The CDC light trap with incandescent light is the most commonly used method for conducting sand fly surveillance. However, new trap models that use LED lights might provide a more cost-effective alternative. This study compared the efficacy of a modified commercial Katchy light trap with two CDC light trap models in capturing sand flies in the Amazonian rainforest of Peru. Using a 3 x 3 randomized Latin square design, the light traps were compared based on phlebotomine sand fly species total abundance, species richness, sex-specific collections, and efficiency in capturing potential vector species. A total of 1,184 sand flies were collected, representing nine genera and 25 species, including three species that had not been previously reported in the Cusco department. Significant differences in sand fly collections based on trap type were found, with the modified Katchy light trap capturing significantly higher total abundance and species richness compared to CDC light traps. This pattern held for both female and male sand flies, with the modified Katchy trap also collecting more potential vector species in terms of both abundance and species richness, although differences in potential vector species richness were only significant compared to the incandescent CDC light trap. These results suggest that the modified Katchy trap is a viable, cost-effective alternative for sand fly surveillance, offering potential improvements in leishmaniasis vector monitoring.