity of the sleeping site quite early, around 16:00, and rest and play in the area until entering the caves at dusk. Observation conditions are excellent at this time, and it is then that it is possible to perceive social interactions and to identify the leader of the group. The dominant animal is often aggressive toward juvenile males, and is also the one to initiate movement toward the sleeping site. When he makes a “huut … huut” sound, repeating it two or three times, the langur group begins to move into their sleeping caves and crevices. When moving down the cliff, the group always travels in single file along a crevice in the rock face or along a tree root. The “huut … huut” vocalization is also used as an alarm call when a langur sees something unusual or recognizes danger.

Members of the social groups do not share a single sleeping cave, rather the adults separate off; sometimes two animals share a small cave, and on only one occasion did we observe three sleeping together (Hang En of Phong Nha–Ke Bang National Park). This behavior was also confirmed by a local hunter. Individual sleeping sites may be a hole or crevice in the rock or a small cave on the limestone cliffs or on the roof of a big limestone cave (as, for instance, at Hang En and Dai A).

Langurs leave their sleeping caves early; at dawn. It seems that the departure time depends on daylight, because in the summer they leave earlier than in the winter, and the cold weather in the winter may be another factor (Hatinh groups in Tro Muong, for instance). The dominant male is always the one to lead the way when they leave their sleeping caves, and when they return in the evening. This behavior can be observed regularly at the same place with the same groups if the langurs do not perceive any danger.

As with all catarrhines, the Hatinh langur is diurnal and feeds during the day. However, it is difficult to make close-up observations of the langurs when they are traveling because they are always in the forest canopy of the limestone slopes, the terrain is difficult, and they are very vigilant as to the presence of humans. It is quite difficult, as such, to approach them to observe their behaviors, especially their feeding. As with other Vietnamese monkeys such as doucs (Pygathrix) and Tonkin snub-nose monkeys (Rhinopithecus avunculus), there is as little or no available information on feeding and ranging of Hatinh langurs in the wild.

Population Numbers

We have insufficient data for any accurate estimation of the size of the remaining populations of the Hatinh langur. Twenty groups with 152 individuals were recorded during our surveys. Sixteen of these groups were in Phong Nha. Based on our survey, the most important population is distributed along the Phong Nha–Ke Bang limestone range in Phong Nha–Ke Bang National Park. This national park is currently the only protected area for this langur. The Phong Nha Nature Reserve is 41,132 ha; 24,861 ha of which are limestone forest (Pham Nhat et al. 1996a). Other smaller populations can be found in some limestone areas in Minh Hoa, Tuyen Hoa, Le Thuy, and Quang Ninh districts, all of which are isolated.

Threats to the Survival of Hatinh Langurs

The Hatinh langur is one of the most threatened primates in Vietnam due to its continuously declining population. It is listed as Endangered in the Red Data Book of Vietnam and likewise Endangered on the 2006 IUCN Red List (IUCN 2006). As is the case for all primates in Vietnam, the Hatinh langur faces two main threats.

In the districts of Minh Hoa, Bo Trach, and Tuyen Hoa in Quang Binh Province, the Hatinh langur is targeted by hunters for wildlife trade (Fig. 2). The langur and its parts are being traded and used for traditional medicine known as balm in English or “Cao Khi” in Vietnamese. There is no information, however, concerning the international trade or trade in live individuals. Hunting remains the most serious threat to this langur. Despite being illegal throughout its range, this activity continues because hunters consider it an easy prey due to its habit of returning to easily identifiable sleeping sites each night.

Figure 2.

Male and female (with infant) Hatinh langurs, T. laotum hatinhensis, were confiscated near the Phong Nha Nature Reserve from a market in the Phong Nha commune, Quang Binh Province in 1997. Photograph by Nguyen Manh Ha.

i0898-6207-21-1-149-f02.jpg

Habitat loss is the second main threat. This langur is heavily dependent on limestone forests, which are in continuous decline. They continue to be cut, and are becoming increasingly fragmented. Forest clearance and new roads in the limestone landscape make permanent barriers, and further isolate the remaining langur populations. This isolation makes dispersal difficult or impossible, and undoubtedly increases the mortality of dispersing males, and may well lead to inbreeding among the remaining langur groups.

Conclusions

The Hatinh langur is endemic to the limestone landscapes of the Central Annamite Mountains. It is highly social, generally living in groups of 2–15 individuals, it is diurnal and largely arboreal; and the preferred habitat is the limestone forests of this region. In Vietnam, the langur occurs only in the limestone areas of five districts in Quang Binh province, along with the Huong Hoa district of Quang Tri Province. The wild population is declining due to hunting and the loss and fragmentation of their natural habitat. Suitable habitats are now restricted to limestone mountain forest in the two provinces, the most important population being located in Phong Nha–Ke Bang National Park; the only protected area where it is known to occur. There may also be a small population of 20–30 animals in the Khe Net forest, Tuyen Hoa District, but this has yet to be confirmed (Nadler et al. 2003).

Recommendations

The Hatinh langur is one of the most threatened primates in Vietnam and appropriate measures and programs for its protection are urgently needed. We recommend the following:

  • Strong measures need be taken to eliminate the illegal hunting of this langur and other wildlife in this region, and strict punishments need be applied to those participating in illegal hunting or trading not only for this langur and its parts but for all illegal wildlife trade activities.

  • The Phong Nha–Ke Bang National Park has the most important remaining population of the Hatinh langur and is, besides, the only protected area where it occurs. The park should be increased in size to include limestone areas to its northwest (see also Pham Nhat et al. 1996a).

  • Conservation education campaigns increasing the profile and stressing the value of Hatinh langurs and wildlife in general are urgently needed for the local communities and villages within their known range.

  • Surveys are needed to map the remaining limestone forests of the region and to better understand the size and distribution of the remaining Hatinh langur populations in the wild.

  • A detailed, long-term study on the demography, ecology, and behavior of the Hatinh langur should be set up. This should also address the extent and dynamics of the threats they face, which will be crucial for implementing a longterm conservation strategy.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Primate Society of Great Britain (PSGB), the American Society of Primatologists (ASP), and the Centre for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Vietnam National University, which generously provided funding for this research. We also thank the Forest Protection Department of Vietnam, Provincial Forest Protection departments of Quang Binh, Quang Tri, Nghe An, and Ha Tinh for providing access to field sites and assistance for our research team. We are most grateful to our friends, colleagues, and the local people that helped and provided us with valuable information for the research. Finally, we thank Herbert H. Covert of the University of Colorado, Boulder, Ben Rawson, Australian National University, Canberra, and Anthony B. Rylands, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science at Conservation International, for their kindness, advice and help in editing this paper.

Literature Cited

1.

Bird Life International Vietnam Programme 2005. The rare Hatinh langur discovered in Quang Tri province for the first time. Press Release. Website:  http://www.birdlifeindochina.org/. Accessed 23 November 2005. Google Scholar

2.

R. Bourret 1942. Les mammifères de la collection du laboratoire de zoologie de L'École Supérieur des Sciences. Nat. Trav. École Sup. Sci. Univ. Indochina, Hanoi 1:1–44. Google Scholar

3.

D. Brandon-Jones 1995. A revision of the Asian pied leaf monkeys (Mammalia: Cercopithecidae: Superspecies Semnopithecus auratus), with a description of a new subspecies. Raffles Bull. Zool 43:3–43. Google Scholar

4.

D. Brandon-Jones, A. A. Eudey, T. Geissmann, C. P. Groves, D. J. Melnick, J. C. Morales, M. Shekelle, and C-B. Stewart . 2004. Asian primate classification. Int. J. Primatol 23:97–164. Google Scholar

5.

G. B. Corbet and J. E. Hill . 1992. The Mammals of the Indomalayan Region: A Systematic Review. Natural History Museum Publications, Oxford University Press. Oxford. Google Scholar

6.

Huy Huynh Dang, Van Tien Dao, Van Sung Cao, Trong Anh Phạm, and Minh Khien Hoang . 1994. Danh lục thú Việt Nam [List of mammals of Vietnam]. Nxb KHKT, Hà Nôị. Google Scholar

7.

Van Tien Dao 1970. Sur les formes de semnopithèque noir, Presbytis francoisi (Colobidae, Primates) au Vietnam et description d'une forme nouvelle. Mitt. Zool. Mus. Berlin 46:61–65. Google Scholar

8.

Tien Dao Van 1989. On the trends of the evolutionary radiation on the Tonkin leaf monkey (Presbytis francoisi, Primates, Cercopithecidae). J. Hum. Evol 4:501–507. Google Scholar

9.

J. Fooden 1996. Zoogeography of Vietnamese primates. Int. J. Primatol 17:5845–899. Google Scholar

10.

C. P. Groves 2001. Primate Taxonomy. Smithonian Institution Press. Washington, DC. Google Scholar

11.

C. P. Groves 2004. Taxonomy and biogeography of primates in Vietnam and neighbouring regions. In Conservation of Primates in Vietnam. T. Nadler, U. Streicher, and Ha Thanh Long , editors. (eds.), pp. 15–22.Frankfurt Zoological Society. Hanoi. Google Scholar

12.

C. P. Groves 2005. Order Primates. In Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. 3rd EdVol. 1: D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder , editors. (eds.), pp. 111–184.Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, Maryland. Google Scholar

13.

IUCN 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN — The World Conservation Union, Species Survival Commission (SSC). Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Website: < www.redlist.org>. Accessed 26 July 2006. Google Scholar

14.

Hao Le Hien 1973. Thú kinh tệ miệà̆n Bệc Việt Nam [Economic mammal of Northern Vietnam]. Nxb KHKT, Hà Nô̇i. Google Scholar

15.

Canh Le Xuan 1992. Evidence for the existence of Trachypithecus francoisi hatinhensis. Asian Primate Newsl 2:3–4. Google Scholar

16.

L. K. Lippold and Thanh Vu Ngoc . 1995. A new location for Trachypithecus francoisi hatinhensis. Asian Primates 4:46–8. Google Scholar

17.

Z. Y. Li and M. E. Rogers . 2005. Are limestone hills a refuge or essential habitat for white-headed langurs in Fusui, China. Int. J. Primatol 26:2437–452. Google Scholar

18.

R. A. Mittermeier, C. Valladares-Pádua, A. B. Rylands, A. A. Eudey, T. M. Butynski, J. U. Ganzhorn, R. Kormos, J. M. Aguiar, and S. Walker . (eds.). 2006. Primates in peril: The world's 25 most endangered primates 2004–2006. Primate Conserv 201–28. Google Scholar

19.

T. Nadler, F. Momberg, Xuan Dang Nguyen, and N. Lormee . 2003. Leaf Monkeys: Vietnam Primate Conservation Status Review 2002 – Part 2. Frankfurt Zoological Society Cuc Phuong National Park Conservation Program, Fauna and Flora International, Vietnam Program. Fauna and Flora International, Asia Pacific Program, Hanoi. Google Scholar

20.

Manh Ha Nguyen 1999. Primate fauna and ecology of Hatinh langur (Trachypithecus francoisi hatinhensis) in Phong Nha – Ke Bang Nature Reserve, Quang Binh Province. Forestry Engineer thesis. Forestry University of Vietnam, Xuan Mai, Ha Tay. Vietnam. Google Scholar

21.

Manh Ha Nguyen 2004. Some result of primate survey in Quang Binh province. Sci. Technol. J. Agric. Rural Dev 2:38263–264. Google Scholar

22.

Xuan Dang Nguyen, Nhat Pham, Trong Anh Pham, and D. K. Hendrichsen . 1998. Kết quả diều tra nghiên cúu khu hệ thú ở Phong Nha Keả Bàng (Quảng Bình) 17–25/9/1998 [result of mammal study in Phong nha-Ke Bang (Quang Binh) 1/7–25/9/1998]. Fauna and Flora International Indochina và Viện Sinh thái và Tài nguyên Sinh vật, Hà Nô̇i. Google Scholar

23.

W. H. Osgood 1932. Mammals of the Kelley-Roosevelts and Delacour Asiatic expeditions. Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool 18:193–339. Google Scholar

24.

Nhat Pham, Tuoc Do, and Van La Truong . 1996a. Preliminary survey for Hatinh langur in North Central Vietnam. Asian Primates 6:3–413–17. Google Scholar

25.

Nhat Pham, Tuoc Do, and Van La Truong . 1996b. A survey for Hatinh langur (Trachypithecus francoisi hatinhensis) in North Central Vietnam. Report to WWF Indochina Programme. Hanoi and Primate Conservation, Inc. Charlestown, Rhode Island. Google Scholar

26.

Nhat Pḥm 2002. Thú linh tru'ỏng Việt Nam [Primates of Vietnam]. Nxb Nêng Nghiệp, Hà Nội. Google Scholar

27.

S. Roberton 2004. An Assessment of the Threats to the Biodiversity of Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, Quang Binh Province, Vietnam Report, Fauna and Flora International, Vietnam Program, Hanoi. pp. Google Scholar

28.

C. Roos 2004. Molecular evolution and systematics of Vietnamese primates. In Conservation of Primates in Vietnam. T. Nadler, U. Streicher, and Ha Thang Long , editors. (eds.), pp. 23–28.Frankfurt Zoological Society. Hanoi. Google Scholar

29.

C. Roos, T. Nadler, Y. Zhang, and H. Zischler . 2001. Molecular evolution and distribution of the superspecies Trachypithecus [francoisi]. Folia Primatol 72:181–182. (Abstract). Google Scholar

30.

R. J. Timmins, Tuoc Do, Viet Cuong Trinh, and D. K. Hendrichsen . 1999. A preliminary assessment of the conservation importance and conservation priorities of the Phong Nha–Ke Bang National Park, Quang Binh Province, Vietnam. Report. Fauna and Flora International, Indochina Programme. Hanoi. Google Scholar

31.

D. Wang, Ran Wenzhongh, Jin Tong, and Pan Wenshi . 2005. Population census of the white-headed langur (Trachypithecus leucocephalus) at Longrui Karst Hills, Guangxi, China. Primates 46:219–222. Google Scholar

32.

C. Workman and H. H. Covert . 2005. Learning the ropes: The ontogeny of locomotion in red-shanked douc (Pygathrix nemaeus), Delacour's (Trachypithecus delacouri), and Hatinh langurs (Trachypithecus hatinhensis) I. Positional behavior. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 128:371–380. Google Scholar
Nguyen Manh Ha "Some Observations on the Hatinh langur, Trachypithecus laotum hatinhensis (), in North Central Vietnam," Primate Conservation 2006(21), 149-154, (1 August 2006). https://doi.org/10.1896/0898-6207.21.1.149
Received: 1 August 2005; Published: 1 August 2006
KEYWORDS
distribution
Hatinh langur
hunting
limestone habitats
protected area
sleeping site
Vietnam
Back to Top