A quantitative process for the conservation analysis of 179 endangered birds of China is presented. At first, for each bird species its conservation priority status was assessed by calculating its conservation priority index (CPI), using six protection attributes (e.g. extinction risk, taxonomic uniqueness, public appeal). Second, based on the birds' conservation status, prioritisation by alternative approaches was performed. A hotspot score, a heuristic and an optimisation approach were used. The territory of China was divided into 583 grid cells (1° ×1°). The efficiency of the current network of protected areas was tested by comparing it with data obtained from prioritization. Analyses indicated that 28 species should be classified as highest conservation priorities, 13 of them were recommended for inclusion to the national wildlife protection list. The optimisation method for area selection was shown to be superior to the heuristic and hotspot approaches, since it selected more currently unreserved high priority areas whilst keeping the total number of sites low. It is proposed that seven Important Bird Areas (IBA's) should be added to the current protected area network. The suggested avian conservation assessment procedure can identify previously overlooked endangered bird species and candidate priority areas for conservation throughout comparative approaches.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2007
Prioritizing Avian Conservation Areas in China by Hotspot Scoring, Heuristics and Optimisation
You-Hua Chen
P. Abellán
,
D. Sánchez-Fernández
,
J. Velasco
,
A. Millán
2005. Conservation of freshwater biodiversity: a comparison of different area selection methods. Biodiv. Conserv. 14: 3457–3474. Google Scholar
M. B. Araujo
1999. Distribution patterns of biodiversity and the design of a representative reserve network in Portugal. Divers. Distrib. 5: 151–163. Google Scholar
M. Beger
,
G. P. Jones
,
P. L. Munday
2003. Conservation of coral reef biodiversity: a comparison of reserve selection procedures for corals and fishes. Biol. Conserv. 111: 53– 62. Google Scholar
J. M. R. Benayas
,
E. Montaña
2003. Identifying areas of highvalue vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation. Biol. Conserv. 114: 357–370. Google Scholar
M. A. Burgman
,
D.A. Keith
,
T. V. Walshe
1999. Uncertainty in comparative risk analysis for threatened Australian plant species. Risk Anal. 19: 585–598. Google Scholar
T. H. Cheng
(eds).
2000. A complete checklist of species and subspecies of the Chinese birds. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar
T. H. Cheng
,
Z. Y. Long
,
T. C. Lu
(eds).
1995. Fauna Sinica. Aves. Vol. X. Passeriformes, Muscicapidae I. Turdinae. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar
T. H. Cheng
,
Z. Y. Long
,
B. L. Zheng
(eds).
1987. Fauna Sinica. Aves. Vol. XI. Passeriformes, Muscicapidae II. Timallinae. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar
T. H. Cheng
,
Y. K. Tan
,
T. C. Lu
(eds).
1978. Fauna Sinica. Aves. Vol. IV. Galliformes. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar
T. H. Cheng
,
Y. H. Xian
,
G. X. Guan
(eds).
1991. Fauna Sinica. Aves. Vol. VI. Columbiformes, Psittaciformes, Cuculiformes and Strigiformes. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar
H. Cofre
,
P. A. Marquet
1999. Conservation status, rarity, and geographic priorities for conservation of Chilean mammals: an assessment. Biol. Conserv. 88: 53–68. Google Scholar
A. Das
,
J. Krishnaswamy
,
K. S. Bawa
,
M. C. Kiran
,
V. Srinivas
,
N. S. Kumar
,
K. U. Karanth
2006. Prioritisation of conservation areas in the Western Ghats, India. Biol. Conserv. 133: 16–31. Google Scholar
U. Dhar
,
R. S. Rawal
,
J. Upreti
2000. Setting priorities for conservation of medicinal plants — a case study in the Indian Himalaya. Biol. Conserv. 95: 57–65. Google Scholar
J. R. Dunk
,
W. J. Zielinski
,
H. H. Welsh
2006. Evaluating reserves for species richness and representation in northern California. Divers. Distrib. 12: 434–442. Google Scholar
H. A. Eeley
,
M. J. Lawes
,
B. Reyers
2001. Priority areas for conservation of subtropical indigenous forest in southern Africa: a case study from KwaZulu-Natal. Biodivers. Conserv. 10: 1221–1246. Google Scholar
N. J. Fox
,
L. E. Beckley
2005. Priority areas for conservation of Western Australian coastal fishes: a comparison of hotspot, biogeographical and complementarity approaches. Biol. Conserv. 125: 399–410. Google Scholar
D. R. Given
,
D. A. Norton
1993. A multivariate approach to assessing threat and for priority setting in threatened species conservation. Biol. Conserv. 64: 57–66. Google Scholar
E. Greenbaum
,
O. Komar
2005. Threat Assessment and Conservation Prioritization of the Herpetofauna of EI Salvador. Biodiv. Conserv. 14: 2377–2395. Google Scholar
P. C. Griffin
1999. Endangered species diversity ‘hotspots’ in Russia and centers of endemism. Biodiv. Conserv. 8: 495–511. Google Scholar
F. M. Lei
,
Y. H. Qu
,
Q. Q. Tang
,
S. C. An
2003. Priorities for the conservation of avian biodiversity in China based on the distribution patterns of endemic bird genera. Biodiv. Conserv. 12: 2487–2501. Google Scholar
LINDO Systems, Inc., Industrial LINDO/PC release 6.1. 1999. LINDO Systems, Inc. Chicago, USA Google Scholar
A. T. Lombard
,
C. Hiton-Taylor
,
A. G. Rebelo
,
R. L. Pressey
,
R. M. Cowling
1999. Reserve selection in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa: coping with high compositional turnover. Plant Ecol. 142: 35–55. Google Scholar
J. MacKinnon
,
K. Phillipps
,
F. Q. He
(eds).
2000. A Field Guide to the Birds of China (Chinese translation). Hunan Educational Press, Changsha, China. Google Scholar
A. Pérez-Arteaga
,
S. E Jackson
,
E. Carrera
,
K. J. Gaston
2005. Priority sites for wildfowl conservation in Mexico. Anim. Conserv. 8: 41–50. Google Scholar
R. L. Pressey
2002. Classics in physical geography revisited. Prog. Phys. Geog. 26: 434–441. Google Scholar
R. L. Pressey
,
A. O. Nicholls
1989. Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches. Biol. Conserv. 50: 199–218. Google Scholar
A. S. Rodrigues
,
J. O. Cerdeira
,
K. J. Gaston
2000. Flexibility, efficiency, and accountability: adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problems. Ecography 23: 565–574. Google Scholar
J. P. Rodriguez
,
F. Rojas-Suárez
,
C. J. Shape
2004. Setting priorities for the conservation of Venezuela's threatened birds. Oryx 38: 373–382. Google Scholar
H. Sarakinos
,
A. O. Nicholls
,
A. Tubert
,
A. Aggarwal
,
C. R. Margules
,
S. Sarkar
2001. Area prioritization for biodiversity conservation in Québec on the basis of species distributions: a preliminary analysis. Biodiv. Conserv. 10: 1419–1472. Google Scholar
S. Sfenthourakis
,
A. Legakis
2001. Hotspots of endemic terrestrial invertebrates in southern Greece. Biodiv. Conserv. 10: 1387–1417. Google Scholar
J. M. Thiollay
2002. Bird diversity and selection of protected areas in a large neotropical forest tract. Biodiv. Conserv. 11: 1377–1395. Google Scholar
J. K. Turpie
,
L. E. Beckley
,
S. M. Katua
2000. Biogeography and selection of priority areas for conservation of South African coastal fishes. Biol. Conserv. 92: 59–72. Google Scholar
S. Wang
,
Y. Xie
(eds).
2004. China Species Red List. Vol. I–III. Higher Education Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar
P. Williams
,
D. Gibbons
,
C. Margules
,
A. Rebelo
,
C. Humphries
,
R. Pressey
1996. A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conserv. Biol. 10: 155–174. Google Scholar
A. G. Wolman
2006. Measurement and meaningfulness in conservation science. Conserv. Biol. 20: 1626–1634. Google Scholar
Z. Xie
2003. Characteristics and conservation priority of threatened plants in the Yangtze valley. Biodiv. Conserv. 12: 65–72. Google Scholar
J. Y. Yip
,
R. T. Corlett
,
D. Dudgeon
2004. A fine-scale gap analysis of the existing protected area system in Hong Kong, China. Biodiv. Conserv. 13: 943–957. Google Scholar
J. Y. Yip
,
R. T. Corlett
,
D. Dudgeon
2006. Selecting small reserves in a human-dominated landscape: A case study of Hong Kong, China. J. Environ. Manage. 78: 86–96. Google Scholar

Acta Ornithologica
Vol. 42 • No. 2
December 2007
Vol. 42 • No. 2
December 2007
area prioritization
avian conservation priority
biodiversity
China
Complementarity
hotspots