BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 12 February 2025 between 18:00-21:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2015 Late Permian (Wuchiapingian) Brachiopod Fauna from the Lower Takakurayama Formation, Abukuma Mountains, Northeastern Japan
Jun-Ichi Tazawa, Naotomo Kaneko, Chisato Suzuki, Satoshi Hasegawa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This study describes a brachiopod fauna, consisting of 15 species in 15 genera, from the lower part of the Takakurayama Formation at the locality T1 in the Takakurayama area, Abukuma Mountains, South Kitakami Belt, northeastern Japan. The fauna is considered to be late Permian (Wuchiapingian) in age based on the occurrence of Haydenella wenganensis, Costatumulus tazawai and Pterospirifer alatus. In terms of palaeobiogeography, the Takakurayama (T1) fauna is a mixed Boreal—Tethyan fauna with Chonetinella, Lamnimargus, Megousia, Costalumulus, Yakovlevia, Neospirifer, Gypospirifer, Alispiriferella and Pterospirifer as the Boreal (anti-tropical) elements, and Haydenella, Transennatia and Echinauris as the Tethyan (tropical) elements. The fauna is allied with the middle—late Permian brachiopod fauna of South Primorye, Far Eastern Russia.

Introduction

The Takakurayama area in the Abukuma Mountains. South Kitakami Belt, northeastern Japan (Figure 1) is a renowned Pennian fossil locality in Japan. Many fossils of marine invertebrates and land plants have been previously described from the Pennian Takakurayama Fonnation, including foraminifers (Ueno, 1992), brachiopods (Yanagisawa, 1967; Nakamura, 1972; Tazawa, 1999b, 2008b), pelecypods (Yanagisawa, 1967; Nakazawa and Newell, 1968). cephalopods (Hayasaka, 1957, 1965; Yanagisawa, 1967; Tazawa et al., 2005; Ehiro, 2008; Fujikawa and Suzuki, 2011), trilobites (Yanagisawa, 1958, 1967; Endo and Matsumoto, 1962; Koizumi, 1972, 1974; Kobayashi and Hamada, 1984) and plants (Asama, 1974).

However, there is little agreement on the age of the Takakurayama Formation, especially of the lower part, owing to a lack of systematic studies of the fossils. Until now, only six brachiopod species (Yanagisawa, 1967; Tazawa, 1999b; Tazawa, 2008b) and four ammonoid species (Fujikawa and Suzuki, 2011) have been described from locality T1, a single fossil locality of the lower part of the Takakurayama Formation (= Iriishikura Formation of Yanagisawa and Nemoto, 1961). The lower part of the formation has variously been assigned to the lower Permian (Sakmarian—Kungurian) by Yanagisawa (1967) and Nakazawa and Newell (1968), the middle Permian (Wordian) by Ehiro and Okami (1989) and the upper Permian (Wuchiapingian) by Tazawa (2008b).

The present study describes the brachiopod species from the lower part of the Takakurayama Formation at the locality T1 in the B-sawa Valley (named by Yanagisawa and Nemoto, 1961), a tributary of the Sodetamayamagawa River, in the Takakurayama area, and discusses the age and palaeobiogeography of the brachiopod fauna. In this study, C. Suzuki prepared the brachiopod specimens; N. Kaneko and S. Hasegawa studied the stratigraphy of the Takakurayama Formation; and J. Tazawa studied the systematics of the brachiopods. The specimens described herein are registered and housed in the Geological Museum, Geological Survey of Japan, AIST, Tsukuba with prefix GSJ F.

Figure 1.

Map showing the surveyed area, enclosed by solid line, and fossil localities T1, T7 and T8 in the Takakurayama area (using the topographical map “Yotsukura” scale 1:25,000 published by the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan).

f01_33.jpg

Stratigraphy

The Takakurayama Fonnation (named by Onuki, 1966) is distributed on an area of about 3 km2 on the northeastern slope of Mt. Takakurayama. with a general NNE-SSW strike and dip of 30°–58° toward the WNW (Figure 2). The fonnation consists mainly of black shale with subordinate sandstone and conglomerate, and exceeds 805 m in total thickness (Figure 3). The black shale of the Takakurayama Fonnation is lithologically similar to that of the upper Permian Toyoma Fonnation (Onuki. 1969) in the southern Kitakami Mountains, northeastern Japan, and the conglomerate is correlated with the Usuginu-type conglomerate (Kano. 1971). which is widely distributed in the upper Pennian of Japan.

The fossil locality T1 (Figures 1, 3) occurs in the upper stream of B-sawa Valley (lat. 37°7′57″N. long. 140°55′8″E), where there occurs alternation of dark grey, fine-grained sandstone and dark grey shale in the lower part of the Takakurayama Formation, about 255 m above its base.

Brachiopod fauna from the lower Takakurayama Formation

The brachiopod fauna from the locality T1 consists of the following 15 species in 15 genera: Chonetinella krotovi (Fredericks, 1925), Rugoconcha sp., Haydenella wenganensis (Huang, 1932), Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen, 1884), Lamnimargus peregrinus (Fredericks. 1924b), Echinauris sp., Megousia auriculata Muir-Wood and Cooper. 1960, Costatumulus tazawai Shen, Archbold, Shi and Chen, 2000, Yakovlevia mammatiformis (Fredericks, 1926), Hustedia ratburiensis Waterhouse and Piyasin, 1970, Neospirifer sp., Gypospirifer kobiyamai Tazawa and Araki, 2013, Alispiriferella sp., Pterospirifer alatus (von Schlotheim. 1813) and Dielasma sp.

The geographical and stratigraphical distributions of the brachiopod species of the Takakurayama (T1) fauna are summarized in Figure 4. It is noteworthy that 6 species (Chonetinella krotovi, Haydenella wenganensis, Transennatia gratiosa, Lamnimargus peregrinus, Costatumulus tazawai and Gypospirifer kobiyamai) also occur in the upper part of the Takakurayama Formation at the localities T7 and T8 (Figures 1. 3, 4).

Figure 2.

Geological map of the Takakurayama area.

f02_33.jpg

Age and correlation

Chonetinella krotovi, Transennatia gratiosa and Lamnimargus peregrinus are known from the Wordian— Changhsingian; Haydenella wenganensis is known from the Wuchiapingian—Changhsingian; Gypospirifer kobiyamai is known from the Wordian—Wuchiapingian; and Pterospirifer alatus is known from the Capitanian— Wuchiapingian. Costatumulus tazawai is restricted to the Wuchiapingian. Megousia auriculata, Yakovlevia mammatiformis and Hustedia ratburiensis are long-ranging species.

Figure 3.

Generalized columnar section of the Takakurayama Formation in the Takakurayama area, showing the fossil horizons of T1, T7, T8.

f03_33.jpg

In summary, the age of the Takakurayama (T1) fauna is considered to be Capitanian—Wuchiapingian, most probably Wuchiapingian. The brachiopods from the upper part of the Takakurayama Formation at localities T7 and T8 indicate a Wuchiapingian—Changhsingian age, probably Wuchiapingian (Tazawa, 2008b). Therefore, the whole of the Takakurayama Formation is assigned to the upper Permian (Wuchiapingian), and is correlated with the lower part of the Toyoma Formation, including the Usuginu-type conglomerate, in the southern Kitakami Mountains, northeastern Japan.

Sedimentary environment of the Daido Fonnation (equivalent of the Toyoma Formation) and the Usuginu Conglomerate is considered to be a deep-water turbidite basin (Yoshida and Machiyama, 1997, 1998). The early Pennian (Sakmarian-Artinskian) ammonoids (Thalassoceras? sp., Agathiceras sp., Paragastrioceras? sp. and Artinskia sp.). described by Fujikawa and Suzuki (2011) from the locality T1, are poorly preserved and may have been reworked into these late Pennian (Wuchiapingian) turbidites, as was stated by the authors (p. 64), “we cannot say for certain whether these fossils are reworked or not”.

Palaeobiogeography

The Takakurayama (T1) fauna includes the Boreal (anti-tropical) elements Chonetinella krotovi, Lamnimargus peregrinus, Megousia auriculata, Costatumulus tazawai, Yakovlevia mammatiformis, Neospirifer sp., Gypospirifer kobiyamai, Alispiriferella sp. and Pterospirifer alatus, and also the Tethyan (tropical) elements Haydenella wenganensis, Transennatia gratiosa and Echinauris sp. Consequently, the fauna is a mixed Boreal—Tethyan fauna, with a predominance of Boreal elements. In terms of the specific composition, the Takakurayama (T1) fauna is closest to the middle—upper Pennian brachiopod fauna of South Primorye. Far Eastern Russia (Fredericks. 1924b. 1925; Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978; Kotlyar, 1989). The following five species are common to both faunas: Chonetinella krotovi, Transennatia gratiosa, Lamnimargus peregrinus, Yakovlevia mammatiformis and Gypospirifer kobiyamai.

These data suggest that in the late Pennian (Wuchiapingian) the South Kitakami region, including the Takakurayama area, was located in the mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, the Inner Mongolia—Japan Transitional Zone (Tazawa, 1991, 1998, 2007) and/or the Sino-Mongolian—Japanese Province (Shi and Tazawa, 2001; Shi, 2006; Shen et al., 2009), a transitional zone between the Boreal and Tethyan realms in East Asia, and close to South Primorye. This conclusion is in agreement with Tazawa's (2008c, 2011, 2012) late Permian reconstruction of Proto-Japan (i.e., the Hida Gaien, South Kitakami and Kurosegawa belts).

Systematic descriptions

(by J. Tazawa)
Order Productida Sarytcheva and Sokolskaya, 1959
Suborder Chonetidina Muir-Wood, 1955
Superfamily Chonetoidea Bronn, 1862
Family Rugosochonetidae Muir-Wood, 1962
Subfamily Rugosochonetinae Muir-Wood, 1962
Genus Chonetinella Ramsbottom, 1952

  • Type species.—Chonetes flemingi Norwood and Pratten, 1855

  • Chonetinella krotovi (Fredericks, 1925)
    Figure 5.1

  • Chonetes (Chonetina) krotovi Fredericks, 1925, p. 6, pl. 1, figs. 54–57.

  • Chonetina substrophomenoides forma A Shimizu, 1961, p. 317, pl. 16, figs. 11–14.

  • Chonetes uralicns Moeller. Yanagisawa, 1967, p. 86, pl. 1, fig. 11.

  • Waagenites aff. striata Liao. Yanagida, 1996, fig. 2.10.

  • Chonetinella krotovi (Fredericks). Tazawa, 2008b, p. 19, figs. 3.1–3.7; Tazawa, 2009, p. 69, fig. 4.1.

  • Material.—One specimen, a ventral valve, GSJ F18045.

  • Remarks,—The single ventral valve specimen from Takakurayama is small in size (length 6 mm, width 7 mm), slightly transverse, subquadrate in outline, strongly convex in lateral profile, and having a deep and narrow sulcus bordered by a pair of high, broad lateral ridges. External surface of the ventral valve is ornamented by numerous capillae on the whole valve except for the posterior half of the ears. The specimen is referred to Chonetinella krotovi (Fredericks, 1925), from the Chandalaz Formation of South Primorye, Russian Far East, in size and shape of the ventral valve and in having a deep and narrow sulcus bordered by a pair of high, broad ridges.

  • Distribution.—Wordian—Changhsingian: Far Eastern Russia (South Primorye), northeastern Japan (Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt) and southwestern Japan (Kawahigashi in the Maizuru Belt and Tsunemori in the Akiyoshi Belt).

  • Figure 4.

    Geographical and stratigraphical distributions of brachiopod species of the Takakurayama (T1) fauna, excluding five species uncertain.

    f04_33.jpg

    Suborder Productidina Waagen, 1883
    Superfamily Productelloidea Schuchert, 1929
    Family Overtoniidae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Subfamily Plicatiferinae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Tribe Plicatiferini Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Genus Rugoconcha Jin and Sun, 1981

  • Type species.—Plicatifera chaoi Grabau, 1936.

  • Rugoconcha sp.
    Figure 5.2

  • Material.—One specimen, external mould of a dorsal valve. GSJ F18046.

  • Description.—Shell small size for genus, transversely subrectangular in outline, with greatest width slightly anterior to hinge; length about 16 mm, width about 18 mm in the single dorsal valve specimen (GSJ F18046). Dorsal valve gently convex, nearly flat on visceral disc, not geniculated; ears large, not clearly demarcated from visceral region; no fold. External surface of dorsal valve ornamented by numerous, strong, subangular and somewhat irregular concentric rugae on whole valve, numbering 3–4 rugae in 3 mm at about midlength; interspaces of rugae broad, with rounded bottom; no spines on valve entirely.

  • Remarks.—The material available is lacking the ventral valve, but is safely assigned to the genus Rugoconcha by its size, shape and external ornament of the dorsal valve. The Takakurayama specimen resembles the type species. Rugoconcha chaoi (Grabau, 1936, p. 171, pl. 6, fig. 9; pl. 8, fig. 2; pl. 14, figs. 21, 22), from the Maping Limestone of Guangxi, central-southern China and Guizhou, south-western China, but the Chinese species is somewhat larger in size.

  • Rugoconcha xainzaensis Yang and Fan (1983, p. 269, pl. 1. figs. 18. 19), from the upper Carboniferous Susuo Formation of Xainza, northern Xizang (Tibet), differs from the present species in its much smaller size.

  • Figure 5.

    1, Chonetinella krotovi (Fredericks), ventral view of ventral valve, GSJ F18045; 2, Rugoconcha sp.; 2a, 2b, dorsal view of external latex cast and external mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18046; 3, 4, Haydenella wenganensis (Huang); 3a, 3b, ventral view of external latex cast and internal mould of ventral valve, GSJ F18047; 4a, 4b, ventral view of internal mould of ventral valve and pseudopunctae on the surface of the specimen, GSJ F18048; 5–10, Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen); 5a, 5b, dorsal and lateral views of external mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18051; 6, ventral view of external latex cast of ventral valve, GSJ F18052; 7, dorsal view of external mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18063; 8a, 8b, 8c, dorsal, anterior and lateral views of external mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18056; 9a, 9b, 9c, dorsal view of external latex cast of dorsal valve, and dorsal and lateral views of external mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18058; 10, dorsal view of external mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18064; 11–13, Lamnimaigus peregrinus (Fredericks); 11, ventral view of internal mould of ventral valve, GSJ F18076; 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d, ventral, anterior, posterior and lateral views of internal mould of ventral valve, GSJ F18067; 13, ventral view of internal mould of ventral valve, GSJ F18071. Scale bars represent 1 cm.

    f05_33.jpg

    Family Productinidae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Subfamily Chonetellinae Licharew in Sarytcheva et al., 1960
    Genus Haydenella Reed, 1944

  • Type species.—Productus kiangsiensis Kayser, 1883.

  • Haydenella wenganensis (Huang, 1932)
    Figures 5.3, 5.4

  • Linoproductus kiangsiensis var. wenganensis Huang, 1932, p. 49, pl. 3, figs. 16–18.

  • Haydenella kiangsiensis wenganensis (Huang). Zhan, 1979, p. 81, pl. 5, figs. 1, 2.

  • Haydenella wenganensis (Huang). Liao, 1980, pl. 6, figs. 32, 33; Zeng et al., 1995, pl. 5, fig. 5.

  • Haydenella sp. Tazawa, 2008b, p. 24, fig. 3.20.

  • Material.—Four specimens: (1) external and internal moulds of a ventral valve, GSJ F18047; (2) internal moulds of three ventral valves, GSJ F18048—18050.

  • Description.—Shell small size for genus, transverse subelliptical in outline, with greatest width at hinge; length 12 mm. width 15 mm in the best preserved specimen (GSJ F18047). Ventral valve strongly and unevenly convex in lateral profile, most convex at umbonal region, slightly convex on anterior half of valve, not geniculated; strongly and unevenly convex in anterior profile, with nearly flat venter and steeply inclined lateral slopes; umbo small, tapering and scarcely projecting over hinge; ears small, slightly convex; no sulcus. External surface of ventral valve nearly smooth, faintly costellate; a row of spine bases at base of ears; numerous, very fine tubercles (pseudopunctae) scattered on decorticated surface of valve (Figure 5.4b). Internal structures of ventral valve obscure.

  • Remarks.—These specimens are referred to Haydenella wenganensis (Huang, 1932). originally described as Linoproductus kiangsiensis var. wenganensis Huang, 1932 from the upper Permian of Guizhou, southwestern China, in size, shape and external ornament of the ventral valves. The Takakurayama specimens resemble well the shells of H. wenganensis, described or figured by Zhan (1979), Liao (1980) and Zeng et al. (1995) from the Wuchiapingian—Changhsingian of Guangdong, Guizhou and Sichuan, respectively.

  • Haydenella minuta Sarytcheva (in Sarytcheva and Sokolskaya. 1965, p. 228. pl. 38. figs. 10. 14). from the Dzulfian and Induan stages of Armenia is similar in size, but the Armenian species differs from H. wenganensis in having stronger costae on the ventral valve.

  • The single ventral valve specimen, described by Shimizu (1961, p. 326, pl. 15, figs. 16, 17) as Linoproductus kiangsiensis (Kayser, 1883) from the upper Permian Maizuru Group of Kawahigashi, Maizuru Belt, south-western Japan, is also a small-sized Haydenella species, but it differs from H. wenganensis in having numerous fine costae on the ventral valve.

  • Distribution.—Wuchiapingian—Changhsingian: north-eastern Japan (Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt), central-southern China (Guangdong) and south-western China (Guizhou and Sichuan).

  • Superfamily Marginiferoidea Stehli, 1954
    Family Marginiferidae Stehli, 1954
    Subfamily Marginiferinae Stehli, 1954
    Genus Transennatia Waterhouse, 1975

  • Type species.—Productus gratiosus Waagen, 1884.

  • Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen, 1884)
    Figures 5.5–5.10

  • Productus gratiosus Waagen, 1884, p. 691, pl. 72, figs. 3–7; Diener, 1897, p. 23, pl. 3, figs. 3–7; Mansuy, 1913. p. 115, pl. 13. fig. 1; Colani, 1919, p. 10, pl. 1, fig. 2; Chao, 1927, p. 44, pl. 4, figs. 6– 10; Chi-Thuan, 1962, p. 491. pl. 2. figs. 5–7.

  • Productus (Dictyoclostus) gratiosus Waagen. Huang, 1933, p. 88, pl. 11, fig. 14; Hayasaka, 1960, p. 49, pl. 1, fig. 8.

  • Marginifera gratiosa (Waagen). Reed, 1944, p. 98, pl. 19, figs. 6, 7.

  • Dictyoclostus gratiosus (Waagen). Zhang and Jin, 1961, p. 411, pl. 4, figs. 12–18; Wang et al., 1964, p. 291, pl. 45, figs. 14–19; Leman, 1994, pl. 1, figs. 11–13.

  • Gratiosina gratiosa (Waagen). Grant, 1976, pl. 33, figs. 19–26; Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978, pl. 12, figs. 5. 6; pl. 20. fig. 1; Minato et al., 1979, pl. 61, figs. 11–13.

  • Asioproductus gratiosus (Waagen). Yang et al., 1977, p. 350, pl. 140, fig. 5; Feng and Jiang. 1978. p. 254, pl. 90. figs. 1, 2; Tong, 1978, p. 228. pl. 80, fig. 7; Lee et al., 1980, p. 373, pl. 164, fig. 14; pl. 166, figs. 5, 6.

  • Gratiosina sp., Minato et al., 1979, pl. 61, fig. 14.

  • Dictyoclostus minor Lee and Gu in Lee et al., 1980, p. 372, pl. 166, figs. 1–4.

  • Transennatia gratiosus (Waagen). Wang et al., 1982, p. 214, pl. 92, figs. 6–8; pl. 102, figs. 4–9; Liu et al., 1982, p. 185, pl. 132, fig. 9; Ding and Qi, 1983, p. 280, pl. 95, fig. 14; Zeng et al., 1995, pl. 5, figs. 14, 15.

  • Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen). Yang, 1984, p. 219, pl. 33, fig. 7; Jin, 1985, pl. 4, figs. 33, 34, 45, 46; Tazawa and Matsumoto, 1998, p. 6, pl. 1, figs. 4–8; Tazawa et al., 2000, p. 7, pl. 1, figs. 3–5; Tazawa, 2001, p. 289, figs. 6.1–6.7; Tazawa and Ibaraki, 2001, p. 7, pl. 1, figs. 1–3; Shen et al., 2002, p. 676, figs. 4.27–4.31; Tazawa, 2002, fig. 10.2; Chen et al., 2005. p. 354. figs. 10E–10H, 11; Tazawa, 2008b, p. 26, fig. 4.1; Tazawa, 2008c, p. 43, figs. 6.6, 6.7; Shen and Zhang, 2008, figs. 4.20–4.22; Shen and Clapham, 2009, p. 718, pl. 1, figs. 13–22; Shen and Shi. 2009. p. 157. figs. 3K–3O.

  • Material.—Sixteen specimens: (1) external mould of a ventral valve, GSJ F18052; (2) internal moulds of two ventral valves, GSJ F18053, 18054; (3) external moulds of thirteen dorsal valves, GSJ F18051, 18055–18066.

  • Description.—Shell small size for genus, transversely subquadrate in outline, with greatest width at hinge; length 13 mm, width about 20 mm in the largest dorsal valve specimen (GSJ F18066). Ventral valve strongly and unevenly convex in lateral profile, most convex at umbonal region, strongly geniculated and followed by long trail; umbo small, slightly incurved; ears small, pointed; sulcus narrow and deep; lateral slopes steep. Dorsal valve nearly flat on visceral disc, strongly geniculated and followed by long trail; fold invisible on visceral disc, but highly developed on trail. External surface of both valves reticulate on visceral disc and costate on trail; costae converging into ventral sulcus and dorsal fold anteriorly; numbering 7 costae in 5 mm at midlength of dorsal valve; spines or spine bases absent. Ventral interior with small, elongate, highly raised adductor scars and large, flabellate, longitudinally striated diductor scars in posterior portion of valve. Dorsal interior not observed.

  • Remarks.—These specimens are referred to Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen, 1884). originally described from the Wargal and Chhidru formations of the Salt Range, in their small size, strongly convex ventral valve and sharply reticulate ornament on the visceral disc of both valves, although the Takakurayama specimens are smaller in size than the type specimens from the Salt Range (Waagen, 1884, pl. 72. figs. 3–7).

  • Transennatia insculpta (Grant, 1976, p. 135. pl. 32. figs. 1–37; pl. 33, figs. 1–36), from the Ratburi Lime-stone of Ko Muk, southern Thailand, is also a small-sized Transennatia species, but it differs from T. gratiosa in its more transverse outline, more prominent ears and coarser costae on the ventral valve.

  • Distribution.—Wordian—Changhsingian: northwestern China (Shaanxi), northeastern China (Heilongjiang and Jilin), Russian Far East (South Primorye), northeastern Japan (Setamai, Kamiyasse, Kesennuma, Ogatsu and Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt), central Japan (Moribu and Oguradani in the Hida Gaien Belt), south-western Japan (Mizukoshi in Kyushu Island, western extension of the Hida Gaien Belt), eastern China (Zhejiang, Anhui and Jiangxi), central-southern China (Hubei, Hunan, Guangdong and Guangxi), southwestern China (Guizhou, Sichuan and Yunnan), Tibet (Xizang), Vietnam, Cambodia (Sisophon), Malaysia, Nepal (Kumaon Himalayas). Pakistan (Salt Range) and Greece (Hydra Island).

  • Family Paucispiniferidae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Subfamily Paucispiniferinae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Tribe Paucispiniferini Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Genus Lamnimargus Waterhouse, 1975

  • Type species.—Marginifera himalayensis Diener, 1899.

  • Lamnimargus peregrinus (Fredericks, 1924b)
    Figures 5.11–5.13

  • Paramarginiferci peregrina Fredericks, 1924b, p. 24, pl. 1, figs. 7, 8; Fredericks, 1925, p. 12, pl. 1, figs. 41–44.

  • Dictyoclostus zesiensis Lee and Gu, 1976, p. 256, pl. 167, figs. 5, 6; pl. 170, fig. 1.

  • Probolionia caucasica peregrina (Fredericks). Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978, p. 12, figs. 13, 14.

  • Paramarginifera? peregrina Fredericks. Duan and Li, 1985, p. 112, pl. 42, figs. 1–7; Lee et al. 1980. p. 356, pl. 166, figs. 18, 28.

  • Lamnimargus himalayensis (Diener). Kotlyar, 1989, pl. 23, fig. 9.

  • Lamnimargus peregrina (Fredericks). Wang and Zhang, 2003, p. 73, pl. 14, figs. 3, 8, 9; pl. 15. fig. 11; pl. 21, figs. 14–16, 22–24.

  • Lamnimargus peregrinus (Fredericks). Tazawa, 2008a, p. 7, figs. 3, 4; Tazawa, 2008b, p. 25, figs. 4.2–4.4; Tazawa in Tazawa and Miyake, 2011, p. 4, figs. 3.1–3.3; Tazawa, 2012. p. 21, figs. 4.4, 4.5.

  • Material.—Eleven specimens: (1) internal moulds of three ventral valves, with fragments of external moulds of the valves. GSJ F18067–18069; (2) an abraded ventral valve, GSJ F18070; (3) internal moulds of seven ventral valves, GSJ F18071–18077.

  • Description.—Shell medium size for genus; length 15 mm. width 18 mm in corpus of the largest specimen (GSJ F18067). Ventral valve strongly and unevenly convex in lateral profile, most convex at umbonal slope, bluntly geniculated and followed by long trail; sulcus narrow and deep, originating near umbo and extending to anterior margin; lateral slopes steep. External surface of ventral valve ornamented by numerous costae, numbering 3 in 2 mm at midlength of trail; a row of fine spines along hinge. Ventral interior with a pair of elongate, highly raised, smooth adductor scars and impressed, wide, oval and striated diductor scars; marginal ridge developed at anterior portion.

  • Remarks.—The material available is fragmentarily preserved internal moulds of ventral valves, lacking ears. However, the Takakurayama specimens are referred to Lamnimargus peregrinus (Fredericks, 1924b), from the Chandalaz Formation of the Vladivostok area, South Primorye, Russian Far East, by their size, shape, and external ornamentation of the ventral valve. The Takakurayama specimens resemble well the specimens of L. peregrinus described and figured by Tazawa (2008a, p. 7, figs. 3, 4) from the upper Toyoma Formation of Maeda, Ofunato area, South Kitakami Belt.

  • The type species, Lamnimargus himalayensis (Diener, 1899, p. 39, pl. 2, figs. 1–7; pl. 6, figs. 1, 2), from the Kuling Shales of the Punjab Himalayas, Kashmir, is distinguished from L. peregrinus by its much larger, prominent ears and coarser costellae on the ventral valve.

  • Distribution.—Wordian—Changhsingian: northern China (Inner Mongolia), northeastern China (Heilongjiang), Far Eastern Russia (South Primorye) and northeastern Japan (Ofunato, Kesennuma and Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt).

  • Family Costispiniferidae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Subfamily Costispiniferinae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Genus Echinauris Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960

  • Type species.—Echinauris lateralis Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960.

  • Echinauris sp.
    Figure 6.1

  • Material—Two specimens: (1) external mould of a ventral valve, GSJ F18078; (2) external mould of a dorsal valve, GSJ F18079.

  • Description.—Shell small size for genus, transversely subcircular in outline, with greatest width at midlength; length 11 mm, width 13 mm in the ventral valve specimen (GSJ F18078). Ventral valve strongly and unevenly convex in lateral profile, maximum curvature in posterior third, not geniculated; anterior profile domed, with steep sides; umbonal region broadly swollen; ears small; sulcus wide and shallow in anterior slope. Dorsal valve evenly and moderately concave; ears small, flattened; fold absent. External surface of ventral valve ornamented by very fine growth lines and numerous stout spines, scattered over venter, numbering 2–3 in 3 mm width at about midlength of valve. External ornament of dorsal valve similar to the opposite valve. Internal structure of both ventral and dorsal valves not preserved.

  • Remarks.—This specimen is safely assigned to the genus Echinauris by its small size, subcircular outline, and numerous stout spines on the ventral valve. The Takakurayama specimen resembles Echinauris irregularis Cooper and Grant (1975, p. 1008. pl. 329. figs. 1– 24; pl. 330. figs. 1–43; pl. 331. figs. 1–34; pl. 332. figs. 25–32). from the upper Wolfcampian and Leonardian of western Texas, but differs from the latter in having no interrupted costae on the ventral valve.

  • The type species, Echinauris lateralis Muir-Wood and Cooper (1960, p. 222, pl. 68, figs. 1–13). from the Word Formation of the Glass Mountains, western Texas, is distinguished from the Takakurayama species by its larger and elongate oval shell.

  • Echinauris opuntia (Waagen, 1884, p. 707, pl. 79, figs. 1, 2), from the Wargal Formation of the Salt Range, is distinguished from the present species by its slightly elongate outline and less stout spines on the ventral valve.

  • Superfamily Linoproductoidea Stehli, 1954
    Family Linoproductidae Stehli, 1954
    Subfamily Anidanthinae Waterhouse, 1968b
    Genus Megousia Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960

  • Type species.—Megousia auriculata Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960.

  • Megousia auriculata Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Figure 6.2

  • Linoproductus waagenites Girty. King, 1931. p. 77, pl. 17, figs. 11–15 only.

  • Megousia auriculata Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960, p. 310, pl. 113, figs. 1–11; Ferguson, 1969, pl. 1, figs. 5–11; Nakamura, 1972, p. 436, pl. 2, fig. 3; Cooper and Grant, 1975, p. 1192. pl. 450, figs. 1–48; pl. 451, figs. 1–49; pl. 452, figs. 19–28; pl. 453, figs. 13– 24; pl. 463, figs. 5–8; pl. 467. figs. 9–13; Tazawa, 2012. p. 25, figs. 3.8–3.10.

  • Megousia cf. auriculata Nakamura, 1972, p. 437, pl. 2, fig. 2.

  • Material.—Two specimens: (1) internal mould of a conjoined shell, with external mould of the ventral valve, GSJ F18080; (2) internal mould of a ventral valve, GSJ F18081.

  • Description.—Shell medium size for genus, transversely wider subcylindrical in outline, with greatest width at hinge; length 11 mm. width about 24 mm in the better preserved specimen (GSJ F18080). Ventral valve strongly convex in lateral profile; umbo narrowly swollen; ears large, prominent; lateral slopes steep. Dorsal valve moderately convex in lateral profile, strongly geniculated and followed by short trail; ears long, slender; fold broad and low on trail. External surface of dorsal valve ornamented by strong, irregular concentric lamellae and numerous fine costellae, numbering 8–9 in 5 mm at midlength; ears also ornamented with radial costellae. Ventral interior with a pair of small, triangular adductor scars and large, flabellate diductor scars. Dorsal interior with a small, short-shafted and trilobed cardinal process, and strong, short median septum.

  • Remarks.—The Takakurayama specimens can be referred to Megousia auriculata Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960, originally described from the Word Formation of the Glass Mountains, western Texas, by their small, very transverse shell and in having radially ribbing, slender ears on the dorsal valve.

  • Megousia nakamurai Tazawa (1975, p. 635. pl. 3, figs. 5, 6). from the upper Toyoma Formation of Nabekoshiyama, Kesennuma area, South Kitakami Belt, is readily distinguished from M. auriculata by its less transverse outline, much broader ears and finer costellae on the dorsal valve.

  • Distribution.—Artinskian—Changhsingian: northeastern Japan (Kesennuma and Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt) and the United States (western Texas).

  • Figure 6.

    1, Echinauris sp., ventral view of external latex cast of ventral valve, GSJ F18078; 2, Megousia auriculata Muir-Wood and Cooper; 2a, 2b, 2c, dorsal view of external mould of dorsal valve, and ventral and dorsal views of internal mould of conjoined shell, GSJ F18080; 3, Costatumulus tazawai Shen, Archbold, Shi and Chen; 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, ventral views of external latex cast and internal mould of ventral valve, ventral and dorsal views of internal mould of conjoined shell, and dorsal view of external mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18082; 4–6, Yakovlevia mammatiformis (Fredericks); 4, dorsal view of external mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18088; 5, external latex cast of ventral valve, GSJ F18086; 6, ventral view of internal mould of ventral valve, GSJ F18087; 7, Hustedia ratburiensis Waterhouse and Piyasin, dorsal view of internal mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18090; 8, Neospirifer sp.; 8a, 8b, dorsal views of external latex cast and internal mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18091; 9, Gypospirifer kobiyamai Tazawa and Araki; 9a, 9b, dorsal views of external latex cast and internal mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18092; 10, Alispiriferella sp.; 10a, 10b, ventral views of internal latex cast and internal mould of ventral valve, GSJ F18094; 11, 12, Pterospirifer alatus (von Schlotheim); 11a, 11b, 11c, ventral view of external latex cast of ventral valve, internal mould of ventral valve, and microornamentation of ventral valve, GSJ F18095; 12a, 12b, dorsal view of external latex cast and external mould of dorsal valve, GSJ F18096; 13, Dielasma sp., 13, ventral view of internal mould of ventral valve, GSJ F18097. Scale bars represent 1 cm.

    f06_33.jpg

    Family Kansuellidae Mur-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Subfamily Auriculispininae Waterhouse, 1986
    Tribe Auriculispinini Waterhouse, 1986
    Genus Costatumulus Waterhouse, 1983

  • Type species.Auriculispina tumida Waterhouse in Waterhouse et al., 1983.

  • Costatumulus tazawai Shen, Archbold, Shi and Chen, 2000
    Figure 6.3

  • Costatumulus tazawai Shen, Archbold, Shi and Chen, 2000, p. 743, figs. 12.1–8, 11–14.

  • Costatumulus cf. tazawai Shen, Archbold, Shi and Chen. Tazawa, 2008b, p. 27, fig. 4.5.

  • Material.—Four specimens: (1) external moulds of a conjoined shell, with internal mould of the dorsal valve, GSJ F18082; (2) external moulds of three dorsal valves, GSJ F18083–18085.

  • Description.—Shell medium size for genus, suboval in outline; length more than 29 mm. width more than 22 mm in the largest specimen (GSJ F18082); length about 12 mm, width about 20 mm in the best preserved dorsal valve specimen. Ventral valve gently convex in lateral profile, with maximum convexity at umbonal slope; ears not preserved; no sulcus. Dorsal valve slightly concave in lateral profile, weakly geniculated and followed by short trail; no fold. External surface of ventral valve ornamented by strong, irregular concentric rugae, numerous, fine costellae and numerous, fine, recumbent spines on whole venter of valve; numbering 12–13 costellae in 5 mm at midlength. External surface of dorsal valve also ornamented by numerous strong rugae, fine costellae and several dimples, but no spines.

  • Remarks.—The specimens from Takakurayama are incompletely preserved and lacking most of the ears, but they can be referred to Costatumulus tazawai Shen, Archbold, Shi and Chen, 2000. from the middle part of the Selong Group of Selong, southern Xizang (Tibet), southwestern China, by their concavo-convex shell, with relatively coarse rugae and fine costellae on both ventral and dorsal valves. Costatumulus cf. tazawai, described by Tazawa (2008b), from the upper part of the Takakurayama Formation in the Takakurayama area, may be conspecific with the present species.

  • Costatumulus polliciformis (Waterhouse, 1978, p. 76. pl. 11, figs. 9–12). from the lower Senja Formation of northwest Nepal, differs from C. tazawai in having less strong rugae and coarser costellae on the ventral valve.

  • The type species. Costatumulus tumida (Waterhouse in Waterhouse et al., 1983. p. 133. pl. 3. figs. 2–4, 6–7). from the Tiverton Fonnation of northern Bowen Basin, eastern Australia, is readily distinguished from C. tazawai by its less strong rugae on the ventral valve.

  • Distribution.—Wuchiapingian: northeastern Japan (Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt) and Xizang (Tibet).

  • Family Yakovleviidae Waterhouse, 1975
    Genus Yakovlevia Fredericks, 1925

  • Type species.—Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks, 1925.

  • Yakovlevia mammatiformis (Fredericks, 1926)
    Figures 6.4–6.6

  • Productus mammatiformis Fredericks, 1926, p. 87, pl. 3, figs. 4–6.

  • Muirwoodia mammatiformis (Fredericks). Solomina, 1960, p. 65, pl. 12, figs. 7, 8; Kulikov, 1974, p. 89, pl. 3, fig. 6.

  • Yakovlevia mammatiformis (Fredericks). Kotlyar, 1961, text-figs. 7, 8; Ustritsky, 1963. p. 12, pl. 2, figs. 6–8; pl. 3, figs. 1–3; Mironova. 1964, p. 97, pl., fig. 14; Zavodowsky and Stepanov, 1970, p. 114, pl. 35. figs. 8–10; Ifanova, 1972, p. 119, pl. 6, figs. 15. 16; pl. 7, figs. 1. 2; Kalashnikov, 1983, p. 210, pl. 49, figs. 5, 6, 9; Manankov, 1991, p. 107, pl. 26, figs. 1–3; Kalashnikov, 1993, p. 61, pl. 16, figs. 1–4; Tazawa, 1999a, fig. 2.3; Tazawa, 1999b, p. 92, fig. 3.6; Klets et al., 2001, pl. 2, fig. 9; Klets, 2005, pl. 32, fig. 9; Tazawa, 2008b, p. 29, fig. 4.13; Tazawa, 2011. p. 175, fig. 4.8.

  • Linoproductus cf. mammatus (Keyserling). Yanagisawa, 1967, p. 88, pl. 2, fig. 7.

  • Yakovlevia sp. Tazawa and Niigata Pre-Tertiary Research Group, 1999, fig. 12 only.

  • Material.—Four specimens: (1) external mould of a ventral valve, GSJ F18086; (2) internal mould of a ventral valve, GSJ F18087; (3) external and internal moulds of a dorsal valve, GSJ F18088; (4) external mould of a dorsal valve, GSJ F18089.

  • Description.—Shell medium size for genus, transversely subrectangular in outline, with greatest width at hinge; length about 20 mm. width more than 36 mm in the largest ventral valve specimen (GSJ F18086). Ventral valve gently convex on visceral disc, strongly geniculated and followed by long trail; umbo small; sulcus narrow and moderately deep; lateral slopes steep. Dorsal

  • valve almost flat on visceral disc, strongly geniculated and followed by long trail. External surface of both valves ornamented by numerous fine costellae; numbering 10–11 costellae in 5 mm at midlength of ventral valve; 12–13 costellae in 5 mm at midlength of dorsal valve; a thick halteroid spine on lateral slope of ventral valve. Ventral interior with a pair of small, elongate adductor scars and large flabellate diductor scars, encircled by a ridge posterolaterally.

  • Remarks.—These specimens can be referred to Yakovlevia mammatiformis (Fredericks, 1926). from the lower Pennian (Artinskian) of the Pechora Basin, northern Russia, in size, shape and external ornament of the ventral valve.

  • Yakovlevia transversa (Cooper, 1957, p. 39. pl. 5, figs. 1–13). from the Coyote Butte Formation of central Oregon, resembles Y. mammatiformis in general appearance, but the former is distinguished from the latter by its smaller dimensions, more strongly developed fold commencing a little below the umbo, and coarser costellae on both the ventral and dorsal valves.

  • Yakovlevia mammata (Keyserling, 1846, p. 206, pl. 4, fig. 5), from the lower Pennian (possibly Sakmarian) of the Pechora Basin, differs from Y. mammatiformis in its smaller size, less transverse outline, and external ornament consisting of more numerous, finer costellae.

  • Distribution.—Sakmarian—Wuchiapingian: Russian Arctic and Far North (Novaya Zemlya, Pechora Basin, Pai Khoi, northern Urals, Verkhoyansk and Omolon Massif), southern Mongolia, northwestern China (Gansu), Russian Far East (South Primorye), northeastern Japan (Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt) and central Japan (Okutadami in the Joetsu Belt).

  • Order Athyridida Boucot, Johnson and Staton, 1964
    Suborder Retziidina Boucot, Johnson and Staton, 1964
    Superfamily Retzioidea Waagen, 1883
    Family Neoretziidae Dagys, 1972
    Subfamily Hustediinae Grunt, 1986
    Genus Hustedia Hall and Clarke, 1893

  • Type species.—Terebratula mormoni Marcou, 1858.

  • Hustedia ratburiensis Waterhouse and Piyasin, 1970
    Figure 6.7

  • Hustedia ratburiensis Waterhouse and Piyasin, 1970, p. 138, pl. 23, figs. 15–30; Grant, 1976, p. 241, pl. 66, figs. 1–69; pl. 67, figs. 51–58; Archbold, 1999, figs. 5E–5H; Yanagida and Nakornsri, 1999, p. 118, pl. 32, figs. 11–16; Tazawa, 2001, p. 299, fig. 8.6; Tazawa, 2008c, p. 53, figs. 8.2–8.6.

  • Hustedia thailandica Waterhouse and Piyasin, 1970, text-figs. 12, 13.

  • Hustedia nakornsrii Yanagida, 1970, p. 79, pl. 14, fig. 9.

  • Material.—One specimen, internal mould of a dorsal valve, GSJ F18090.

  • Remarks.—The single dorsal valve specimen from Takakurayama can be referred to Hustedia ratburiensis Waterhouse and Piyasin, 1970, from the Ratburi Limestone of Khao Phrik, southern Thailand, by its small size (length 7 mm, width 7 mm), subcircular outline, and nine strong costae on the dorsal valve.

  • Hustedia grandicosta (Davidson, 1862). redescribed by Waagen (1883, p. 491, pl. 34, figs. 6–12). from the Amb, Wargal and Chhidru formations of the Salt Range, differs from H. ratburiensis in having more numerous, fine costae on the dorsal valve.

  • Hustedia minuta Tazawa and Miyake (2011, p. 15, figs. 2.5, 2.6), from the upper Toyoma Formation of Maeda, in the Ofunato area, South Kitakami Belt, is distinguished from the present species by its smaller size and in having more numerous costae on the dorsal valve.

  • Distribution.—Kungurian—Wuchiapingian: northeastern Japan (Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt), central Japan (Moribu in the Hida Gaien Belt), southwestern Japan (Mizukoshi, central Kyushu) and southern Thailand (Khao Phrik, Khao Nong Ta On and Khao Hin King).

  • Order Spiriferida Waagen, 1883
    Suborder Spiriferidina Waagen, 1883
    Superfamily Spiriferoidea King, 1846
    Family Trigonotretidae Schuchert, 1893
    Subfamily Neospiriferinae Waterhouse, 1968a
    Genus Neospirifer Fredericks, 1924a

  • Type species.—Spirifer fasciger Keyserling, 1846.

  • Neospirifer sp.
    Figure. 6.8

  • Material.—One specimen, external and internal moulds of a dorsal valve. GSJ F18091.

  • Remarks.—This specimen is safely assigned to the genus Neospirifer by its transverse, medium-sized dorsal valve (length about 25 mm, width about 40 mm), with high, broad fold and ornamented by numerous fasciculate costae and very fine concentric growth lamellae. The Takakurayama species resembles the type species, Neospirifer fasciger (Keyserling, 1846), from the lower Permian of Timan, northern Russia in size and shape of the dorsal valve, but accurate comparison is difficult because of the former's ill preserved cardinal extremities. N. fasciger is characterized by its rounded cardinal extremities (Poletaev, 1997, pl. 4, figs. 2–7).

  • Genus Gypospirifer Cooper and Grant, 1976

  • Type species.—Gypospirifer nelsoni Cooper and Grant, 1976.

  • Gypospirifer kobiyamai Tazawa and Araki, 2013
    Figure 6.9

  • Spirifer fasciger var. simplex Grabau. Kobiyama, 1956, fig. 4.

  • Neospirifer fasciger (Keyserling). Hayasaka, 1960, p. 42, pl. 2, figs. 1, 2 only; Yanagida, 1963, p. 71, pl. 8, figs. 3, 6; pl. 9, fig. 3 only; Koizumi, 1979, pl. 1, fig. 16 only.

  • Neospirifer aff. cameratus Morton, Yanagisawa, 1967, p. 91, pl. 2, fig. 11.

  • Neospirifer striato-paradoxus (Toula). Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978, pl. 18, fig. 1; Lee et al., 1980, p. 412, pl. 177, figs. 3, 6, 9.

  • Gypospirifer volatilis Duan and Li. Tazawa, 2001, p. 302, figs. 8.23– 8.26; Tazawa and Hasegawa, 2007, p. 7, figs. 4.8–4.12, 5.1, 5.2; Tazawa, 2008b, p. 39, fig. 6.17; Tazawa, 2008c, p. 54, figs. 9.3– 9.7.

  • Gypospirifer kobiyamai Tazawa and Araki, 2013, p. 7, figs. 2.3, 2.4.

  • Material.—Two specimens, external and internal moulds of two dorsal valves. GSJ F18092, 18093.

  • Remarks.—The specimens from Takakurayama are fragmentarily preserved, but they can be referred to Gypospirifer kobiyamai Tazawa and Araki, 2013, from the lower Kamiyasse Formation of Kamiyasse, South Kitakami Belt, northeastern Japan, by their large size (length more than 40 mm, width more than 65 mm in the larger specimen, GSJ F18093). narrow and high dorsal fold, and numerous fine, often bifurcated and weakly fasciculated costae (numbering 10–12 in 10 mm at mid-length) on the dorsal valve.

  • Gypospirifer volatilis Duan and Li (1985, p. 127, 207, pl. 48, figs. 1, 2; pl. 49, figs. 1, 2), from the Zhesi (Jisu) Formation of Zhesi, Inner Mongolia, northern China, differs from G. kobiyamai in having a much broader and higher fold on the dorsal valve.

  • Gypospirifer gryphus Cooper and Grant (1976, p. 2211, pl. 591, figs. 1–5). from the Graham Formation of western Texas, differs from G. kobiyamai in its more transverse outline.

  • Distribution.—Wordian—Wuchiapingian: northeastern China (Heilongjiang), Far Eastern Russia (South Primorye), northeastern Japan (Kesennuma and Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt), central Japan (Moribu in the Hida Gaien Belt) and southwestern Japan (Mizukoshi, central Kyushu, western extension of the Hida Gaien Belt).

  • Family Spiriferellidae Waterhouse, 1968a Genus Alispiriferella Waterhouse and Waddington, 1982

  • Type species.—Spirifer (Spiriferella) keilhavii (von Buch) var. ordinaria Einor in Licharew and Einor, 1939.

  • Alispiriferella sp.
    Figure 6.10

  • Material.—One specimen, internal mould of a ventral valve, with external mould of the ventral interarea, GSJ F18094.

  • Remarks.—The material available is lacking external ornament of the ventral valve, but it resembles well the specimens of Alispiriferella lita (Fredericks, 1924b), described and figured by Tazawa (2008c, p. 55, figs. 9.8– 9.14) from the Mizukoshi Formation of Mizukoshi, central Kyushu, southwestern Japan. It is characterized by its large, transverse shell (length more than 30 mm, width more than 35 mm) and in having a pair of high dental plates and a deeply impressed heart-shaped muscle field in the ventral valve. The Takakurayama specimen may be an Alispiriferella species, although specific identification is difficult.

  • Superfamily Paeckelmanelloidea Ivanova, 1972
    Family Strophopleuridae Carter, 1974
    Subfamily Pterospiriferinae Waterhouse, 1975
    Genus Pterospirifer Dunbar, 1955

  • Type species.—Spirifer alatus von Schlotheim, 1813.

  • Pterospirifer alatus (von Schlotheim, 1813)
    Figures 6.11, 6.12

  • Spirifer alatus von Schlotheim, 1813, p. 87, pl. 16, figs. 1–7.

  • Pterospirifer alatus (von Schlotheim). Dunbar, 1955, p. 129, pl. 22, figs. 19–25; Ivanova, 1981, p. 33, pl. 1, figs. 1–3; pl. 2, fig. 1; text-figs. 1, 2b, 4a, 5, 10; Nakamura et al., 1992, pl. 5, figs. 1–3.

  • Material.—Two specimens: (1) external mould of a ventral valve. GSJ F18095; (2) external mould of a dorsal valve. GSJ F18096.

  • Remarks.—The Takakurayama specimens are fragmentarily preserved, but they can be referred to Pterospirifer alatus (von Schlotheim, 1813), from the lower Zechstein of Germany, in their large, transverse shells (length about 25 mm, width more than 57 mm in the better preserved dorsal valve specimen, GSJ F18096), with strongly alate cardinal extremities, broad, moderately high and smooth dorsal fold, numerous simple costae and microornament consisting of numerous very fine capillae and growth lamellae (Figure 6.11c) on both the ventral and dorsal valves.

  • Pterospirifer terechovi Zavodowsky (1968. p. 150. pl. 43. fig. 1). from the lower Permian of Kolyma, northeastern Russia, differs from P. alatus in its much larger size.

  • Distribution.—Capitanian—Wuchiapingian: eastern Greenland, Spitsbergen, Germany and northeastern Japan (Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt).

  • Order Terebratulida Waagen, 1883
    Suborder Terebratulidina Waagen, 1883
    Superfamily Dielasmatoidea Schuchert, 1913
    Family Dielasmatidae Schuchert, 1913
    Subfamily Dielasmatinae Schuchert, 1913
    Genus Dielasma King, 1859

  • Type species.—Terebratulites elongains von Schlotheim, 1816.

  • Dielasma sp.
    Figure 6.13

  • Material.—Two specimens, internal moulds of two ventral valves, GSJ F18097, 18098.

  • Remarks.—These specimens are safely assigned to the genus Dielasma by their medium size (length 17 mm, width 14 mm in the better preserved specimen, GSJ F18097), elongate, subpentagonal outline of the shell and gently convex dorsal valve with a shallow sulcus and a pair of strong dental plates. The Takakurayama species resembles well and may be identical with Dielasma sp., described by Tazawa (2008c, p. 57, figs. 9.15–9.18) from the upper part of the Mizukoshi Formation of Mizukoshi, central Kyushu, southwest Japan, in size and outline of the dorsal valve, but accurate comparison is difficult because of the poor preservation of the present material.

  • Acknowledgements

    Sincere thanks are due to Kazuo Hashimoto (Iwaki City, Fukushima Prefecture) for his help in the field; and two reviewers, Shen Shuzhong (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing) and G. R. Shi (School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne) for their critical review of the manuscript by which this paper is greatly improved.

    References

    1.

    N. W. Archbold , 1999: Additional records of Permian brachiopods from near Rat Buri, Thailand. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria , vol. 111, p. 71–86. Google Scholar

    2.

    K. Asama , 1974: Permian plants from Takakurayama, Japan. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo , vol. 17, p. 239–252. Google Scholar

    3.

    A. J. Boucot , J. G. Johnson and R. D. Staton , 1964: On some atrypoid, retzioid, and athyridoid Brachiopoda. Journal of Paleontology , vol. 38, p. 805–822. Google Scholar

    4.

    H. G. Bronn , 1862: Die Klassen und Ordnungen der Weichthiere, Wissenschaftlich Dargestellt in Wort und Bild, 3. Bd. 1. Abtheilung, Kopflose Thiere (Malacozoa Acephala), 518 p. C. F. Winter'sche Verlagshandlung, Leipzig and Heidelberg. Google Scholar

    5.

    J. L. Carter , 1974: New genera of spiriferid and brachythyrid brachiopods. Journal of Paleontology , vol. 48, p. 674–696. Google Scholar

    6.

    Y. T. Chao , 1927: Productidae of China, Part 1. Producti. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series B , vol. 5, p. 1–244. Google Scholar

    7.

    Z.-Q. Chen , M. Campi , G. R. Shi and K. Kaiho , 2005: Post-extinction brachiopod faunas from the Late Permian Wuchiapingian coal series of South China. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica , vol. 50, p. 343–363. Google Scholar

    8.

    T. T. Chi-Thuan , 1962: Les brachiopodes permiens de Cam-Lo (Province de Quang-Tri). Annales de la Faculté des Sciences, Université de Saigon , 1962, p. 485–498. Google Scholar

    9.

    M. M. Colani , 1919: Sur quelques fossiles ouralo-permiens de Hongay. Bulletin du Service Géologique de l'Indochine , vol. 6, p. 1– 27 .  Google Scholar

    10.

    G. A. Cooper , 1957: Permian brachiopods from central Oregon. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections , vol. 134, p. 1–79. Google Scholar

    11.

    G. A. Cooper and R. E. Grant , 1975: Permian brachiopods of West Texas, 3. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, no. 19, p. 795–1921. Google Scholar

    12.

    G. A. Cooper and R. E. Grant , 1976: Permian brachiopods of West Texas, 4. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, no. 21, p. 1923–2607. Google Scholar

    13.

    A. S. Dagys , 1972: Morfologiya i sistema mezozoyskikh rettsioidnykh brakhiopod (Morphology and systematics of Mesozoic retzioid brachiopods). Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Sibirskoye Otdeleniye, Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki, vol. 112, p. 94–105. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    14.

    T. Davidson , 1862: On some Carboniferous Brachiopoda, collected in India by A. Fleming, M. D., and W. Purdon, Esq., F. G. S. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London , vol. 18, p. 25– 35. Google Scholar

    15.

    C. Diener , 1897: The Permocarboniferous fauna of Chitichun, No. 1. Palaeontologia Indica, Series 15 , vol. 1, p. 1–105. Google Scholar

    16.

    C. Diener , 1899: Anthracolithic fossils of Kashmir and Spiti. Palaeontologia Indica, Series 15 , vol. 1, p. 1–95. Google Scholar

    17.

    P. Ding and W. Qi , 1983: Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Xian Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed., Palaeontological Atlas of Northwest China; Shaanxi, Gansu and Ninxia Volume, Part 2. Upper Palaeozoic, p. 244–425. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English titleGoogle Scholar

    18.

    C. Duan and W. Li , 1985: Description of fossils, (4) Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Y. Ding , G. Xia , C. Duan , W. Li , X. Liu and Z. Liang , Study on the Early Permian stratigraphy and fauna in Zhesi district, Nei Mongol Zizhiqu (Inner Mongolia). Bulletin of the Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, no. 10, p. 99– 145, 199–214. (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    19.

    C. O. Dunbar , 1955: Permian brachiopod faunas of Central East Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland , vol. 110, p. 1–169. Google Scholar

    20.

    M. Ehiro , 2008: Two genera of Popanoceratidae (Permian Ammonoidea) from the South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan, with a note on the age of the Takakurayama Formation in the Abukuma Massif. Bulletin of the Tohoku University Museum, no. 8, p. 1–8. Google Scholar

    21.

    M. Ehiro and K. Okami , 1989: Permian; Yaguki area. In, Editorial Committee of Tohoku, Part 2 of Regional Geology of Japan ed., Regional Geology of Japan, Part 2 Tohoku, p. 58–60. Kyoritsu Shuppan, Tokyo, (in Japanese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    22.

    R. Endo and E. Matsumoto , 1962: Permo—Carboniferous trilobites from Japan. Science Reports of Saitama University, Series B , vol. 4, p. 149–172. Google Scholar

    23.

    R. Feng and Z. Jiang , 1978: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Geological and Palaeontological Team of Guizhou ed., Palaeontological Atlas of Southwest China; Guizhou, Part 2. Carboniferous to Quaternary Volume, p. 231–305. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    24.

    L. Ferguson , 1969: Possible brood pouches and sexual dimorphism in the productid brachiopod Megousia Muir-Wood and Cooper. In, G. E. G. Westermann ed., Sexual Dimorphism in Fossil Metazoa and Taxonomic Implications, p. 37–50. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart. Google Scholar

    25.

    G Fredericks , 1924a: Paleontologicheskie ztoudy, 2. O verkhnekamennougolnykh spiriferidakh Urala (Paleontological studies, 2. On Upper Carboniferous spiriferids from the Urals). Izvestiya Geologicheskogo Komiteta , vol. 38, p. 295–324. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    26.

    G Fredericks , 1924b: Ussuriyskiy verkhniy paleozoy, 1. Brachiopoda (Upper Paleozoic of the Ussuriland, 1. Brachiopoda). Materialy po Geologii i Poleznym Iskopaemym Dalnego Vostoka, no. 28, p. 1–52. (in Russian with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    27.

    G. Fredericks , 1925: Ussuriyskiy verkhniy paleozoy, 2. Permskie brakhiopody s mysa Kaluzina (Upper Palaeozoicum of Oussouriland, 2. Permian Brachiopoda of Cape Kalouzin). Materialy po Geologii i Poleznym Iskopaemym Dal'nego Vostoka, no. 40, p. 1– 28. (in Russian with English titleGoogle Scholar

    28.

    G. Fredericks , 1926: Materialy k faune peschano-glinistoy tolschi s r. Kezhim-Terovey (Materials for the study of the fauna from sandstoneargillite sequence in the Kejim-Terovey River). Izvestiya Geologicheskogo Komiteta , vol. 45, p. 81–91. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    29.

    M. Fujikawa and C. Suzuki , 2011: Early Permian ammonoids from the Takakurayama area, Abukuma Mountains, northeast Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 26, p. 61– 72. Google Scholar

    30.

    A. W. Grabau , 1936: Early Permian fossils of China, Part 2. Fauna of the Maping Limestone of Kwangsi and Kweichow. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series B , vol. 8, p. 1–441. Google Scholar

    31.

    R. E. Grant , 1976: Permian brachiopods from southern Thailand. Paleontological Society Memoir, no. 9, p. 1–269. Google Scholar

    32.

    T. A. Grunt , 1986: Sistema brakhiopod otryada Atiridida (Classification of brachiopods of the order Athyridida). Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta , vol. 215, p. 1–200. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    33.

    J. Hall and J. M. Clarke , 1893: An Introduction to the Study of the Genera of Palaeozoic Brachiopoda, Palaeontology of New York, Vol. 8, Part 2, 317 p. Charles van Benthuysen & Sons, Albany. Google Scholar

    34.

    I. Hayasaka , 1957: Two Permian nautiloids from Takakura-yama near Yotsukura-machi, Fukushima Prefecture (Abukuma Plateau region), Japan. Science Reports of the Yokohama National University, Section 2, no. 6, p. 21–30. Google Scholar

    35.

    I. Hayasaka , 1960: On the occurrence of Neospirifer fasciger (Keyserling) in Japan, and a note on some associate Permian brachiopods from around Kesen-numa City, northeast Japan. In, Shimane University ed., Collection of Essays in Commemoration of the Tenth Anniversary (1959) of Shimane University (Natural Science), p. 34–57. Shimane University, Matsue. Google Scholar

    36.

    I. Hayasaka , 1965: Some cephalopods in the Permian faunule of Takakura-yama, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan (with a note on the geology of the district, by Ichiro Yanagisawa and Mamoru Nemoto). Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, no. 57, p. 8–27. Google Scholar

    37.

    T. K. Huang , 1932: Late Permian Brachiopoda of southwestern China, Palaeontologia Sinica, Series B, vol. 9, fasc. 1, p. 139. Google Scholar

    38.

    T. K. Huang , 1933: Late Permian Brachiopoda of southwestern China, Pt. 2. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series B, fasc. 2, vol. 9, p. 1–131. Google Scholar

    39.

    V. V. Ifanova , 1972: Permian brachiopods of the Pechora basin. In, V. V. Ifanova and E. G. Semenova , Middle Carboniferous and Permian brachiopodsfrom east and north of the European part of the USSR, p. 72–161. Nauka, Moskva, (in Russian with English titleGoogle Scholar

    40.

    E. A. Ivanova , 1972: Osnovnye zakonomernosti evolyutsii spiriferid (Brachiopoda) [Main features of spiriferid evolution (Brachiopoda)]. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1972, no. 3, p. 28–42. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    41.

    E. A. Ivanova , 1981: Morfologiya i Razvitie Brakhiopod (Nadsemeystvo Paeckelmanellacea) [Morphology and Development of Brachiopods (Superfamily Paeckelmannellacea)], 55 p. Nauka, Moskva, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    42.

    Y. Jin , 1985: Permian Brachiopoda and palaeogeography of the Qing-hai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau. Palaeontologia Cathayana, no. 2, p. 19–71. Google Scholar

    43.

    Y. Jin and D. Sun , 1981: Palaeozoic brachiopods from Xizang. In, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology ed., Palaeontology of Xizang, Book 3, The Series of the Scientific Expedition to the Oinghai—Xizang Plateau, p. 127–171. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    44.

    N. V. Kalashnikov , 1983: Brakhiopody. In, S. V. Meyen ed., Paleontologicheskiy Atlas Permskikh Otlozheniy Pechorskogo Ugol'nogo Basseyna (Palaeontological Atlas of the Permian Deposits of the Pechora Coal Basin), p. 203–211. Nauka, Leningrad, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    45.

    N. V. Kalashnikov , 1993: Brakhiopody Permi Evropeyskogo Severa Rossii, 113 p. Nauka, Sankt-Peterburg. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    46.

    H. Kano , 1971: Studies on the Usuginu conglomerates in the Kitakami Mountains—Studies on the granite-bearing conglomerates in Japan, no. 22—. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 77, p. 415–440. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    47.

    E. Kayser , 1883: Obercarbonische Fauna von Lo-ping. In, F. F. von Richthofen ed., China, Bd. 4, p. 160–208. Dietrich Reimer, Berlin. Google Scholar

    48.

    A. Keyserling , 1846: Geognostische Beobachtungen, 1. Paläontologische Bemerkungen. In, P. von Krusenstern and A. Keyserling eds., Wissenschaftliche Beobachtungen auf einer Reise in das Petschora-Land im Jahre 1843, p. 151–406. Carl Kray, St. Petersburg. Google Scholar

    49.

    R. E. King , 1931: The geology of the Glass Mountains, Texas, Part 2. Faunal summary and correlation of the Permian formations with description of Brachiopoda. University of Texas Bulletin, no. 3042, p. 1–245. Google Scholar

    50.

    W. King , 1846: Remarks on certain genera belonging to the class Palliobranchiata. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 1 , vol. 18. p. 26–42 and p. 83–94. Google Scholar

    51.

    W. King , 1859: On Gwynia, Dielasma, and Macandrevia, three new genera of Palliobranchiata Mollusca, one of which has been dredged in the Strangford Lough. Proceedings of Dublin University, Zoological and Botanical Association, vol.1, P. 256–262. Google Scholar

    52.

    A. G. Klets , 2005: Upper Paleozoic of Marginal Seas of Angarida, 239 p. Akademicheskoe Izdatelstvo “Geo”, Novosibirsk, (in Russian with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    53.

    A. G. Klets I. V. Budnikov , R. V. Kutygin and V. S. Grinenko , 2001: The reference section of the Lower-Upper Permian boundary beds in the Verkhoyansk region and its correlation. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation , vol. 9, p. 247–262. Google Scholar

    54.

    T. Kobayashi and T. Hamada , 1984: Permian trilobites of Japan in comparison with Asian, Pacific and other faunas. Palaeontological Society of Japan, Special Papers, no. 26, p. 1–92. Google Scholar

    55.

    M. Kobiyama , 1956: On the age of the Takakurayama Formation. Bulletin of the Taira Chigaku Dokokai, no. 3, p. 7–10. (in Japanese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    56.

    H. Koizumi, 1972: New genera of trilobite family Phillipsidae from the Takakurayama Group (Permian), Abukuma Massif in Japan.Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), vol. 26. p. 19–25. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    57.

    H. Koizumi , 1974: New genera of trilobite from the Takakurayama Group. Bulletin of the Taira Chigaku Dokokai, no. 12, p. 12–14. (in Japanese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    58.

    H. Koizumi , 1979: Permian brachiopods from Takakura-yama Formation and its geological age, N. E. Japan. Bulletin of the Taira Chigaku Dokokai, Special Volume, p.1–3. (in Japanese with English titleGoogle Scholar

    59.

    G. V. Kotlyar , 1961: Rod Yakovlevia Fredericks (Genus Yakovlevia Fredericks). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR , vol. 140, p. 459–461. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    60.

    G. V. Kotlyar , 1989: Paleontological description: Brachiopods. In, G. V. Kotlyar and Yu. D. Zakharov eds., Evolution of the Latest Permian Biota: Midian Regional Stage in the USSR, p. 117–125. Nauka, Leningrad, (in Russian with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    61.

    M. V. Kulikov , 1974: Brakhiopody kungurskogo yarusa Urala (Algae, Brachiopods and Miospores from the Permian Deposits of the Western Urals). In, G. N. Papulov and B. I. Chuvashov eds., Vodorosli Brakhiopody i Miospory iz Permskikh Otlozheniy Zapadnogo Urala, p. 77–123. Uralskiy Nauchyy Tsentr Akademii Nauk SSSR, Sverdlovsk, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    62.

    L. Lee and F. Gu , 1976: Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Geological Bureau of Nei Mongol and Geological Institute of Northeast Chia eds., Palaeontological Atlas of Northeast China; Nei Mongol, Part 1. Palaeozoic Volume, p. 228–306. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    63.

    L. Lee , F. Gu and Y. Su , 1980: Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Shenyang Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed., Palaeontological Atlas of Northeast China, Part 1. Palaeozoic Volume, p. 327–428. Geological Publishing House, Beijing. (in Chinese with English titleGoogle Scholar

    64.

    M. S. Leman , 1994: The significance of Upper Permian brachiopods from Merapoh area, northwest Pahang. Geological Society of Malaysia, Bulletin , vol. 35, p. 113–121. Google Scholar

    65.

    Z.-T. Liao , 1980: Upper Permian brachiopods from western Guizhou. In, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology ed., Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of the Upper Permian Coal-bearing Formation in Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan, p. 241–277. Science Press, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    66.

    B. K. Licharew and O. L. Einor , 1939: Paleontologiya Sovetskoy Arktiki Vipusk 4 (Palaeontology of the Soviet Arctic, Part 4). Trudy Arkticheskogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Instituta , vol. 127, p. 1–245. (in Russian with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    67.

    B. K. Licharew and G. V. Kotlyar , 1978: Permskie brakhiopody Yuzhnogo Primorya. In, L. I. Popeko ed., Verkhniy Paleozoy Severo-Vostochnoy Azii (Upper Palaeozoic of Northeast Asia), p. 63–75. Dal'nevostochnyy Nauchnyy Tsentr Akademii Nauk SSSR (DVNTS AN SSSR), Vladivostok, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    68.

    Z. Liu , Z. Tan and Y. Ding , 1982: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Geological Bureau of Hunan ed., Palaeontological Atlas of Hunan, p. 172–216. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    69.

    I. N. Manankov , 1991: Systematical part: Family Yakovleviidae. In, L. P. Tatarinov , B. Luvsandansan , G. A. Afanasjeva , R. Barsbold , I. P. Morozova , L. I. Novitskaya , A. P. Rasnitsyn , V. Yu. Reschetov , A. Yu. Posanov , V. A. Sysoev and B. A. Trofimov eds., Permian Invertebrates of Southern Mongolia, p. 106–108. Nauka, Moskva, (in Russian with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    70.

    H. Mansuy , 1913: Faunes des Calcaires à Productus de l'Indochine, Première Série. Mémoires du Service Géologique de l'Indochine , vol. 2, p. 1–133. Google Scholar

    71.

    J. Marcou , 1858: Geology of North America, with Two Reports on the Prairies of Arkansas and Texas, the Rocky Mountains of New Mexico and the Sierra Nevada of California, 144 p. Zürcher und Furrer, Zürich. Google Scholar

    72.

    M. Minato , M. Hunahashi , J. Watanabe and M. Kato , 1979: Variscan Geohistory of Northern Japan: The Abean Orogeny, 207 p. Tokai University Press, Tokyo. Google Scholar

    73.

    M. G. Mironova , 1964: K poznaniyu rannepermskikh brakhiopod Pechorskogo basseyna (Early Permian brachiopods of the Pechora Basin). Voprosy Paleontogii , vol. 4, p. 85–99. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    74.

    H. M. Muir-Wood , 1955: A History of the Classification of the Phylum Brachiopoda, 124 p. British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    75.

    H. M. Muir-Wood , 1962: On the Morphology and Classification of the Brachiopod Suborder Chonetoidea, 132 p. British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    76.

    H. M. Muir-Wood and G. A. Cooper , 1960: Morphology, Classification and Life Habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda). Geological Society of America Memoir, 81, 447 p. Geological Society of America, New York. Google Scholar

    77.

    K. Nakamura , 1972: Anidanthus and Megousia (Brachiopoda) from the Permian of Japan and Cambodia. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Series 4 , vol. 15, p. 427–445. Google Scholar

    78.

    K. Nakamura , J. Tazawa and F. Kumon , 1992: Permian brachiopods of the Kapp Starostin Formation, West Spitsbergen. In, K. Nakamura ed., Investigations on the Upper Carboniferous-Upper Permian Succession of West Spitsbergen 1989–1991, p. 77–95. Publication of Hokkaido University, Sapporo. Google Scholar

    79.

    K. Nakazawa and N. D. Newell , 1968: Permian bivalves of Japan. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Series B , vol. 35. p. 1–108. Google Scholar

    80.

    J. G. Norwood and H. Pratten , 1855: Notice of the genus Chonetes, as found in the Western states and territories with descriptions of eleven new species. Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences Journal, New Series , vol. 3, p. 23–32. Google Scholar

    81.

    Y. Onuki , 1966: Stratigraphy and structural geology of the Palaeozoic formations in the Yaguki and Takakurayama districts, Abukuma Massif, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Professor Susumu Matsushita Memorial Volume, p. 41–52. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    82.

    Y. Onuki , 1969: Geology of the Kitakami Massif, northeast Japan. Contributions from the Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Tohoku University, no. 69, p. 1–239. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    83.

    V. I. Poletaev , 1997: The revision of genus Neospirifer Fredericks, 1924 and new genus Lutuginia of subfamily Neospiriferinae. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1997, no. 3, p. 54–63. ( in Russian with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    84.

    W. H. C. Ramsbottom , 1952: The fauna of the Cefn Coed marine band in the Coal Measures at Aberbaiden, near Tondu, Glamorgan. Bulletin of the Great Britain Geological Survey, Palaeontology , vol. 4, p. 8–32. Google Scholar

    85.

    F. R. C. Reed , 1944: Brachiopoda and Mollusca from the Productus Limestones of the Salt Range. P alaeontologia Indica, New Series , vol. 23. p. 1–678. Google Scholar

    86.

    T. G. Sarytcheva , B. K. Licharew and A. N. Sokolskaya , 1960: Otryad Productida. In, T. G. Sarytcheva ed., Osnovy Paleóntologa, Volume 7. Mshanki, Brakhiopody: Pripozhenie—Foronidy (Basic Palaeontology, Volume 7. Bryozoa, Brachiopoda, with Phoronida), p. 221–238, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Moskva, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    87.

    T. G. Sarytcheva and A. N. Sokolskaya , 1959: O klassifikatsii lozhnoporistykh brakhiopod (On the classification of pseudopunctate brachiopods). Doklady, Akademii Nauk SSSR , vol. 125, p. 181– 184. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    88.

    T. G. Sarytcheva and A. N. Sokolskaya , 1965: Otryad Productida. In, V. E. Ruzhentsev and T. G. Sarytcheva eds., Razvitie i Smena Morskikh Organizmov na Rubezhe Paleozoya i Mezozoya (The Development and Change of Marine Organisms at the Palaeozoic— Mesozoic Boundary), p. 209–232. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 108, Nauka, Moskva, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    89.

    E. F. von Schlotheim , 1813: Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen in geognostischer Hinsicht. In, C. C. Leonhard ed., Taschenbuch für die Gesammte Mineralogie mit Hinsicht auf die Neuesten Entdeckungen, 7. Jahrg., 1. Abth., p. 1–134. Hermannsche Buchhandlung, Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar

    90.

    E. F. von Schlotheim , 1816: Beitrage zur Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen in geognostischer Hinsicht. Denkschriften der Bayerischen Academie der Wissenschaften , vol. 6, p. 13–36. Google Scholar

    91.

    C. Schuchert , 1893: Classification of the Brachiopoda. American Geologist, vol. 11, P. 141–167. Google Scholar

    92.

    C. Schuchert , 1913: Class 2. Brachiopoda. In, K. A. von Zittel , Textbook of Palaeontology, Volume 1, Part 1, 2nd Edition, p. 355–420. Macmillan, London. Google Scholar

    93.

    C. Schuchert , 1929: Cassification of brachiopod genera, fossil and recent. In, C. Schuchert and C. M. Le Vene , Animalia Pars 42, Fossilium Catalogus, Volume 1, p. 10–25. W. Junk, Berlin. Google Scholar

    94.

    S.-Z. Shen , N. W. Archbold , G. R. Shi and Z.-Q. Chen , 2000: Permian brachiopods from the Selong Xishan section, Xizang (Tibet), China, Part 1: Stratigraphy, Strophomenida, Productida and Rhynchonellida. Geobios , vol. 33, p. 725–752. Google Scholar

    95.

    S.-Z. Shen and M. E. Clapham , 2009: Wuchiapingian (Lopingian. Late Permian) brachiopods from the Episkopi Formation of Hydra Island, Greece. Palaeontology , vol. 52, p. 713–743. Google Scholar

    96.

    S.-Z. Shen and G. R. Shi , 2009: Latest Guadalupian brachiopods from the Guadalupian/Lopingian boundary GSSP section at Penglaitan in Labin, Guangxi, South China and implications for the timing of the pre-Lopingian crisis. Palaeoworld , vol. 18, p. 152–161. Google Scholar

    97.

    S.-Z. Shen , G. R. Shi and Z. Fang , 2002: Permian brachiopods from Baoshan and Simao blocks in western Yunnan, China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences , vol. 20, p. 665–682. Google Scholar

    98.

    S.-Z. Shen , J.-F. Xie , H. Zhang and G. R. Shi , 2009: Roadian—Wordian (Guadalupian, Middle Permian) global palaeobiogeography of brachiopods. Global and Planetary Change , vol. 65, p. 166–181. Google Scholar

    99.

    S.-Z. Shen and Y.-C. Zhang , 2008: Earliest Wuchiapingian (Lopingian, Late Permian) brachiopods in southern Hunan, South China: Implications for the pre-Lopingian crisis and onset of Lopingian recovery/radiation. Journal of Paleontology , vol. 82, p. 924–937. Google Scholar

    100.

    G. R. Shi , 2006: The marine Permian of East and Northeast Asia: an overview of biostratigraphy, palaeobiogeography and palaeogeographical implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences , vol. 26, p. 175–206. Google Scholar

    101.

    G. R. Shi and J. Tazawa , 2001: Rhynchopora and Blasispirifer (Brachiopoda) from the Middle Permian of the Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan, and their paleobiogeographical significance. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 107, p. 755–761. Google Scholar

    102.

    D. Shimizu , 1961: Brachiopod fossils from the Perman Maizuru Group. Memoirs of the College of Science, University of Kyoto, Series B , vol. 27, p. 309–351. Google Scholar

    103.

    R. V. Solomina , 1960: Nekotorye permskie brakhiopody Pay-Khoya (Some Permian brachiopods of Pai-Khoi). Sbornik Statey po Paleontologa i Biostratigrafii, no. 19, p. 24–73. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    104.

    F. G. Stehli , 1954: Lower Leonardian Brachiopoda of the Sierra Diablo. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History , vol. 105, p. 262–358. Google Scholar

    105.

    J. Tazawa , 1975: Uppermost Permian fossils from the southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, vol. 81, p 629–640. Google Scholar

    106.

    J. Tazawa , 1991: Middle Permian brachiopod biogeography of Japan and adjacent regions in East Asia. In, K. Ishii , X. Liu , K. Ichikawa and B. Huang eds., Pre-Jurassic Geology of Inner Mongolia, China—Report of China—Japan Cooperative Research Group, 1987–1989—, p. 213–230. Matsuya Insatsu, Osaka. Google Scholar

    107.

    J. Tazawa , 1998: Pre-Neogene tectonic divisions and Middle Permian brachiopod faunal provinces of Japan. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria , vol. 110, p. 281–288. Google Scholar

    108.

    J. Tazawa , 1999a: Occurrence of the Boreal-type brachiopod Yakovlevia from the Middle Permian of the Hida Gaien and South Kitakami belts, Japan and its tectonic implications. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 105, p. 227–230. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    109.

    J. Tazawa , 1999b: Boreal-type brachiopod Yakovlevia from the Middle Permian of Japan. Paleontological Research , vol. 3, p. 88–94. Google Scholar

    110.

    J. Tazawa , 2001: Middle Permian brachiopods from the Moribu area, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan. Paleontological Research , vol. 5, p. 283–310. Google Scholar

    111.

    J. Tazawa , 2002: Late Paleozoic brachiopod faunas of the South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan, and their paleobiogeographic and tectonic implications. Island Arc , vol. 11, p. 287–301. Google Scholar

    112.

    J. Tazawa , 2007: Middle Permian brachiopod faunas of Japan and their significance for understanding the Palaeozoic—Mesozoic tectonics of the Japanese Islands. In, Th. E. Wong ed., Proceedings of the 15 th International Congress on Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 10–16 August 2003, p. 565–573, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam. Google Scholar

    113.

    J. Tazawa , 2008a: Lamnimargus (Productida, Brachiopoda) from the Upper Permian of Ofunato in the South Kitakami Belt, NE Japan, and its palaeobiogeographical significance. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 23, p. 1–11. Google Scholar

    114.

    J. Tazawa , 2008b: Brachiopods from the Upper Permian Takakurayama Formation, Abukuma Mountains, northeast Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 23, p. 13– 53. Google Scholar

    115.

    J. Tazawa , 2008c: Permian brachiopods from the Mizukoshi Formation, central Kyushu, SW Japan: Systematics, palaeobiogeography and tectonic implications. Paleontological Research, vol. 12, p. 37–61. Google Scholar

    116.

    J. Tazawa , 2009: Brachiopods from the Upper Permian Tsunemori Formation of the Akiyoshi area, southwest Japan, and their tectonic implications. Paleontological Research , vol. 13, p. 65–78. Google Scholar

    117.

    J. Tazawa , 2011: Late Permian (Wuchiapingian) brachiopod fauna from Okutadami, central Japan: Systematics, palaeobiogeography and tectonic implications. Paleontological Research , vol. 15, p. 168–180. Google Scholar

    118.

    J. Tazawa , 2012: Late Permian (Changhsingian) brachiopod fauna from Nabekoshiyama in the Kesennuma area, South Kitakami Belt northeast Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 27, p. 15–50. Google Scholar

    119.

    J. Tazawa and H. Araki , 2013: Four brachiopod species newly described from the Middle Permian of Kesennuma, South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 28, p. 1–14. Google Scholar

    120.

    J. Tazawa , M. Fujikawa , D. Zakharov, Yu and S. Hasegawa , 2005: Middle Permian ammonoids from the Takakurayama area, Abukuma Mountains, northeast Japan and their stratigraphical significance. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 20. p. 15–27. Google Scholar

    121.

    J. Tazawa and S. Hasegawa , 2007: Anidanthus, Gypospirifer and Alispiriferella (Brachiopoda) from the Upper Permian Mizukoshi Formation, central Kyushu, SW Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 22, p. 1–14. Google Scholar

    122.

    J. Tazawa and Y. Ibaraki , 2001: Middle Permian brachiopods from Setamai, the type locality of the Kanokura Formation, southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University, Series E, no. 16, p. 1–33. Google Scholar

    123.

    J. Tazawa and T. Matsumoto , 1998: Middle Permian brachiopods from the Oguradani Formation, Ise district, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University, Series E, no. 13, p. 1–19. Google Scholar

    124.

    J. Tazawa and Y. Miyake , 2011: Late Permian (Changhsingian) brachiopod fauna from Maeda in the Ofunato area. South Kitakami Belt, NE Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 26, p. 1–22. Google Scholar

    125.

    J. Tazawa and Niigata Pre-Tertiary Research Group, 1999: Permian brachiopods from the Okutadami area, near the boundary between Niigata and Fukushima Prefectures, central Japan and their tectonic implications. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 105, p. 729–732. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    126.

    J. Tazawa , F. Takizawa and K. Kamada , 2000: A Middle Permian Boreal-Tethyan mixed brachiopod fauna from Yakejima, southern Kitakami Mountains, NE Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University, Series E, no. 15, p. 1–21. Google Scholar

    127.

    Z. Tong , 1978: Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Geological Institute of Southwest China ed., Palaeontological Atlas of Southwest China; Sichuan, Part 2. Carboniferous to Mesozoic, p. 210–267. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    128.

    K. Ueno , 1992: Permian foraminifers from the Takakurayama Group of the southern Abukuma Mountains, northeast Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, no. 168, p. 1265–1295. Google Scholar

    129.

    V. I. Ustritsky , 1963: Description of the fauna; Phylum Brachiopoda and Mollusca. In, V. I. Ustritsky et al., Permian Stratigraphy and Fauna of the Beishan Area, Western Gansu (Permian Stratigraphy and Fauna of the Beishan Area, Western Gansu), p. 6–36. China Industry Press, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    130.

    W. Waagen , 1883–1884: Salt Range fossils, 1. Productus-Limestone fossils: Brachiopoda. Palaeontologia Indica, Series 13, vol. 1, p. 391–546 (1883) and p. 547–728 (1884). Google Scholar

    131.

    C. Wang and S. Zhang , 2003: Zhesi Brachiopod Fauna, 210 p. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    132.

    G. Wang , Q. Liu , Y. Jin , S. Hu , W. Liang and Z. Liao , 1982: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed., Palaeontological Atlas of East China, Part 2. Late Palaeozoic Volume, p. 186–256, Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in ChineseGoogle Scholar

    133.

    Y. Wang , Y. Jin and D. Fang , 1964: Brachiopod Fossils of China, Vols. 1 and 2, p. 1–354 and p. 355–777. Science Press, Beijing. (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    134.

    J. B. Waterhouse , 1968a: The classification and descriptions of Permian Spiriferida (Brachiopoda) from New Zealand. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A , vol. 129, p. 1–94. Google Scholar

    135.

    J. B. Waterhouse , 1968b: New species of Megousia Muir-Wood and Cooper and allied new genus from the Permian of Australia and North America. Journal of Paleontology , vol. 42, p. 1171–1185. Google Scholar

    136.

    J. B. Waterhouse , 1975: New Permian and Triassic brachiopod taxa. University of Queensland Papers, Department of Geology , vol. 7, p. 1–23. Google Scholar

    137.

    J. B. Waterhouse , 1978: Permian Brachiopoda and Mollusca from north-west Nepal. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A , vol. 160, p. 1–175. Google Scholar

    138.

    J. B. Waterhouse , 1983: New Permian invertebrate genera from the east Australian segment of Gondwana. Bulletin of the Indian Geologists Association , vol. 16, p. 153–158. Google Scholar

    139.

    J. B. Waterhouse , 1986: Late Palaeozoic Scyphozoa and Brachiopoda (Inarticulata, Strophomenida, Productida and Rhynchonellida) from the southeast Bowen Basin, Australia. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A , vol. 193, p. 1–76. Google Scholar

    140.

    J. B. Waterhouse. , D. J. C. Briggs and S. M. Parfrey. , 1983: Major faunal assemblages in the Early Permian Tiverton Formation near Homevale Homestead, northern Bowen Basin, Queensland. In, C. Foster ed., Permian Geology of Queensland, p. 121–138. Geological Society of Australia, Queensland Division, Brisbane. Google Scholar

    141.

    J. B. Waterhouse and S. Piyasin , 1970: Mid-Permian brachiopods from Khao Phrik, Thailand. P alaeontographica, Abteilung A , vol. 135, p. 83–197. Google Scholar

    142.

    J. B. Waterhouse and J. Waddington , 1982: Systematic descriptions, paleoecology and correlations of the Late Paleozoic subfamily Spiriferellinae (Brachiopoda) from the Yukon Territory and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, 73 p. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 289, Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa. Google Scholar

    143.

    J. Yanagida , 1963: Brachiopods from the Upper Permian Mizukoshi Formation, central Kyushu. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D , vol. 14, p. 69–78. Google Scholar

    144.

    J. Yanagida , 1970: Permian brachiopods from Khao Phrik, near Rat Buri, Thailand. Geology and Palaeontology of Southwest Asia , vol. 8, p. 69–96. Google Scholar

    145.

    J. Yanagida , 1996: Permian brachiopods from the Tsunemori Formation, SW Japan, and their paleobiogeographic implication. In, P. Copper and J. Jin eds., Brachiopods, p. 313–315. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam. Google Scholar

    146.

    J. Yanagida and N. Nakornsri , 1999: Permian brachiopods from Khao Hin Kling area near Phetchabun, north-central Thailand. Bulletin of the Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History, no. 18, p. 105–136. Google Scholar

    147.

    I. Yanagisawa , 1958: On a discovery of trilobite (Permian) from the Takakurayama Group, Abukuma Mountainland. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 64, 207 p. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    148.

    I. Yanagisawa , 1967: Geology and paleontology of the Takakurayama—Yaguki area, Yotsukura-cho, Fukushima Prefecture. Science Reports of the Tohoku University, 2nd Series , vol. 39, p.63–112. Google Scholar

    149.

    I. Yanagisawa and M. Nemoto , 1961: On the Paleozoic formations of the Takakura-yama district, Abukuma Mountainland. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 67, p. 274–283. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    150.

    D. Yang , 1984: Systematic descriptions of palaeontology: Brachiopoda. In, Yichang Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed., Biostratigraphy of the Yangtze Gorge Area, (3) Late Palaeozoic Era, p. 203–239, p. 330–333 and p. 387–396. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    151.

    D. Yang , S. Ni , M. Chang and R. Zhao , 1977: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Geological Institute of Hubei et al., eds., Palaeontological Atlas of SouthCentrai China, Part 2. Late Palaeozoic Volume, p. 303–470. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    152.

    S. Yang and Y. Fan , 1983: Carboniferous brachiopods from Xizang (Tibet) and their faunal provinces. In, CGQXP Editorial Committee, Ministry of Geology and Mineral Resources, PPC ed., Contribution to the Geology of the Qinghai—Xizang (Tibet) Plateau, Volume 11, p. 265–289. Geological Publishing House. Beijing, (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    153.

    K. Yoshida and H. Machiyama , 1997: The sedimentary environment of the Permian Daido Formation in the South Kitakami Terrane, northeast Japan. In, M. Kawamura , T. Oka and T. Kondo eds., Commemorative Volume for Professor Makoto Kato, p. 261–273. Nakanishi Insatsu, Sapporo, (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    154.

    K. Yoshida and H. Machiyama , 1998: Middle Permian coarse clastics in the western marginal area of the South Kitakami Terrane, northeast Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 104, p. 71–89. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    155.

    V. M. Zavodowsky , 1968: Otryad Spiriferida, nadsemeystvo Spiriferacea. In, B. L. Markovsky ed., Novye Vidy Drevnikh Rasteniy i Bespozvochnykh SSSR, Vypusk 2 (New Species of Ancient Plants and Invertebrates of the USSR), p. 149–160. Nedra, Moskva, (in Russian: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    156.

    V. M. Zavodowsky and D. L. Stepanov , 1970: Opisanie vidov; Tip Brachiopoda, klass Articulata. In, M. V. Kulikov ed., Polevoy Atlas Permskoy Fauny i Flory Severo-Vostoka SSSR (Field Atlas of the Pernmian Fauna and Flora of the Northeastern USSR), p. 72–182. Magadanskoe Knizhnoe Izdatelstvo, Magadan, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    157.

    Y. Zeng , X. He and M. Zhu , 1995: Permian Brachiopods and Community Succession in the Huayin Mountains, Sichuan, 187 p., China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou. (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    158.

    L.-P. Zhan , 1979: Descriptions of fossils; Brachiopoda. In, H.-F. Hou , L.-P. Zhan , B.-W. Chen and others. The Coal-bearing Strata and Fossils of Late Permian from Guangtung, p. 61–100. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English titleGoogle Scholar

    159.

    Y. Zhang and Y. Jin , 1961: An Upper Permian Brachiopoda fauna from Jiangxian. Anhui Province. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica , vol. 9, p. 401–417. (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar
    © by the Palaeontological Society of Japan
    Jun-Ichi Tazawa, Naotomo Kaneko, Chisato Suzuki, and Satoshi Hasegawa "Late Permian (Wuchiapingian) Brachiopod Fauna from the Lower Takakurayama Formation, Abukuma Mountains, Northeastern Japan," Paleontological Research 19(1), 33-51, (1 January 2015). https://doi.org/10.2517/2014PR027
    Received: 22 May 2013; Accepted: 1 June 2014; Published: 1 January 2015
    KEYWORDS
    Brachiopoda
    mixed Boreal—Tethyan fauna
    South Kitakami Belt
    Takakurayama Formation
    Wuchiapingian
    Back to Top