This assessment of the article by Aria-Nasab et al. (2016), on the palynostratigraphy of the upper part of the Shishtu Formation (Shishtu 2) in central Iran, reveals many shortcomings. The majority of the defects are judged to reflect unwarranted or erroneous taxonomic identifications of the adversely preserved miospores. This, in turn, casts considerable doubt on the compositional integrity of Aria-Nasab et al.'s three proposed stratigraphically successive miospore assemblages, which they dated as encompassing the mid Tournaisian through late Viséan; i.e. within the generalised Mississippian age for Shishtu 2 that had previously been established from marine faunal evidence. We confirm, through examination of their illustrations, the presence of recycled Late Devonian palynomorphs, including Retispora lepidophyta. A late Tournaisian through late Viséan or early Serpukhovian age for the sampled Shishtu 2 section is suggested here.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 2017
The Palynostratigraphy of the Lower Carboniferous (Middle Tournaisian—Upper Viséan) Shishtu Formation from the Howz-e-Dorah Section, Southeast Tabas, Central Iranian Basin: Discussion
Geoffrey Playford,
Hossein Hashemi,
Reed Wicander
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.

Palynology
Vol. 41 • No. 4
October 2017
Vol. 41 • No. 4
October 2017
Central Iran Basin
Mississippian
palynostratigraphy
Shishtu
Formation