BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
10 August 2018 Dynamics of gaps created by burning in Florida oak–saw palmetto (Quercus, Fagaceae–Serenoa repens, Arecaceae) scrub1,2
Paul A. Schmalzer, Tammy E. Foster
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Sandy gaps in the shrub matrix of oak (Quercus L.)–saw palmetto (Serenoa repens (W. Bartram) Small) scrub are created by fire but typically close quickly because of rapid regrowth. Such gaps are important habitat features for rare scrub flora and fauna and appear to have been more common in the historical landscape. We followed, from 1993 to 2016, the dynamics of 12 gaps (32.2–98.1 m2) created by burning slash piles as part of restoration of long-unburned scrub. Gaps closed slowly, primarily by canopy spread of oaks around the gaps. In the absence of subsequent fire, gaps closed within approximately 12 yr. When burned a second or third time, gap area increased to near the initial after-burn size but then declined in area more rapidly than after the initial fire. Vegetation that reestablished in gaps differed from that of the scrub matrix in having less cover of scrub oaks, less cover of S. repens > 0.5 m, greater cover of native shrubs and forbs > 0.5 m, and more bare ground. Soil heating from slash-pile burning killed the roots and rhizomes from which scrub oaks, Serenoa, and ericaceous shrubs sprout; this altered and slowed the after-fire recovery.

Natural disturbance, such as fires, windstorms, and floods, affects vegetation structure and composition at multiple spatial and temporal scales (White 1979, Pickett and White 1985, Mitchell 2013). Disturbance regimes are integral to the survival of many species and the maintenance of diversity (Gardner and Engelhardt 2008). Gaps—openings in a forest canopy where one tree died and recruitment of new individuals occurs (Watt 1947)—are disturbances that are small, relative to the vegetation matrix. Canopy gaps influence regeneration and species diversity in temperate, tropical, and boreal forests (Brokaw 1985, Runkle 1985, Platt and Strong 1989, Denslow and Spies 1990, Spies et al. 1990, Yamamoto 1992, Brokaw and Busing 2000, McCarthy 2001, Martins and Rodrigues 2002, Rantis and Johnson 2002, Kwit and Platt 2003); they are recognized as important in forest systems worldwide (Muscolo et al. 2014, Zhu et al. 2014, Buettel et al. 2017). Gaps contribute to greater herbaceous diversity in forested wetlands (Anderson and Leopold 2002) and herbaceous-layer composition and diversity in tropical forests (Dirzo et al. 1992). Gap formation may be the primary disturbance (Runkle 1998) or may interact with more-widespread disturbances, such as typhoons (Yao et al. 2015), ice storms (Nagel et al. 2017), or fire (Cannon et al. 2017). Fire is an important disturbance in vegetation worldwide (Bond and van Wilgen 1996, Bond and Keeley 2005).

Gaps in the prevailing vegetation matrix also influence vegetation in nonforested systems, including shrublands (Dickinson et al. 1993), woodlands (Pecot et al. 2007), and grasslands (Tozer et al. 2008, Franzese et al. 2009). Crawford and Young (1998) found species richness to be greater in gaps than it was in a shrub thicket. Mounds created by badgers in a prairie supported fugitive plants (Platt and Weis 1977). Patches of bare ground influenced herb and shrub establishment in subalpine heathland and grassland (Williams 1992). Oak survival and growth in an oak savanna–dry forest matrix was influenced by the interaction between gaps and fire (Rebertus and Burns 1997), and pine growth increased in gaps in a pine savanna (McGuire et al. 2001). In California chaparral, Keeley et al. (2016) found obligate-seeding species favored by large gaps.

Disturbance of belowground biomass can lead to the formation of aboveground gaps. In an old field, Cahill and Casper (2002) found that canopy gaps corresponded to gaps in belowground biomass. Persistent openings in New Jersey pinelands formed where disturbance, probably fire, removed the organic horizon and the dense roots and rhizomes contained in it (Ehrenfeld et al. 1995).

Florida Scrub. Florida scrub is a shrub community on well-drained, infertile, sandy soils, in which scrub oaks (Quercus geminata Small, Quercus myrtifolia Willd., Quercus chapmanii Sarg., Quercus inopina Ashe), Florida rosemary (Ceratiola ericoides Michx.), repent palms (Serenoa repens (W. Bartram) Small, Sabal etonia Swingle ex Nash), and ericaceous shrubs predominate (Myers 1990). Florida scrub is known for the number of rare, endemic plants it contains (Christman and Judd 1990, Menges 1999, Stout 2001), and it is habitat for a number of rare, threatened, or endangered fauna (Myers 1990, Menges 1999).

Florida scrub is characterized by periodic, intense fire (Abrahamson and Hartnett 1990, Myers 1990). Fire is an important disturbance in scrub; vegetation composition in scrub is influenced by fire, depth to water table, and soils (Myers 1990, Menges 1999). Fire behavior and effects are heterogeneous at the landscape scale (Turner et al. 1994, 2003) within stands of vegetation (Odion and Davis 2000) and at fine spatial scales of ≤ 1 m (Thaxton and Platt 2006, O'Brien et al. 2016). Variation in fuels contributes to heterogeneity in fire behavior and effects (Mitchell et al. 2009).

Gaps—open, sandy areas—are critical microhabitat features for many of the rare scrub plants (Menges and Hawkes 1998, Menges 1999, Menges et al. 2008) and scrub fauna (Greenberg et al. 1994, Hokit et al. 1999, Carrel 2003, Breininger et al. 2014). The microclimate of those gaps may differ from the surrounding scrub matrix; for example, Weekley et al. (2007) found soil moisture to be greater in gaps than it was in the scrub matrix in several scrub types.

Gaps in Florida rosemary scrub may persist for long periods after fire (Hawkes and Menges 1996, Menges et al. 2008). Ceratiola ericoides is killed by fire, reestablishes by seed, and grows more slowly than sprouting scrub oaks (Johnson 1982, Menges et al. 2008). In addition, Ceratiola sp. produces allelochemicals that depress germination of co-occurring plant species (Hunter and Menges 2002, Hewitt and Menges 2008). In contrast, gaps in oak–saw palmetto scrub or scrubby flatwoods, close more rapidly after fire, where postfire regeneration is primarily by sprouting of clonal species (Abrahamson 1984a, b; Schmalzer and Hinkle 1992; Young and Menges 1999; Schmalzer 2003; Dee and Menges 2014). However, gaps in scrubby flatwoods are important for regeneration and persistence of some species (Young and Menges 1999, Dee and Menges 2014).

At the landscape scale, gaps in Florida scrub were historically more abundant before landscape fragmentation and fire suppression; prescribed fire management has restored gaps in some sites but not others (Duncan et al. 1999).

Here, we examined the dynamics of aboveground gaps in oak–saw palmetto scrub that were established by burning of piles during restoration of long-unburned scrub to restore habitat for the threatened Florida scrub-jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens; Schmalzer et al. 1994, Breininger et al. 2014). Our objectives were (a) to determine the persistence of these created gaps, (b) to identify the vegetation composition within the gaps, and (c) to compare the vegetation composition in the gaps to vegetation in the surrounding scrub matrix. We followed the extent and vegetation composition of a set of 12 of these gaps through an unburned recovery period of 10 yr. We also observed how gaps changed after second and third fires up until 2016. Because gaps are a critical habitat feature for many scrub species, it is important to understand how gaps created by management practices change over time.

Materials and Methods. This study was conducted in the northern section of the Kennedy Space Center/Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (KSC/MINWR) in the Shiloh area (28°38′N, 80°42′W). Two adjacent stands of long-unburned oak–saw palmetto scrub, separated by a sand road, were selected for restoration as part of the scrub-habitat compensation plan for KSC/MINWR (Schmalzer et al. 1994). The northern stand was about 12.1 ha, and the southern stand was 9.1 ha.

Before mechanical treatment, 20 line-intercept transects (15 m long; Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg 1974) were established and sampled in the scrub matrix in 1992; 10 transects were north and 10 south of the sand road. Cover was measured to the nearest 5 cm by species in two height strata, > 0.5 m and < 0.5 m. Vegetation transects in the scrub matrix were sampled from 1994 through 2016 (Table 1).

Table 1. 

History of the Shiloh scrub restoration site.

i1095-5674-145-3-250-t01.tif

The scrub matrix was dominated by scrub oaks (Q. geminata, Q. myrtifolia, and Q. chapmanii), Serenoa repens, and ericaceous shrubs, before treatment (Schmalzer et al. 1994). Initial vegetation height was 4.2 m north and 3.8 m south of the sand road. Soils were mapped as Paola fine sand, a Spodic Quartzipsamments (Huckle et al. 1974). The vegetation height and structure were indicative of scrub long unburned because of a combination of landscape fragmentation and fire suppression (Schmalzer et al. 1994). Subsequent dating of basal sections of Q. myrtifolia cut during sampling in 1992, before treatment, gave an age range of 22–53 yr north and 13–33 yr south of the sand road.

Because of the large stature of the scrub oaks at this site, a D6 tractor (Caterpillar, Peoria, IL) with a V-blade was used to cut the trees between January and March 1993. The resulting fuel bed had a high percentage of heavy fuels consisting of oak stems with basal diameters of 12–20 cm. These were left scattered to dry, then some of the heavy fuels were piled to enhance complete burning. Prescribed burns were conducted in early November 1993. The prescribed burn of the northern section was less complete (60–70%, November 1, 1993) than the southern section (95%, November 3, 1993), but the slash piles burned completely in both fires (Schmalzer et al. 1994).

The areas in which the slash piles burned completely left behind aboveground gaps in the scrub-vegetation matrix. The dimensions of 12 gaps were delineated after the fire, 8 in the northern section and 4 in the southern section. We sampled the gaps annually from 1995 to 2016. Gaps were approximately elliptical in shape, and area was estimated based on the lengths of the major and minor axes (Runkle 1992, Schliemann and Bockheim 2011). At each sampling, we determined the length of each axis that remained open (defined as not covered by continuous woody vegetation). The major axis of each gap was used as a line-intercept transect (Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg 1974), and vegetation cover was determined by species each year in two height strata, > 0.5 m and < 0.5 m.

The northern section of the site burned again in May 2004 (Table 1) when seven gaps burned. One gap in the southern section of the site was disturbed by roller-chopping but not burned and was dropped from further sampling. Prescribed fires in 2008 and 2013 burned some gaps (Table 1). Some scrub-matrix transects were burned in 2004, 2005, 2008, or 2013 (Table 1).

Native and introduced species of similar life forms were classified into six plant groups (Table 2) to follow dynamics of vegetation change over time and to compare the vegetation composition of the gaps to the scrub matrix. That grouping was necessary because of the large number of individual species. Taxonomic nomenclature follows Wunderlin and Hansen (2011). We used linear models to determine how gaps and time-since-fire affected the percentage of cover for plant groups in both strata (> 0.5 m and < 0.5 m) and how gaps, time-since-fire, and strata affected total cover using R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Because of the large number of zeros in the data set, the residuals of the models were not normal; the model point estimates should still be unbiased, but the variance may be underestimated. We used linear regression to examine changes in opening area over time (SPSS Statistics, version 24; IBM, Armonk, NY).

Table 2. 

Plant groups in the Shiloh scrub matrix and gaps.

i1095-5674-145-3-250-t02.tif

Results

.

Responses After First Burn. The initial area of gaps ranged from 32.2 to 98.1 m2, with a mean of 55.6 m2. The area remaining open declined to a mean of 14.9 m2 by June 2003, which was 116 mo after the burn (Fig. 1). For gaps that did not burn a second time, the area that remained open declined to < 3 m2 by 140 mo after the fire (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. 

Change in area of scrub gaps after creation by burn piles. Area of scrub gaps (N = 12) from 1993 to 2003 (116 mo after the burn). Area remaining open declined as Area = 53.209–0.337 (time), r = −0.626, P < 0.001. Seven of these gaps burned in 2004. Area of four scrub gaps from 1993 to 2007 (163 mo after the burn). Area remaining open declined as Area = 47.782–0.304 (time), r = −0.70, P < 0.001. These gaps did not burn in 2004. Error bars indicate 1 SE.

i1095-5674-145-3-250-f01.tif

Within gaps, total cover > 0.5 m increased from 1995 (20 mo after the burn) to 2003 (116 mo after the burn; Fig. 2A; Table 3). Cover of scrub oaks, Serenoa, woody vines, and native shrubs > 0.5 m increased through that period (Table 4, S1). Cover of native forbs > 0.5 m increased after burning but then declined by the end of the period (Table 4, S1). Total cover < 0.5 m within gaps increased after burning and then declined (Fig. 2B; Table 3), as did native forbs and scrub oaks < 0.5 m (Table 5, S2). Bare ground within gaps declined from 1995 to 2003 (Fig. 2C; Table 5).

Fig. 2. 

Comparison of total cover and bare ground in gaps and scrub matrix through 10 yr after the burn. (A) Total cover > 0.5 m in gaps (N = 12) created by burning and in the scrub matrix (N = 20) from 1993 to 2003. Error bars indicate 1 SE. After the burn, cover differed between gaps and matrix. (B) Total cover < 0.5 m in gaps (N = 12) and in the scrub matrix (N = 20) created by burning from 1993 to 2003. After the burn, cover differed between gaps and matrix. (C) Bare ground in gaps (N = 12) and in the scrub matrix (N = 20) created by burning from 1993 to 2003. After the burn, cover differed between gaps and matrix.

i1095-5674-145-3-250-f02.tif

Table 3. 

Estimates and standard errors for the general linear model showing effects of gaps, time since fire, and strata (< 0.5 m and > 0.5 m) on total vegetation cover; > 0.5 m was the base strata. Adjusted R2 was 0.6327; P < 0.001. TSF = time since fire. Regression models for each strata are provided in the last rows of the table.

i1095-5674-145-3-250-t03.tif

Table 4. 

Estimates and standard errors for the general linear model showing effects of gaps, time since fire, and plant group cover in the > 0.5 m strata. Native Forb is the base plant group. Adjusted R2 was 0.6491; P < 0.001. Plant groups follow Table 2. TSF = time since fire. Regression models for each plant group are provided in the last rows of the table.

i1095-5674-145-3-250-t04.tif

Table 5. 

Estimates and standard errors for the general linear model showing effects of gaps, time since fire, and plant group cover in the < 0.5 m strata. Bare ground is the base plant group. Adjusted R2 was 0.5276, P < 0.001. Plant groups follow Table 2. TSF = time since fire. Regression models for each plant group are provided in the last rows of the table.

i1095-5674-145-3-250-t05.tif

In the scrub matrix, total cover > 0.5 m decreased immediately after the burn and then increased (Fig. 2A; Table 3) as did cover > 0.5 m of scrub oaks and Serenoa species (Table 4, S5). Woody vines and native shrubs > 0.5 m (Table 4, S5) increased from preburn values after the burn. Native forbs > 0.5 m increased after the burn and then decreased to low values (Table 4, S5). Total cover < 0.5 m in the scrub matrix (Fig. 2B, Table 3) increased after the burn and then declined, as did the cover of scrub oaks and native forbs < 0.5 m (Table 5, S6). Bare ground increased after the burn and then declined (Fig. 2C; Table 5). Native grasses had low cover values > 0.5 m and < 0.5 m in the scrub matrix and gaps (Table 4, 5, S1, S2, S5, S6).

Cover of plant groups differed in the gaps, compared with the scrub matrix, with the exceptions of woody vines > 0.5 m and native shrubs < 0.5 m (Table 4, 5). Gaps had less total cover > 0.5 m (Fig. 2A; Table 3) and less cover of scrub oaks and saw palmetto > 0.5 m. (Table 4, S1, S5). Gaps had greater total cover < 0.5 m than the scrub matrix had (Fig. 2B; Table 3) and greater cover of native forbs < 0.5 m (Table 5, S2, S6) but less cover of scrub oaks < 0.5 m (Table 5, S2, S6). Gaps retained greater bare ground than the scrub matrix (Fig. 2C; Table 5).

No rare or gap-specialist plants established in the gaps (Table S3, S4). Invasive, exotic plants also did not establish and persist in the gaps, with only transitory occurrences of Melinis repens (Willd.) Zizka and Lantana camara L. (Table S3, S4). Specifically, Melinis occurred twice at 20 and 32 mo after the burn at 0.2–0.3% mean cover (Table S3, S4). Lantana occurred once at 68 mo after the burn at 0.2% cover (Table S3). In the scrub matrix, Melinis occurred at 0.2% or less mean cover at 7, 24, and 30 mo after the burn, but not subsequently, whereas Lantana did not occur (P.A.S. and T.E.F., unpublished data).

Responses After Subsequent Burns. Seven gaps burned for a second time in May 2004 (Table 1). Gap area increased immediately after the burn to close to the initial size (Fig. 3A). However, gap area declined more rapidly after the second burn than after the original treatment (Fig. 3A). Four gaps burned again in both 2004 and 2008 (Table 1). After both subsequent burns, gap area increased to close to the original size (Fig. 3B). Gap area declined more rapidly after the second and third burns than after the initial treatment, with expected closure at about 5 yr after the burn (Fig 3B). Responses after the second and third burns were similar (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3. 

Changes in area of gaps burned a second and third time. (A) Area of seven gaps created in 1993 and burned again in 2004. Error bars indicate 1 SE. After the first burn, gap area declined as Area = 50.624–0.311 (time), r = −0.678, P < 0.001; after the second burn gap area declined as Area = 37.919–0.699 (time), r = −0.565, P = 0.002. (B) Area of four gaps created in 1993 and burned in 2004 and 2008. After the first burn, gap area declined as Area = 48.330–0.348 (time), r = −0.752, P < 0.001; after the second burn, gap area declined as Area = 41.101–0.828 (time), r = −0.752, P = 0.001; after the third burn, gap area declined as Area = 38.805–0.734 (time), r = −0.686, P = 0.001.

i1095-5674-145-3-250-f03.tif

Discussion. Burning piled fuels produced gaps in the scrub matrix that persisted for > 10 yr. Increased and longer-duration soil heating appeared to kill the roots and rhizomes of scrub oaks, ericads, and Serenoa that resprout under typical fire conditions. These gaps retained greater cover of bare ground and forbs but less cover of scrub oaks and Serenoa compared with the scrub matrix. After second and third burns, gap areas initially expanded but closed more rapidly than after the original treatment. This suggests that relatively frequent fire might maintain more gap area. It is also possible that if the second burn had occurred earlier than 10 yr after the original treatment, more of the gap area would have remained open. In rosemary scrub, the gap area declined for 10 yr after the burn but then plateaued in the absence of a second fire (Menges et al. 2017). In our study, gap area continued to decline. However, when partially closed gaps burned, the open areas increased in our study, as it did in the rosemary scrub (Menges et al. 2017).

Scrub fires are intense stand-replacing fires that typically kill aboveground stems of oaks, ericads, and Pinus clausa (Chapm. ex Engelm.) Vasey ex Sarg. (Myers 1990). The pulse of heat from those fires may exceed 700 °C (Wally et al. 2006) but is of short duration. The rapid movement of the flame front and the insulating properties of soil limits heating of the soil (DeBano et al. 2005), such that temperatures are not lethal to roots and rhizomes in the soil (Whelan 1995, Busse and DeBano 2005). Alexis et al. (2007) found that soil temperatures at 2–3 cm depth remained < 100 °C, litter surface temperatures ranged from 371 to 760 °C, and temperature in the vegetation ranged from 260 to 816 °C in the 2004 prescribed burn of this site.

Scrub oaks have extensive belowground roots and rhizomes (Guerin 1993, Day et al. 2013), as do ericads. Belowground biomass of scrub at KSC/MINWR makes up approximately 85% of total biomass (Stover et al. 2007). Under normal fire conditions, the belowground roots and rhizomes survive, and after fire, carbon stored belowground is used for sprouting (Stover et al. 2007). Sprouting is rapid and scrub vegetation reestablishes cover quickly (Abrahamson 1984a, 1984b, Schmalzer and Hinkle 1992, Schmalzer 2003). Fine roots also recover rapidly after fire (Day et al. 2013). Oak cover returns to preburn values usually within 5 yr (Schmalzer 2003). The aboveground buds of Serenoa are well-protected, resulting in little fire-related morality (Abrahamson and Abrahamson 2002). Saw palmetto leaves regenerate rapidly after fire (Abrahamson and Abrahamson 2006), and cover returns to preburn levels usually within 1 yr.

Hence, prescribed burns do not generally lead to the creation of persistent gaps in oak–saw palmetto scrub because of the lack of soil heating. Where logging has produced greater fuels on the ground, residence times of elevated temperatures are longer (Wally et al. 2006). Adding fuel elevated the soil temperatures significantly in prescribed burns in flatwoods but did not change shrub regeneration (Hierro and Menges 2002). In maritime chaparral fires, variation in fuel distribution caused spatial variation in surface heating that affected both seed and sprout regeneration (Odion and Davis 2000). Prolonged heating from burning slash piles or masticated fuels can cause soil heating to depths lethal to soil organisms, plant roots and rhizomes, and seeds (Whelan 1995, Korb et al. 2004, Busse et al. 2005, DeBano et al. 2005). Our data indicate that burning of piled oak stems killed most or all of the roots and rhizomes of oaks, ericads, and Serenoa within the pile area, resulting in gaps that persisted for > 10 yr. This differed from the scrub matrix where the percentage bare ground decreased rapidly postfire.

Closure of the gaps that formed was slow, with much of the cover of scrub oaks developing from branches arching over the gap as oaks rooted outside the gap grew in height; this is reflected in the scrub oak cover increasing in > 0.5 m oaks, without first increasing in < 0.5 m scrub oaks, in contrast to the scrub matrix. When subsequent fires top-killed oaks surrounding the gaps, gap area increased. Some clonal spread of oaks, and perhaps Serenoa, into gaps was occurring; seedling establishment of oaks and Serenoa can occur but appears infrequently in the study area. Recovery of belowground biomass is slow compared with the rapid recovery of aboveground biomass by sprouting when the roots and rhizomes remain intact. Other systems that typically recover from disturbance by sprouting show much slower or altered recovery when belowground roots and rhizomes are killed (e.g., Matlack et al. 1993, Ehrenfeld et al.1995).

The more-open conditions in the gaps favored herbaceous species. Galactia elliottii Nutt. The most abundant herbaceous species in the gaps, also occurs in the surrounding scrub matrix. Whether it established from seed in the soil or dispersed from the adjacent matrix is not known. Invasive, exotic species did not establish persisting populations in the gaps, although old fields with populations of exotic grasses (Schmalzer et al. 2002) occurred within < 100 m of some of the gaps.

Gaps in scrub are important for rare scrub plants (Menges and Hawkes 1998, Menges 1999, Menges et al. 2008, 2017), but none established in these created gaps. The long period of fire exclusion before restoration began in 1993 probably contributed to the lack of any gap-dependent rare plants in the surrounding scrub matrix. Scrub on KSC/MINWR has fewer rare scrub plants than that of the Lake Wales Ridge (Schmalzer et al. 1999), but some gap-dependent scrub plants do occur. Known populations of gap-dependent species, such as Lechea divaricata Shuttlw. ex Britton occur approximately 5 km from the study site (Schmalzer and Foster 2016), limiting potential dispersal.

Recovery after burning of slash piles in a restoration project differs from recovery after typical scrub fires, confirming the suggestion of Hierro and Menges (2002) that only very intense fires would alter postfire responses. Are there natural analogs that could produce similar results? Hurricanes or other severe windstorms could produce additional, concentrated fuels that could subsequently burn (Myers and van Lear 1998). Wind and fire may have amplified effects under some circumstances (Cannon et al. 2017). Liu et al. (2008) presented paleoecological data suggesting that intense hurricanes reduced populations of pines and were followed by intense fires.

The shrub layer of scrub vegetation is relatively resistant to hurricane winds with short-term defoliation and reduction in photosynthesis (Li et al. 2007) but little to no damage to rare scrub plants (Menges et al. 2011). Of the pines that occur associated with scrub vegetation, Pinus clausa is the most vulnerable to hurricane damage that produces debris (Myers 1990, Parker et al. 2001, Drewa et al. 2008, Menges et al. 2011). Pinus elliottii Engelm. var. densa Little & K.W. Dorman is relatively resistant to hurricane winds (Platt et al. 2000), but some damage and mortality does occur. Pinus palustris Mill. is also relatively resistant (Provencher et al. 2001) but can suffer damage (Kleinman and Hart 2017). We have observed gaps of varying sizes around burned pine stumps, branches, or boles in scrubby flatwoods. Scattered P. elliottii var. densa occurred in the study site but did not occur on the transects.

There is some potential for hurricanes or similar winds to produce concentrated fuels that, when burned, form gaps. Subsequent, normal fires, if frequent enough, could maintain at least parts of those gaps by limiting the height and canopy spread of shrubs that would close gaps from the sides because the reestablishment by seed or clonal spread into gaps is slow compared with sprouting from underground rhizomes. This may represent one mechanism by which gaps can form in oak–saw palmetto scrub and scrubby flatwoods that persist for more than a few years after a fire.

Literature Cited

1.

Abrahamson, W. G. 1984a. Post-fire recovery of Florida Lake Wales Ridge vegetation. Am. J. Bot. 71: 9–21. Google Scholar

2.

Abrahamson, W. G. 1984b. Species responses to fire on the Florida Lake Wales Ridge. Am. J. Bot. 71: 35–43. Google Scholar

3.

Abrahamson, W. G. and C. R. Abrahamson. 2002. Persistent palmettos: Effects of the 2000–2001 drought on Serenoa repens and Sabal etonia. Fla. Sci. 65: 281–292. Google Scholar

4.

Abrahamson, W. G. and C. R. Abrahamson. 2006. Post-fire canopy recovery in two fire-adapted palms, Serenoa repens and Sabal etonia (Arecaceae). Fla. Sci. 69: 69–79. Google Scholar

5.

Abrahamson, W. G. and D. C. Hartnett. 1990. Pine flatwoods and dry prairies, pp. 103–149. In R. L. Myersand J. J. Ewel[eds.]. Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, FL. Google Scholar

6.

Alexis, M. A., D. P. Rassse, C. Rumpel, G. Bardoux, N. Pechot, P. Schmalzer, B. Drake, and A. Mariotti. 2007. Fire impact on C and N losses and charcoal production in a scrub oak ecosystem. Biogeochemistry 82: 201–216. Google Scholar

7.

Anderson, K. L. and D. J. Leopold. 2002. The role of canopy gaps in maintaining vascular plant diversity at a forested wetland in New York State. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 129: 238–250. Google Scholar

8.

Bond, W. J. and J. E. Keeley. 2005. Fire as a global ‘herbivore': The ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 387–394. Google Scholar

9.

Bond, W. J. and B. W. van Wilgen. 1996. Fire and Plants. Chapman & Hall. New York, NY. Google Scholar

10.

Breininger, D. R., E. D. Stolen, G. M. Carter, D. M. Oddy, and S. A. Legare. 2014. Quantifying how territory quality and sociobiology affect recruitment to inform fire management. Anim. Conserv. 17: 72–79. Google Scholar

11.

Brokaw, N. V. 1985. Treefalls, regrowth, and community structure in tropical forests, pp. 53–69. In S. T. A. Pickettand P. S. White[eds.]. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York, NY. Google Scholar

12.

Brokaw, N. and R. T. Busing. 2000. Niche versus chance and tree diversity in forest gaps. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 183–188. Google Scholar

13.

Buettel, J. C., S. Ondei, and B. W. Brook. 2017. Looking down to see what's up: A systematic overview of treefall dynamics in forests. Forests 8: 123.  10.3390/f8040123Google Scholar

14.

Busse, M. D. and L. F. DeBano. 2005. Soil biology, pp. 73–91. In D. G Neary, K. C. Ryan, and L. F. DeBano[eds.]. Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Soil and Water. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42-volume 4. Google Scholar

15.

Busse, M. D., K. R. Hubbert, G. O. Fiddler, C. J. Shestak, and R. F. Powers. 2005. Lethal soil temperatures during burning of masticated forest residues. Int. J. Wildland Fire 14: 267–276. Google Scholar

16.

Cahill, J. F., Jr. and B. B. Casper. 2002. Canopy gaps are sites of reduced belowground competition in a productive old field. Plant Ecol. 164: 29–36. Google Scholar

17.

Cannon, J. B., C. J. Peterson, J. J. O'Brien, and J. S. Brewer. 2017. A review and classification of interactions between forest disturbance from wind and fire. For. Ecol. Manag. 406: 381–390. Google Scholar

18.

Carrel, J. E. 2003. Burrowing wolf spiders, Geolycosa spp. (Araneae: Lycosidae): Gap specialists in fire-maintained Florida scrub. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 76: 557–566. Google Scholar

19.

Christman, S. P. and W. S. Judd. 1990. Notes on plants endemic to Florida scrub. Fla. Sci. 53: 52–73. Google Scholar

20.

Crawford, E. R. and D. R. Young. 1998. Comparison of gaps and intact shrub thickets on an Atlantic Coast barrier island. Am. Midl. Nat. 140: 68–77. Google Scholar

21.

Day, F. P., R. E. Schroeder, D. B. Stover, A. L. P. Brown, J. R. Butnor, J. Dilustro, B. A. Hungate, P. Dijkstra, B. D. Duval, T. J. Seiler, B. G. Drake, and C. R. Hinkle. 2013. The effects of 11 yr of CO2 enrichment on roots in a Florida scrub-oak ecosystem. New Phytol. 200: 778–787. Google Scholar

22.

Debano, L. F., D. G. Neary, and P. F. Ffolliott. 2005. Chapter 2: Soil physical properties, pp. 29–51. In D. G. Neary, K. C. Ryan, and L. F. DeBano[eds.]. Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Soil and Water. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42-volume 4. Google Scholar

23.

Dee, J. R. and E. S. Menges. 2014. Gap ecology in the Florida scrubby flatwoods: Effects of time-since-fire, gap area, gap aggregation and microhabitat on gap species diversity. J. Veg. Sci. 25: 1235–1246. Google Scholar

24.

Denslow, J. S. and T. Spies. 1990. Canopy gaps in forest ecosystems: An introduction. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 619. Google Scholar

25.

Dickinson, M. B., F. E. Putz, and C. D. Canham. 1993. Canopy gap closure in thickets of the clonal shrub, Cornus racemosa. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 120: 439–444. Google Scholar

26.

Dirzo, R. C., C. Horvitz, H. Quevedo, and M. A. Lopez. 1992. The effects of gap size and age on the understorey herb community of a tropical Mexican rainforest. J. Ecol. 80: 809–822. Google Scholar

27.

Drewa, P. B., W. J. Platt, C. Kwit, and T. W. Doyle. 2008. Stand structure and dynamics of sand pine differ between the Florida panhandle and peninsula. Plant Ecol. 196: 15–25. Google Scholar

28.

Duncan, B. W., S. Boyle, D. R. Breininger, and P. A. Schmalzer. 1999. Coupling past management practice and historic landscape change on John F. Kennedy Space Center. Landsc. Ecol. 14: 291–309. Google Scholar

29.

Ehrenfeld, J. G., W. Zhu, and W. F. J. Parsons. 1995. Above- and below-ground characteristics of persistent forest openings in the New Jersey Pinelands. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 122: 298–305. Google Scholar

30.

Franzese, J., L. Ghermandi, and D. Bran. 2009. Post-fire recruitment in a semi-arid grassland: The role of microsites. J. Veg. Sci. 20: 251–259. Google Scholar

31.

Gardner, R. H. and K. A. M. Engelhardt. 2008. Spatial processes that maintain biodiversity in plant communities. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 9: 211–228. Google Scholar

32.

Greenberg, C. H., D. G. Neary, and L. D. Harris. 1994. Effects of high-intensity wildfire and silvicultural treatments on reptile communities in sand pine scrub. Conserv. Biol. 8: 1047–1057. Google Scholar

33.

Guerin, D. N. 1993. Oak dome clonal structure and fire ecology in a Florida longleaf pine dominated community. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 120: 107–114. Google Scholar

34.

Hawkes, C. V. and E. S. Menges. 1996. The relationship between open space and fire for species in a xeric Florida shrubland. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 123: 81–92. Google Scholar

35.

Hewitt, R. E. and E. S. Menges. 2008. Alleopathic effects of Ceratiola ericoides (Empetraceae) on germination and survival of six Florida scrub species. Plant Ecol. 198: 47–59. Google Scholar

36.

Hierro, J. L. and E. S. Menges. 2002. Fire intensity and shrub regeneration in palmetto-dominated flatwoods of central Florida. Fla. Sci. 65: 51–61. Google Scholar

37.

Hokit, D. G., B. M. Stith, and L. C. Branch. 1999. Effects of landscape structure in Florida scrub: A population perspective. Ecol. Appl. 9: 124–134. Google Scholar

38.

Huckle, H. F., H. D. Dollar, and R. F. Pendleton. 1974. Soil survey of Brevard County, Florida. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

39.

Hunter, M. E. and E. S. Menges. 2002. Allelopathic effects and root distribution of Ceratiola ericoides (Empetraceae) on seven rosemary scrub species. Am. J. Bot. 89: 1113–1118. Google Scholar

40.

Johnson, A. F. 1982. Some demographic characteristics of the Florida rosemary Ceratiola ericoides Michx. Am. Midl. Nat. 108: 170–174. Google Scholar

41.

Keeley, J. E., V. T. Parker, and M. C. Vasey. 2016. Resprouting and seeding hypotheses: A test of the gap-dependent model using resprouting and obligate seeding subspecies of Arctostaphylos. Plant Ecol. 217: 743–750. Google Scholar

42.

Kleinman, J. S. and J. L. Hart. 2017. Response by vertical strata to catastrophic wind in restored Pinus palustris stands. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 144: 423–438. Google Scholar

43.

Korb, J. E., N. C. Johnson, and W. W. Covington. 2004. Slash pile burning effects on soil biotic and chemical properties and plant establishment: Recommendations for amelioration. Restor. Ecol. 12: 52–62. Google Scholar

44.

Kwit, C. and W. J. Platt. 2003. Disturbance history influences regeneration of non-pioneer understory trees. Ecology 84: 2575–2581. Google Scholar

45.

Li, J. H., T. L. Powell, T. J. Seiler, D. P. Johnson, H. P. Anderson, R. Bracho, B. A. Hungate, C. R. Hinkle, and B. G. Drake. 2007. Impacts of Hurricane Frances on Florida scrub-oak ecosystem processes: Defoliation, net CO2 exchange and interactions with elevated CO2. Glob. Change Biol. 13: 1101–1113. Google Scholar

46.

Liu, K.-b., H. Lu, and C. Shen. 2008. A 1200-year proxy record of hurricanes and fires from the Gulf of Mexico coast: Testing the hypothesis of hurricane-fire interactions. Quat. Res. (Orlando) 69: 29–41. Google Scholar

47.

Martins, S. V. and R. R. Rodrigues. 2002. Gap-phase regeneration in a semideciduous mesophytic forest, south–eastern Brazil. Plant Ecol. 163: 51–62. Google Scholar

48.

Matlack, G. R., D. J. Gibson, and R. E. Good. 1993. Clonal propagation, local disturbance, and the structure of vegetation: Ericaceous shrubs in the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. Biol. Conserv. 63: 1–8. Google Scholar

49.

McCarthy, J. 2001. Gap dynamics of forest trees: A review with particular attention to boreal forests. Environ. Rev. 9: 1–59. Google Scholar

50.

McGuire, J. P., R. J. Mitchell, E. B. Moser, S. D. Pecot, D. H. Gjerstad, and C. W. Hedman. 2001. Gaps in a gappy forest: Plant resources, longleaf pine regeneration, and understory response to tree removal in longleaf pine savannas. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 765–778. Google Scholar

51.

Menges, E. S. 1999. Ecology and conservation of Florida scrub, pp. 7–22. In R. C. Anderson, J. S. Fralish, and J. M. Baskin[eds.]. Savannas, Barrens and Rock Outcrop Plant Communities of North America. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Google Scholar

52.

Menges, E. S. and C. V. Hawkes. 1998. Interactive effects of fire and microhabitat on plants of Florida scrub. Ecol. Appl. 8: 935–946. Google Scholar

53.

Menges, E. S., S. J. H. Crate, and P. F. Quintana-Ascencio. 2017. Dynamics of gaps, vegetation, and plant species with and without fire. Am. J. Bot. 104: 1825–1836. Google Scholar

54.

Menges, E. S., C. W. Weekley, G. L. Clarke, and S. A. Smith. 2011. Effects of hurricanes on rare plant demography in fire-controlled ecosystems. Biotropica 43: 450–458. Google Scholar

55.

Menges, E. S., A. Craddock, J. Salo, R. Zinthefer, and C. W. Weekley. 2008. Gap ecology in Florida scrub: Species occurrence, diversity, and gap properties. J. Veg. Sci. 19: 503–514. Google Scholar

56.

Mitchell, R. J., J. K. Hiers, J. O'Brien, and G. Starr. 2009. Ecological forestry in the Southeast: Understanding the ecology of fuels. J. Forestry 107: 391–397 Google Scholar

57.

Mitchell, S. J. 2013. Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: A synthesis. Forestry 86: 147–157. Google Scholar

58.

Mueller-Dombois, D. and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. Google Scholar

59.

Muscolo, A., S. Bagnatoand R. Mercurio. 2014. A review of the roles of forest canopy gaps. J. For. Res. 25: 725–746. Google Scholar

60.

Myers, R. K. and D. H. van Lear. 1998. Hurricane-fire interactions in coastal forest of the south: A review and hypothesis. For. Ecol. Manag. 103: 265–276. Google Scholar

61.

Myers, R. L. 1990. Scrub and high pine, pp. 150–193. In R. L. Myersand J. J. Ewell[eds.]. Ecosystems of Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, FL. Google Scholar

62.

Nagel, T. A., S. Mikac, M. Dolinar, M. Klopic, S. Keren, M. Svoboda, J. Diaci, A. Boncina, and V. Paulic. 2017. The natural disturbance regime in forests of the Dinaric Mountains: A synthesis of evidence. For. Ecol. Manag. 388: 29–42. Google Scholar

63.

O'Brien, J. J., E. L. Loudermilk, B. Hornsby, A. T. Hudak, B. C. Bright, M. B. Dickinson, J. K. Hiers, C. Teske, and R. D. Ottmar. 2016. High-resolution infrared thermography for capturing wildland fire behavior—RxCADRE 2012. Int. J. Wildland Fire 25: 62–75. Google Scholar

64.

Odion, D. C. and F. W. Davis. 2000. Fire, soil heating, and the formation of vegetation patterns in chaparral. Ecol. Monogr. 70: 149–169. Google Scholar

65.

Parker, A. J., K. C. Parker, and D. H. McCay. 2001. Disturbance-mediated variation in stand structure between varieties of Pinus clausa (sand pine). Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 91: 28–47. Google Scholar

66.

Pecot, S. D., R. J. Mitchell, B. J. Palik, E. B. Moser, and J. K. Hiers. 2007. Competitive responses of seedlings and understory plants in longleaf pine woodlands: Separating canopy influences above and below ground. Can. J. For. Res. 37: 634–648. Google Scholar

67.

Pickett, S. T. A. and P. S. White[eds.]. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York, NY. Google Scholar

68.

Platt, W. J. and D. R. Strong. 1989. Special feature: Gaps in forest ecology. Ecology 70: 535. Google Scholar

69.

Platt, W. J. and I. M. Weis. 1977. Resource partitioning and competition within a guild of fugitive prairie plants. Am. Nat. 111: 479–513. Google Scholar

70.

Platt, W. J., R. F. Doren, and T. V. Armentano. 2000. Effects of Hurricane Andrew on stands of slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. densa) in the Everglades region of south Florida (USA). Plant Ecol. 146: 43–60. Google Scholar

71.

Provencher, L., A. R. Litt, D. R. Gordon, H. L. Rodgers, B. J. Herring, K. E. M. Galley, J. P. McAdoo, S. J. McAdoo, N. M. Gobris, and J. L. Hardesty. 2001. Restoration fire and hurricanes in longleaf pine sandhills. Ecol. Restor. 19: 92–98. Google Scholar

72.

Rantis, P.-A. and J. E. Johnson. 2002. Understory development in canopy gaps of pine and pine-hardwood forests of the upper Coastal Plain of Virginia. Plant Ecol. 159: 103–115. Google Scholar

73.

Rebertus, A. J. and B. R. Burns. 1997. The importance of gap processes in the development and maintenances of oak savannas and dry forests. J. Ecol. 85: 635–645. Google Scholar

74.

Runkle, J. R. 1985. Disturbance regimes in temperate forests, pp. 17–33. In S. T. A. Pickettand P. S. White[eds.]. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, New York, NY. Google Scholar

75.

Runkle, J. R. 1992. Guidelines and Sample Protocol for Sampling Forest Gaps. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-283. Google Scholar

76.

Runkle, J. R. 1998. Changes in southern Appalachian canopy tree gaps sample thrice. Ecology 79: 1768–1780. Google Scholar

77.

Schliemann, S. A., and J. G. Brockheim. 2011. Methods for studying treefall gaps. For. Ecol. Manag. 261: 1143–1151. Google Scholar

78.

Schmalzer, P. A. 2003. Growth and recovery of oak-saw palmetto scrub through ten years after fire. Nat. Areas J. 23: 5–13. Google Scholar

79.

Schmalzer, P. A. and T. E. Foster. 2016. Flora and threatened and endangered plants of Canaveral National Seashore, Florida. Castanea 81: 91–127. Google Scholar

80.

Schmalzer, P. A. and C. R. Hinkle. 1992. Recovery of oak–saw palmetto after fire. Castanea 57: 158–173. Google Scholar

81.

Schmalzer, P. A., S. R. Boyle, and H. M. Swain. 1999. Scrub ecosystems of Brevard County, Florida: A regional characterization. Fla. Sci. 62: 13–47. Google Scholar

82.

Schmalzer, P. A., D. R. Breininger, F. Adrian, R. Schaub, and B. W. Duncan. 1994. Development and implementation of a scrub habitat compensation plan for Kennedy Space Center. Kennedy Space Center, FL. NASA Technical Memorandum 109202. Google Scholar

83.

Schmalzer, P. A., S. R. Turek, T. E. Foster, C. A. Dunlevy, and F. W. Adrian. 2002. Reestablishing Florida scrub in a former agricultural site: Survival and growth of planted species and changes in community composition. Castanea 67: 146–160. Google Scholar

84.

Spies, T. A., J. F. Franklin, and M. Klopsch. 1990. Canopy gaps in Douglas-fir forests of the Cascade Mountains. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 649–658. Google Scholar

85.

Stout, I. J. 2001. Rare plants of the Florida scrub. Nat. Areas J. 21: 50–60. Google Scholar

86.

Stover, D. B., F. P. Day, J. R. Butnor, and B. G. Drake. 2007. Effect of elevated CO2 on coarse-root biomass in Florida scrub detected by ground-penetrating radar. Ecology 88: 1328–1334. Google Scholar

87.

Thaxton, J. M. and W. J. Platt. 2006. Small-scale fuel variation alters fire intensity and shrub abundance in a pine savanna. Ecology 87: 1331–1337. Google Scholar

88.

Tozer, K. N., D. F. Chapman, P. E. Quigley, P. M. Dowling, R. D. Cousens, G. A. Kearney, and J. R. Sedcole. 2008. Controlling invasive annual grasses in grazed pastures: Population dynamics and critical gap sizes. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 1152–1159. Google Scholar

89.

Turner, M. G., W. H. Romme, and D. B. Tinker. 2003. Surprises and lessons from the 1988 Yellowstone fires. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1: 351–358. Google Scholar

90.

Turner, M. G., W. W. Hargrove, R. H. Gardner, and W. H. Romme. 1994. Effects of fire on landscape heterogeneity in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. J. Veg. Sci. 5: 731–742. Google Scholar

91.

Wally, A. L., E. S. Menges, and C. W. Weekley. 2006. Comparison of three devices for estimating fire temperatures in ecological studies. Appl. Veg. Sci. 9: 97–108. Google Scholar

92.

Watt, A. S. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. J. Ecol. 35: 1–22. Google Scholar

93.

Weekley, C. W., D. Gagnon, E. S. Menges, P. F. Quintana-Ascencio, and S. Saha. 2007. Variation in soil moisture in relation to rainfall, vegetation, gaps, and time-since-fire in Florida scrub. Ecoscience 14: 377–386. Google Scholar

94.

Whelan, R. J. 1995. The Ecology of Fire. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar

95.

White, P. S. 1979. Pattern, process, and natural disturbance in vegetation. Bot. Rev. 45: 229–299. Google Scholar

96.

Williams, R. J. 1992. Gaps in subalpine heathland and grassland vegetation in south-eastern Australia. J. Ecol 80: 343–352. Google Scholar

97.

Wunderlin, R. P. and B. F. Hansen. 2011. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Florida, 3rd ed. University Presses of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Google Scholar

98.

Yamamoto, S.-I. 1992. The gap theory in forest dynamics. J. Plant Res. 105: 375–383. Google Scholar

99.

Yao, A. W., J. M. Chiang, R. McEwan, and T. C. Lin. 2015. The effect of typhoon-related defoliation on the ecology of gap dynamics in a subtropical forest of Taiwan. J. Veg. Sci. 26: 145–154. Google Scholar

100.

Young, C. C. and E. S. Menges. 1999. Postfire gap-phase regeneration in scrubby flatwoods on the Lake Wales Ridge. Fla. Sci. 62: 1–12. Google Scholar

101.

Zhu, J., D. Luand W. Zhang. 2014. Effects of gaps on regeneration of woody plants: A meta-analysis. J. For. Res. 25: 501–510. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] This study was conducted under National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts NAS10-11624, NAS10-12180, NAS10-02001, NNKO8OQ01C, and NNK16OB01C. We thank R. Schaub and V. Larson for marking the gaps initially, S. Turek and C. Dunlevy for field assistance early in the project, and the Student Life Sciences Training Program classes from 1995 to 2005 for assistance in collecting gap data. The fire management staff of Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge conducted prescribed burns on the site. We thank Eric Menges and several reviewers for their comments.

[2] Supplementary material Supplemental material for this article is online at  http://dx.doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-17-00037.1.

©Copyright 2018 by The Torrey Botanical Society
Paul A. Schmalzer and Tammy E. Foster "Dynamics of gaps created by burning in Florida oak–saw palmetto (Quercus, Fagaceae–Serenoa repens, Arecaceae) scrub1,2," The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 145(3), 250-262, (10 August 2018). https://doi.org/10.3159/TORREY-D-17-00037.1
Received: 14 August 2017; Published: 10 August 2018
KEYWORDS
Quercus
restoration
scrub oaks
Serenoa
slash pile
Sprouting
Back to Top