Case summary A 13-year-old neutered female domestic shorthair cat was presented for further investigation of a right-sided cervical mass. Oral cavity examination revealed a unilateral, right tonsillar mass. Following a contrast-enhanced CT scan of head, thorax and abdomen, which showed no clear evidence of distant metastasis, cytology of the cervical mass was consistent with a metastatic retropharyngeal lymph node, and the patient underwent tonsillectomy and lymphadenectomy. The tumour was histopathologically confirmed to be a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node metastasis, and sequential chemotherapy treatments with carboplatin were administered. The cat underwent a second surgery to treat local recurrence and chemotherapy was continued. Subsequently, multiple lymphadenectomies to remove additional metastatic lymph nodes were performed, followed by adjuvant treatment with doxorubicin. Restaging procedures, performed every 3-6 months did not document any local recurrence nor any local or distant metastasis. The patient was euthanased after developing neoplastic pleural effusion 965 days following tonsillectomy.
Relevance and novel information Tonsillar tumours are rare in cats, but clinical presentation can be similar to that in dogs. Treatment with surgery and chemotherapy, and more importantly multiple lymphadenectomies, may delay the onset of distant metastasis and it should be considered in similar cases to possibly prolong survival.
Introduction
Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common tumour of the oral cavity in cats and usually involves the mandibular/maxillary bone or the oral mucosa.1,2 The tongue and tonsils can also be affected.3,4 Treatment options include surgery, radiotherapy (RT) alone or in association with chemotherapy, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).1,2,5–7
A retrospective study evaluating 31 cats with oral SCCs (located in the tongue, mandible, maxilla, tonsil and cheek) without distant metastases treated with RT and carboplatin as a radiosensitiser reported a median survival time (MST) of 163 days (range 53–770 days). In this study, four cats with tonsillar SCCs, of which two underwent lymphadenectomy to treat local metastatic disease, were grouped together with one case of SCC involving the oral mucosa: MST was not reached, and cats were still alive at the time of study closure, with a mean survival of 724 days, which was significantly longer when compared to the outcome of those patients with tumours in other anatomical locations (cats with SCCs of the tongue, mandible and maxilla experienced an MST of 141 days).4
Tonsillar SCCs are more frequently reported in dogs when compared to the feline specie; treatment options include surgery, RT and chemotherapy (usually carboplatin or anthracycline-based chemotherapy), although MST remains short and is usually in the range of 180–221 days.8,9 A more recent study found an overall MST of 243 days in 15 dogs with tonsillar carcinomas; those dogs with unilateral involvement and no evidence of metastatic disease had an MST of 637 days vs 134 and 75 days for those patients with local or distant metastasis, respectively.10 Literature about tonsillar SCC in cats is sparse, with the few cases described being included in reports regarding treatment of oral tumours with RT, surgery and chemotherapy.4,7,11At present, there is no evidence for the efficacy of surgery and/or chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting, nor any detailed information about survival in cats not treated with RT.
This case report describes the outcome of a cat with tonsillar SCC treated with a combination of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy.
Case description
A 13-year-old neutered female domestic shorthair cat was presented to our institution for further investigation of a right-sided cervical mass. The mass was incidentally noted by the owner a few weeks before presentation; the cat was asymptomatic. Cytology performed by the referring veterinarian was consistent with an epithelial neoplasm, most likely a carcinoma.
At the time of presentation, the cat weighed 4.3 kg and was in good body condition (body condition score 5/9). Clinical examination showed the presence of a 30 × 30 mm (caliper measurements) cervical mass, the location of which was consistent with an enlarged retropharyngeal lymph node. The remainder of the clinical examination was unremarkable, with no other peripheral lymphadenopathy.
Examination of the oral cavity under general anaesthesia revealed the presence of a large, friable and lobulated mass arising from the right tonsil (Figure 1). A contrast-enhanced CT scan of head, thorax and abdomen showed a right-sided tonsillar mass measuring 17 × 13 × 17 mm. There was no evidence of distant metastasis, although a marked enlargement of the right retropharyngeal lymph node was detected. Three-view thoracic radiographs were also performed for comparison at the time of subsequent follow-up, together with an excisional biopsy of the tonsillar mass; histopathology was consistent with a tonsillar SCC (Figure 2). Lymphadenectomy of the right ipsilateral retropharyngeal node was performed 3 weeks later, and histopathology confirmed lymph node metastasis from the tonsillar SCC (Figures 3 and 4).
Fourteen days after lymphadenectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy with single-agent carboplatin (Carbo-platino Teva; Teva Pharma) was started at 3-weekly intervals, at a dose of 240 mg/m2 as a slow (10 mins) intravenous (IV) infusion, following premedication with maropitant (Cerenia; Zoetis) at 1 mg/kg IV. The cat developed grade II gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (nausea and inappetence) and grade II neutropenia, classified according to the Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (VCOG-CTCAE).12 Subsequent doses were administered at 210 mg/m2 and were not associated with any toxicity. The cat was restaged at the time of the fourth carboplatin treatment, 115 days following tonsillectomy, with oral cavity examination and thoracic radiographs performed under general anaesthesia. The latter were negative for distant metastatic disease; however, a 5 × 3 mm mass arising from the right tonsillar crypt was detected and cytology confirmed recurrence of the previously excised SCC. The right mandibular lymph node was subjectively enlarged, and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) were performed; cytology was negative for metastatic disease, while the remainder of the peripheral lymph nodes of the cervical region were normal in shape and size and were therefore not sampled. The oral mass was excised and the oral mass was excised and histopathology confirmed local recurrence of the tonsillar tumour, with complete margins. A right mandibular lymphadenectomy was also concurrently performed to enable a more accurate assessment, and subsequent histopathology showed no evidence of metastasis to this site. The patient received two more cycles of chemotherapy and was restaged with oral cavity examination and three-view thoracic radiographs 162 days following tonsillectomy, at the time of the sixth carboplatin treatment: on clinical examination, the left mandibular lymph node was moderately enlarged vs the remaining contralateral, while all the others felt normal on palpation and were not sampled. Cytology of the left mandibular lymph node was consistent with suspected SCC metastasis and three-view thoracic radiographs were not suggestive of distant metastatic disease. The sixth carboplatin cycle was therefore administered. Three weeks later the patient was admitted for surgical excision of the previously confirmed metastatic left mandibular lymph node, and also for multiple lymphadenectomy to more accurately assess these sites for concurrent metastases. Histopathology findings of both mandibular lymph nodes, the left retropharyngeal and the right cervical lymph nodes were consistent with metastasis of a well-differentiated SCC, with tumour cells effacing approximately 80% of the left retropharyngeal and approximately 10% of the right mandibular lymph node.
Toceranib phosphate was discussed and offered as a maintenance therapy; however, the owner was unable to safely administer an oral antineoplastic agent and so a decision was made to prescribe meloxicam at 0.1 mg/kg PO q48h at home. This was well tolerated, and no GI toxicity was reported. Ninety days after the latest surgery, the patient was admitted for a recheck and an additional, enlarged right cervical lymph node was noted, while the remainder of the peripheral lymph nodes were normal on palpation. FNA of the right cervical lymph node and three-view thoracic radiographs were performed, cytology was compatible with SCC metastases and no pulmonary radiographic changes consistent with distant metastasis were identified. The cat underwent lymphadenectomy on the same day; histopathology later confirmed metastatic disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy was once again discussed with the owner, who agreed to start single-agent doxorubicin (Doxorubicina Teva; Teva Pharma). This was administered as a slow IV infusion at the standard dose of 1 mg/kg over 20 mins through an indwelling IV catheter, every 21 days. Urine specific gravity and renal parameters were within normal limits prior to each treatment; side effects consistent with myelosuppression, renal or GI toxicity were not detected during the chemotherapy course, with the only abnormality being a VCOG grade III normocytic normochromic non-regenerative anaemia, which was not present prior to starting chemotherapy. The cat received a total of four treatments and was subsequently restaged with physical and oral cavity examination and three-view thoracic radiographs every 3–6 months for more than a year following diagnosis, with no evidence of local recurrence or metastases (local and distant), 576 days following tonsillectomy. Despite recommending further rechecks every 6 months thereafter, the owner elected not to pursue them. The cat was presented to their local veterinarian, 383 days following the last restaging, as it suddenly developed respiratory distress; it was diagnosed with pleural effusion, with cytology consistent with an epithelial neoplasm, most likely a SCC. The owner declined any further investigations and the patient was euthanased 965 days following tonsillectomy.
Discussion
Tonsillar carcinoma is rarely reported in cats and its biological behaviour is not fully understood. Early studies in dogs indicate a poor prognosis, regardless of treatment received,8,9 although more recent results on 15 canine patients suggest a longer survival, when compared with historical controls, for those dogs with stage I disease and those treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (MST = 464 days).10 In a case series of cats with oral SCCs, including four tonsillar tumours, treated with surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, MST was not reached and cats were still alive at the time of study closure, with a mean survival of 724 days.4 Interestingly, two of these cases underwent lymphadenectomy, which could potentially improve the outcome of similar cases with local metastatic disease. At least two studies about canine oral SCCs have tried to correlate the histopathological grade with prognosis;13,14 although there is no similar study in cats, particularly in cases of tonsillar SCCs, the long survival experienced by our patient could also be related to the histopathological features of a well-differentiated tumour with a slower progression.
As local control in the canine specie could potentially result in a longer disease-free interval, the same principle may also apply to cats.15 Our patient received multiple lymphadenectomies over time and it is possible that some early metastases were missed, as not all the lymph nodes were cytologically sampled at the time of initial staging, as suggested by an early study.16 Additionally, a radical cervical lymph node extirpation was not considered sooner given the normal appearance and size of the majority of the lymph nodes examined.
Radiation treatment has been reported in dogs with tonsillar SCCs to treat inoperable tumours and associated metastatic lymph nodes, or as an adjuvant treatment in combination with chemotherapy,8,9 as well as in a few feline cases of tonsillar SCCs.3,4,11 Treatment with RT could have been considered in our case to prophylactically irradiate all the lymph nodes in the cervical region, as well as the previous surgery site; however, as it was not readily available in our practice and local metastases were not all detected at the same time, we opted to perform multiple lymphadenectomies and to manage local recurrence surgically, followed by medical treatment with cytotoxic drugs.
Distant metastatic disease in our case was likely delayed by the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, which has been described in the management of tonsillar tumours. Carboplatin has been used in both dogs and cats with various SCCs of the oral cavity, specifically as a radiosensitiser.4,6–10 A phase 1 clinical trial in cats concluded that carboplatin could be administered at a maximum tolerated dose of 240 mg/m2 IV;17 in our case, although only a grade II GI and haematological toxicity was shown, a dose reduction was made due to owner’s concerns and subsequent treatments were reported to be well tolerated since. Despite instituting adjuvant treatment, local recurrence developed, suggesting chemotherapy may not have any efficacy in controlling the disease locally. Margins could not be evaluated following the first tonsillectomy and so it is possible that residual disease had been initially overlooked. The sixth carboplatin treatment was administered as planned at the time local recurrence was found, as it was intended to delay distant metastasis, although the patient developed local metastatic disease following treatment.
Toceranib phosphate has been described in the treatment of solid tumours in dogs,18 including tonsillar SCC, and it has been similarly described for treatment of oral SCCs in cats.5 A maintenance therapy with this drug was discussed but declined as the owner was unable to administer oral medications. Furthermore, there is limited to no evidence in veterinary medicine that treatment with TKIs may be effective in similar cases. Instead, meloxicam was prescribed as there is published evidence of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression in oral SCCs in cats and dogs and it was thought that a COX inhibitor could potentially delay disease progression.19–21 Doxorubicin was used following the latest lymphadenectomy in light of the reported activity of anthracyclines against epithelial tumours in cats, and tonsillar SCCs in dogs;8,22,23 treatment was well tolerated throughout and no further local or distant metastasis was detected.
Despite developing neoplastic pleural effusion, most likely related to the development of pulmonary metastases, the long survival experienced by our patient may suggest that local control with multiple lymphadenectomies in association with adjuvant chemotherapy may be able to delay the onset of distant metastatic disease, particularly in case of well-differentiated tumours.
Conclusions
Tonsillar SCCs in cats may have a similar clinical presentation when compared with dogs; multimodal treatment with surgery, including multiple lymphadenectomies, and adjuvant chemotherapy might be able to control local and distant metastases and prolong survival. Further investigations into the biological behaviour and ideal treatment of tonsillar carcinomas in cats are warranted.
Conflict of interest The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical approval This work involved the use of non-experimental animals only (including owned or unowned animals and data from prospective or retrospective studies). Established internationally recognised high standards (‘best practice’) of individual veterinary clinical patient care were followed. Ethical approval from a committee was therefore not specifically required for publication in JFMS.
Informed consent Informed consent (either verbal or written) was obtained from the owner or legal custodian of all animal(s) described in this work (either experimental or non-experimental animals) for the procedure(s) undertaken (either prospective or retrospective studies). No animals or humans are identifiable within this publication, and therefore additional informed consent for publication was not required.