Denver W. Holt
Journal of Raptor Research 50 (1), 60-69, (1 March 2016) https://doi.org/10.3356/rapt-50-01-60-69.1
KEYWORDS: long-eared owl, Asio otus, Munsell Soil Color Chart, plumage color, sex determination, sex prediction
Most species of owls lack distinctive sexual color dimorphism, and plumage is not considered reliable for distinguishing sex. In North America, Long-eared Owls (Asio otus) are generally considered monomorphic in color, although there are subtle color differences between the sexes. From 1987 to 2015, we investigated differences in plumage coloration of male and female Long-eared Owls in western Montana. We initially used an observational method (1987–1993), followed by a quantitative method (1994–1999), and then a simplified method (2000–2015). When we used the observational method, we correctly sexed all 22 Long-eared Owls. For the quantitative method, we used a Munsell Soil Color Chart to score underwing coverts, tarsometatarsus, and facial disc of breeding males and females and museum specimens purportedly sexed correctly. We found significant sex-specific color differences: underwing coverts (G = 136.77, df = 5, P < 0.01), tarsometatarsus (G = 44.50, df = 4, P < 0.01), and facial disc (G = 50.62, df = 7, P < 0.01). Underwing coverts differed the most between sexes. Based on these plumage color differences, we then correctly sexed all 19 owls captured during fall and winter and later recaptured as breeding birds. Using the simplified method, we correctly predicted the sex of 55 of 58 (93%) owls captured during fall and winter and later recaptured as breeders. Overall, we correctly predicted sex of 96 of 99 (96.9%) Long-eared Owls in Montana. We suggest that plumage coloration differences should be investigated in other study areas outside of Montana.