How to translate text using browser tools
29 July 2016 Comparative Responses of Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) to the Synthetic Attractant BioLure
Nayeli Déctor, Edi A. Malo, Julio C. Rojas, Pablo Liedo
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The responses of wild and sterile Anastrepha ludens (Loew) and Anastrepha obliqua (Mcquart) fruit flies to the synthetic attractant BioLure were determined by electroantennography (EAG), in field cage tests using MultiLure traps, and by release–recapture field experiments using sterile flies. In EAG bioassays, no differences were found between species, sexes, sterile and wild flies. There were only specific differences and interactions in dose responses. More A. ludens than A. obliqua individuals were captured in multilure traps in field cage test. In A. ludens, there was not significant difference between the number of females and males captured, whereas in A. obliqua more females than males were caught. Age showed a bimodal response in both species and both sexes, with peaks at 4 and 14 d old. In the release–recapture experiments, there were significant differences between species, sexes, and orchards and among the days after release. More individuals of A. ludens than A. obliqua were recaptured. Only in A. obliqua the difference between the sexes was significant, with a 3.60:1 female:male ratio. Orchard conditions affected the recapture rate, but in both orchards the largest number of flies recaptured occurred during the first day after release (46 and 88% in each orchard). Our results show that the response to this synthetic lure is species-specific and contribute to better interpret trapping data.

© The Authors 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Nayeli Déctor, Edi A. Malo, Julio C. Rojas, and Pablo Liedo "Comparative Responses of Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) to the Synthetic Attractant BioLure," Journal of Economic Entomology 109(5), 2054-2060, (29 July 2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tow169
Received: 7 April 2016; Accepted: 5 July 2016; Published: 29 July 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
electroantennography
Food attractant
Mexican fruit fly
trapping
West Indian fruit fly
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top