A model is proposed for the evolution of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) in which natural selection initially favors the silencing of paternally derived alleles of X-linked demand inhibitors. The compensatory upregulation of maternally derived alleles establishes a requirement for monoallelic expression in females. For this reason, XCI is self-reinforcing once established. However, inactivation of a particular X chromosome is not. Random XCI (rXCI) is favored over paternal XCI because rXCI reduces the costs of functional hemizygosity in females. Once present, rXCI favors the evolution of locus-by-locus imprinting of X-linked loci, which creates an evolutionary dynamic in which different chromosomes compete to remain active.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2006
SELF-IMPOSED SILENCE: PARENTAL ANTAGONISM AND THE EVOLUTION OF X-CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION
David Haig
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.
Evolution
Vol. 60 • No. 3
March 2006
Vol. 60 • No. 3
March 2006
Dosage compensation
GENOMIC IMPRINTING
parental antagonism
SEXUAL ANTAGONISM
X-chromosome inactivation