BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2013 Who Should Pay the Administrative Costs of an ITQ Fishery?
CARLOS A. CHÁVEZ
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Implementation and management of an ITQ fishery involves significant and costly administrative activities. These activities include formulating and implementing policy rules, monitoring and enforcement to deter illegal behavior, and economic and marine research. In this article we construct a model of a competitive ITQ system to analyze how the distribution of administrative costs between the public and a fishing industry can affect the equilibrium in the quota market, including equilibrium level of administrative costs, and derive results about the optimal distribution of these costs.

JEL Classification Codes: L51, Q22

CARLOS A. CHÁVEZ "Who Should Pay the Administrative Costs of an ITQ Fishery?," Marine Resource Economics 28(3), 243-261, (1 September 2013). https://doi.org/10.5950/0738-1360-28.3.243
Published: 1 September 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
19 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
administrative costs
Efficiency
individual transferable quotas
total allowable catch
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top