BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 1995 Developmental Pattern of Androgen Receptor Immunoreactivity in the Mouse Submandibular Gland
Kazuhiko Sawada, Tetsuo Noumura
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We studied the immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in the mouse submandibular gland, and developmental profiles of its expression using polyclonal human androgen receptor antibody. In the submandibular glands of both sexes, specific immunoreactivity appeared only in cell nuclei of the acini, the intercalated ducts, the granular convoluted tubules (GCT) and the excretory striated ducts. The percentage of immunoreactive cells in each region gradually declined with age during the first 90 days of postnatal development studied. The sexual difference in the percentage of immunoreactive cells was oberserved in the acini on days 20 and 30 and in the GCT on day 30. Incidence of immunoreactive cells in the female was significantly smaller than that in the male. On day 60, the percentage of immunoreactive cells of these two regions turned to increase slightly in the female but continued to decline in the male, and then it became higher in the female than in the male. In addition, one-week castration did not cause any changes in the intracellular distribution of androgen receptor and the percentage of immunoreactive cells in each region of the adult gland.

These results suggest that androgen receptor is localized primarily in cell nuclei in all four regions of the mouse submandibular gland in situ, and that its expression in acini and GCT is superior in the male around days 20 to 30, when sex difference of the gland becomes evident.

INTRODUCTION

In rodents, the male submandibular gland is larger than the female one and has a more complex morphology. Biologically active polypeptides, including nerve growth factor, epidermal growth factor, renin and proteases, are contained in higher concentration in the male gland, being more responsive to androgens [1, 2, 8, 12, 13, 16, 19, 26, 36]. The adult gland consists of the acini, the intercalated ducts (ID), the granular convoluted tubules (GCT) and the excretory striated ducts (SD). Among these structures, the male GCT are much more developed than the female GCT [23]. On the basis of histological, ultrastructural and morphometrical studies, both sexes in rats and mice undergo a similar morphogenesis of the gland during perinatal development, and then the sex difference appears at 3–4 weeks of age, when GCT grow more rapidly in the male than in the female [9, 11, 15, 28]. In a completely androgen-independent state (e.g., neonatal castration or androgen-insensitive testicular feminization mutation), the glands carry out the feminine development [28, 29]. The masculine development of the gland is caused by circulating androgens: 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) induces cell proliferation of GCT around day 20, and then both testosterone and DHT cause morphologically masculine development and maintain GCT in fully-stimulated states [30, 32].

The mouse submandibular gland is suggested biochemically to contain both cytosolic and nuclear androgen receptors [18, 20, 32, 34]. Physico-chemical properties of androgen receptors in the mouse submandibular gland have been studied by binding assays. But the binding assays lack a detailed information of the cellular and subcellular localization of the receptor. Therefore, using a polyclonal human androgen receptor antibody, this study examined the immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in four regions (acini, ID, GCT and SD) of the mouse submandibular gland in the course of postnatal development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

CD-1 mice were obtained from Charles River Japan Co. and maintained by random mating in our laboratory. The animals were given a commercial diet (CRF-1: Charles River Japan Co.) and tap water ad libitum and were kept at 23 ± 1°C under 12 hr artificial illumination (from 8:00 to 20:00).

Immunohistochemical staining for androgen receptor

In the first group, adult male mice were castrated or subjected to sham-operation 1 week before killing. At 90 days of age, animals were killed and submandibular glands and epididymides were removed. In the second group, mice of both sexes were killed under ether anesthesia on days 0 (at birth), 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 90, and submandibular glands were removed. Tissues were immediately embedded in O.C.T. compound (Miles Inc.), frozen and cut at 8 μm with a cryostat (Cryocut E, Reichert-Jung). Sections were mounted directly onto gelatin-coated slide, fixed in 3.7% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) for 30 min, and rinsed with 10 mM phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.2). After preincubation with 2% normal goat serum in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, sections were incubated for 24 hr at 4°C with polyclonal human androgen receptor antibody (Affinity Bio Reagents), which was raised by immunization to rabbits with a 62 kDa fusion protein from the N-terminal domain of the human androgen receptor expressed by bacteria [46]. As a control, the primary antibody was replaced with normal rabbit serum (NRS) at a dilution of 1:16,000. No positive signals were detected in the epididymis and submandibular gland by reaction with NRS. Preabsorption test of this antibody was omitted because the antibody could specifically detect the mouse androgen receptor as described previously [33]. Sections were rinsed with PBS, and incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody. The immunoreactive products were detected by an Avidinconjugated peroxidase kit (Vectastain ABC kit: Vector Lab., Inc.), using 0.05% 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (Sigma Chemical Co.) in 0.01% H2O2 as a chromogen. As final step, the sections were rinsed with PBS and coverslipped with 7% gelatin in 50%glycerol (vol/vol). Immunoreactivity in four regions (acini, ID, GCT and SD) of the submandibular gland was shown by the percentage of the number of immunoreactive cells per 500–1,000 cells counted.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney's U-test.

RESULTS

Effect of castration on immunohistochemical expression of androgen receptor in adult epididymis and submandibular gland

In the epididymis in sham-operated male mice at 90 days of age, the immunopositive products were detected in the cell nuclei, not in the perikaryal cytoplasm of both the epithelial and stromal cells (Fig. 1a). Castration did not induce any distinct changes in the intracellular distribution of the immunoreactive products (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1

Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in the epididymis and the submandibular gland in castrated or sham-operated mice. Mice were castrated or subjected to the sham-operation one week before killing, and were killed at 90 days of age. Nuclei in the epididymal epithelial and stromal cells reacted with the polyclonal human androgen receptor antibody. In the submandibular gland, cell nuclei in acini, intercalated ducts (ID), granular convoluted tubules (GCT) and excretory striated ducts (SD) also reacted. (a) Epididymis in sham-operated mouse. (b) Epididymis in castrated mouse. (c) Submandibular gland in sham-operated mouse. (d) Submandibular gland in castrated mouse. Bar = 50 μm.

i0289-0003-12-2-243-f01.gif

As observed in the epididymysis, the immunopositive materials were also found only in the cell nuclei, not in the perikaryal cytoplasm, of all four regions (acini, ID, GCT and SD) in the submandibular gland of sham-operated males (Fig. 1c). The percentage of immunoreactive cells in acini, ID, GCT and SD was 64.4 ± 1.32%, 78.8 ± 1.57%, 68.3 ± 0.75% and 77.0 ± 0.89% (n = 3), respectively. In the submandibular gland, castration had no influence on the intracellular distribution of the immunopositive products (Fig. 1d) and the occurrence of immunoreactive cells (acini = 65.1 ± 1.03%, ID = 79.1 ± 1.00%, GCT = 72.8 ± 2.26%. SD = 77.2 ± 0.80% (n = 3)).

Ontogeny of immunohistochemical expression of androgen receptor in submandibular gland

In neonatal mice, the submandibular glands of both sexes were composed of the developing acini and ID. In newborn acini, signals showing androgen receptor were found in almost all the cells (Fig. 2a, b). The percentage of immunoreactive cells in acini decreased gradually with age and fell to approximately 63% in the male and 69% in the female at 90 days of age although decreased significantly in the female at 20 and 30 days of age compared to that in the male (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2

Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptor in the mouse submandibular gland. Cell nuclei in the acini, the intercalated ducts (ID), the granular convoluted tubules (GCT) and the excretory striated ducts (SD) positively reacted with the polyclonal human androgen receptor antibody. (a) 0-day-old male. (b) 0-day-old female. (c) 20-day-old male. (d) 20-day-old female. (e) 30-day-old-male. (f) 30-day-old female. (g) 90-day-old male. (h) 90-day-old female. Bar = 50 μm.

i0289-0003-12-2-243-f02.gif

Fig. 3

Developmental changes in the percentage of androgen receptor-immunoreactive cells per 500–1,000 cells counted in the acini, the intercalated ducts (ID), the excretory striated ducts (SD) and the granular convoluted tubules (GCT) of the mouse submandibular gland. Values are mean ± S.E.M., n = 3 per group. *: P < 0.05 vs. age-matched female (Mann-Whitney's U-test).

i0289-0003-12-2-243-f03.gif

At birth, 75–78% of the ID cells in both sexes showed positive signals in cell nuclei (Fig. 3). The percentage of immunoreactive ID cells slightly increased until 10 days, then gradually declined through 20 days. No sexual difference was observed at any ages examined (Fig. 3).

SD cells, composed of a layer of cuboidal and low columnar cells, began to appear at 5 days, when positive nuclear immunostaining was observed in 81–84% of them (Fig. 3). The percentage of immunoreactive cells was constant and showed no sexual difference at any ages examined (Fig. 3).

GCT cells, consisting of a layer of low columnar cells began to appear at 20 days and 80–83% of them were positively reacted (Figs. 2c, d and 3). Then GCT cells developed to tall columnar or pyramidal cells by 30 days (Fig. 2e, f). In the male, the percentage of immunoreactive cells in GCT increased to approximately 93% at 30 days, but then decreased to 66% by 60 days and remained at the level until 90 days. In contrast, the percentage of immunoreactive cells in the female decreased to 72% at 30 days and the level maintained until 90 days. Therefore, it became significantly lower in the male than in the female on days 60 and 90 (Fig. 2g, h and 3).

DISCUSSION

In the present study, the androgen receptorimmunoreactivity was observed only in cell nuclei in murine epididymis and submandibular gland (Fig. 1). This result showed that androgen receptor was localized primarily in cell nuclei, not in the perikaryal cytoplasm in the androgen target cells in situ. This finding is in agreement with previous studies in liver, kidney, brain, reproductive organs, and other tissues in rats [3, 14, 24, 25, 27, 35], mice [33] and human [27], and demonstrated that the androgen receptor, as well as the estrogen receptor [37], was a nuclear protein. In the rat prostate and epididymis, castration caused to decline a staining intensity of immunoreactable androgen receptor in cell nuclei of the epithelial cells within 7 days [24]. In the present study, however, castration induced no changes in androgen receptor-immunoreactivity in cell nuclei of both epithelial and stromal cells of epididymis for at least 7 days after operation (Fig. 1a, b), suggesting that a withdrawal pattern of immunoreactive androgen receptor by castration might be species specific.

The present study also demonstrated that in the submandibular gland, the most frequent appearance of nuclear androgen receptor-immunoreactivity was observed in the acini (Fig. 3). Moreover, the cell nuclei in ID, GCT and SD also contained positive immunoreactivity in adult male and female mice (Figs. 2 and 3). These results were in agreement with that of autoradiographic study of tritiated androgen binding by Morrel et al. [21]. The present study further examined developmental profiles and sex difference in the proportion of androgen receptor-immunoreactive cells among the four regions of the gland. In acini and ID, the proportion of the androgen receptor-immunoreactive cells was at high levels during early postnatal period of 0–15 days of age, and then decreased with age (Fig. 3). In these early ages, the binding activity of androgen receptor in the mouse gland was, however, lower than that in the adult gland [20, 34], and DHT could not influence on the neonatal gland [10, 17]. Whereas the binding affinity of the androgen receptors was constant after 20 days of age [20, 32], it was higher in the gland within 7 days of age than in the gland after puberty [20]. Thus, characteristics of the androgen receptors in the neonatal mouse gland are different from those in the postpubertal gland. Therefore, although the immunoreactive androgen receptor molecules are rich in the neonatal gland, they may not fully exert their abilities due to functional immaturity.

The percentage of androgen receptor-immunoreactive acinar cells was higher in the male gland than in the female gland at 20 and 30 days, but became rather lower in the male than in the female at 90 days (Fig. 3). The acinar cells contain amylase activity, which is increased by androgen [9, 11]. Therefore, it suggests that the androgen-dependent amylase activity in acini may be sexually different: more in the male at 20 and 30 days of age, and more in the female at 90 days.

In male mice, circulating levels of androgens (testosterone and DHT) drastically increased between days 20 and 30 [30], and sexual difference in the mouse gland was evident on day 30 by increasing in the relative portion of GCT to total glandular area and cell height of GCT [28]. The cytosolic androgen receptor in the gland increases during postnatal development [20, 34] and its maximum binding (Bmax) is significantly higher in the male than in the female on days 20 and 30 [32]. In the present study, GCT contained androgen receptor-immunoreactivity in cell nuclei, and percentage of the immunoreactive cells was higher in the male than in the female on day 30 (Fig. 3). These results suggest that around 30 days of age, male GCT can respond timely to a drastic increase in circulating androgen level to cause their masculine development by an increase of androgen-reactive cell population. In addition, the mitosis occurred more easily by androgen in male GCT than in female GCT around this age [30], when Bmax of the cytosolic androgen receptor was higher in the male gland [32]. On the other hand, Bmax of the cytosolic androgen receptor in the adult mouse gland on day 90 was rather higher in the female than in the male [32], and androgen-induced DNA synthesis was inferior in the male gland to that in the female gland [22]. As described before [31], circulating androgens, testosterone and DHT, act in their intact forms to increase the mitotic activity of GCT in the mouse gland. The sex difference in androgen responsiveness of GCT was demonstrated by this androgen receptor-immunoreactivity study (Fig. 3) as well as by the previous biochemical androgen binding study [32]. These results suggest that the occurrence of sexual dimorphism of the mouse gland may be correlated to sex difference in both levels of androgen receptors in GCT cells and of circulating androgens around 20 to 30 days of age.

The present study demonstrated that both ID and SD cells in the mouse gland had androgen receptorimmunoreactivity in their cell nuclei and no sex difference in the androgen-reactive population during observation period (Fig. 3). Roles of androgens on these duct regions are not yet clear, because their relative portions to total glandular area and their mitotic activities are neither sexually different nor affected by androgens [2830].

REFERENCES

1.

T. Barka 1980. Biologically active polypeptides in submandibular glands. J Histochem Cytochem 28:836–859. Google Scholar

2.

R. L. Byyny, D. N. Orth, and S. Cohen . 1972. Radioimmunoassay of epidermal growth factor. Endocrinology 90:1261–1266. Google Scholar

3.

C. Chang, G. Chodak, E. Sarac, H. Terada, and S. Liao . 1989. Prostate androgen receptor: immunohistological localization and mRNA characterization. J Steroid Biochem 34:391–395. Google Scholar

4.

C. Chang, J. Kokontis, and S. Liao . 1988. Molecular cloning of human and rat complementary DNA encoding androgen receptors. Science 240:324–326. Google Scholar

5.

C. Chang, J. Kokontis, and S. Liao . 1988. Structural analysis of complementary DNA and amino acid sequences of human and rat androgen receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7211–7255. Google Scholar

6.

C. Chang, C. T. Whelan, T. C. Popovich, J. Kokontis, and S. Liao . 1989. Fusion proteins containing androgen receptor sequences and their use in the production of poly- and monoclonal antiandrogen receptor antibodies. Endocrinology 123:1097–1099. Google Scholar

7.

J. F. Dunn and J. D. Wilson . 1975. Developmental study of androgen responsiveness in the submandibular gland of the mouse. Endocrinology 96:1571–1578. Google Scholar

8.

E. W. Gresik 1980. Postnatal developmental changes in submandibular glands of rats and mice. J Histochem Cytochem 28:860–870. Google Scholar

9.

E. W. Gresik and T. Barka . 1980. Precocious development of granular convoluted tubules in the mouse submandibular gland induced by thyroxine or by thyroxine and testosterone. Am J Anat 159:177–185. Google Scholar

10.

E. W. Gresik and E. K. MacRae . 1975. The postnatal development of the sexually dimorphic duct system and of amylase activity in the submandibular glands of mice. Cell Tissue Res 157:411–422. Google Scholar

11.

E. W. Gresik, I. Schenkein, H. van der Noen, and T. Barka . 1981. Hormonal regulation of epidermal growth factor and protease in the submandibular gland of the adult mouse. Endocrinology 109:924–929. Google Scholar

12.

I. A. Hendry 1972. Developmental changes in tissue and plasma concentrations of the biologically active species of nerve growth factor in the mouse, by using a two-site radioimmunoassay. Biochem J 128:1265–1272. Google Scholar

13.

D. A. Husmann and M. J. McPhaul . 1991. Localization of the androgen receptor in the developing rat gubernaculum. Endocrinology 128:383–387. Google Scholar

14.

N. R. Jayasinghe, G. H. Cope, and S. Jacob . 1990. Morphometric studies on the development and sexual dimorphism of the submandibular gland of the mouse. J Anat 172:115–127. Google Scholar

15.

S. Kasayama, M. Yoshimura, and T. Oka . 1989. The regulation by thyroid hormones and androgen of epidermal growth factor synthesis in the submandibular gland and its plasma concentrations in mice. J Endocrinol 121:269–275. Google Scholar

16.

M. Kumegawa, T. Takuma, and Y. Takagi . 1977. Precocious induction of secretory granules by hormones in convoluted tubules of mouse submandibular glands. Am J Anat 149:111–114. Google Scholar

17.

S. Kyakumoto, R. Kurokawa, T. Ohara-Nemoto, and M. Ota . 1986. Sex difference in the cytosolic and nuclear distribution of androgen receptor in mouse submandibular gland. J Endocrinol 108:267–273. Google Scholar

18.

A. M. Michelakis, H. Yoshida, J. Menzie, K. Murakami, and T. Inagami . 1974. A radioimmunoassay for the direct measurement of renin in mice and its application to submaxillary gland and kidney studies. Endocrinology 94:1101–1105. Google Scholar

19.

C. A. S. A. Minetti, L. B. S. Valle, F. Fave-De-Moraes, J. H. Romaldini, and R. M. Oliveira-Filho . 1986. Ontogenesis of androgen receptors in the mouse submandibular gland: correlation with the developmental profiles of circulating thyroid and testicular hormones. Acta Endocrinol 112:290–295. Google Scholar

20.

J. I. Morrell, E. W. Gresik, and T. Barka . 1987. Autoradiographic localization of dihydrotestosterone binding in the major salivary glands and other androgen-responsive organs of the mouse. J Histochem Cytochem 35:249–257. Google Scholar

21.

M. Oda, R. Yamamoto, N. Terada, Y. Nishizawa, D. Takatsuka, Y. Kitamura, and K. Matsumoto . 1992. Maintenance by androgen and thyroid hormone of androgen-induced convoluted tubular cells in mouse submandibular glands. Anat Rec 232:453–457. Google Scholar

22.

C. A. Pinkstaff 1980. The cytology of salivary glands. Int Rev Cytol 63:141–261. Google Scholar

23.

G. S. Prins and L. Birch . 1993. Immunocytochemical analysis of androgen receptor along the ducts of the separate rat prostate lobes after androgen withdrawal and replacement. Endocrinology 132:169–178. Google Scholar

24.

G. S. Prins, L. Birch, and G. L. Greene . 1991. Androgen receptor localization in different cell types of the adult rat prostate. Endocrinology 129:3187–3199. Google Scholar

25.

M. L. Roberts 1974. Testosterone-induced accumulation of epidermal growth factor in the submandibular salivary glands of mice assessed by radioimmunoassay. Biochem Pharmacol 23:3305–3308. Google Scholar

26.

M. Sar, D. B. Lubahn, F. S. French, and E. M. Wilson . 1990. Immunohistochemical localization of the androgen receptor in rat and human tissues. Endocrinology 127:3180–3186. Google Scholar

27.

K. Sawada and T. Noumura . 1991. Effects of castration and sex steroids on sexually dimorphic development of the mouse submandibular gland. Acta Anat 140:97–103. Google Scholar

28.

K. Sawada and T. Noumura . 1992. Sexually dimorphic duct system of the submandibular gland in mouse with testicular feminization mutation (Tfm/Y). Acta Anat 143:241–245. Google Scholar

29.

K. Sawada and T. Noumura . 1992. Differential effects of testosterone and 5α-dihydrotestosterone on growth in mouse submandibular gland. Zool Sci 9:803–809. Google Scholar

30.

K. Sawada and T. Noumura . 1993. Metabolism of androgens by the mouse submandibular gland and effects of their metabolites. Zool Sci 10:481–488. Google Scholar

31.

K. Sawada and T. Noumura . 1994. Characterization of androgen receptors for testosterone and 5α-dihydrotestosterone in the mouse submandibular gland. Zool Sci 11:563–569. Google Scholar

32.

H. Takeda, G. Chodak, S. Mutchnik, T. Nakamoto, and C. Chang . 1990. Immunohistochemical localization of androgen receptors with mono- and polyclonal antibodies to androgen receptor. J Endocrinol 126:17–25. Google Scholar

33.

T. Takuma, T. Nakamura, K. Hosoi, and M. Kumegawa . 1977. Binding protein for 5α-dihydrotestosterone in mouse submandibular gland. Biochem Biophys Acta 496:175–181. Google Scholar

34.

J. Tan, D. R. Joseph, V. E. Quarmby, D. B. Jubahn, M. Sar, F. S. French, and E. M. Wilson . 1988. The rat androgen receptor: primary structure, autoregulation of its androgen messenger ribonucleic acid and immunocytochemical localization of the receptor protein. Mol Endocrinol 2:1276–1285. Google Scholar

35.

P. Walker, M. E. Weichsel Jr, S. B. Hoath, R. E. Poland, and D. A. Fisher . 1981. Effect of thyroxine, testosterone, and corticosterone on nerve growth factor (NGF) and epidermal growht factor (EGF) concentrations in adult female mouse submaxillary gland: dissociation of NGF and EGF responses. Endocrinology 109:582–587. Google Scholar

36.

S. Yamashita and K. A. Korach . 1987. Immunological analysis of biochemical properties of the estrogen receptor. J Cell Biol 105:129–138. Google Scholar
Kazuhiko Sawada and Tetsuo Noumura "Developmental Pattern of Androgen Receptor Immunoreactivity in the Mouse Submandibular Gland," Zoological Science 12(2), 243-248, (1 April 1995). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.12.243
Received: 4 April 1994; Accepted: 1 February 1995; Published: 1 April 1995
Back to Top