BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
19 August 2019 A new Dichaetanthera (Melastomataceae: Melastomateae) from Masoala National Park in Madagascar
Heritiana Ranarivelo, Frank Almeda
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Ranarivelo, H. & F. Almeda (2019). A new Dichaetanthera (Melastomataceae: Melastomateae) from Masoala National Park in Madagascar. Candollea 74: 131–136. In English, English and French abstracts. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15553/c2019v742a2

Dichaetanthera schatzii H. Ranariv. & Almeda, a new species from Masoala National Park in northeastern Madagascar, is described, illustrated, and compared with Dichaetanthera arborea Baker, its presumed closest relative. Dichaetanthera schatzii appears to be endemic to the lowland humid evergreen forest on the southwestern side of Masoala National Park in Madagascar.

Introduction

Dichaetanthera Endl., a genus of paleotropical Melastomataceae, consists of 35 currently recogniZed species. Twenty seven of these are endemic to Madagascar (Perrier De La BÂThie, 1951; Almeda, 2003; Madagascar Catalogue, 2019). Eight other species grow in tropical Africa where most of the diversity is centered from Cameroon, Gabon, and the Democratic Republic of Congo to Angola, Zambia, and TanZania (Wickens, 1975; Fernandes & Fernandes, 1978; Jacques-FÉLix, 1983a, 1983b; Figueiredo & Smith, 2008). The widespread Dichaetanthera africana (Hook. f.) Jacq.-Fél. also ranges to Equatorial Guinea, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, and Sierra Leone and D. echinulata (Hook. f.) Jacq.-Fél. is restricted to Sierra Leone and Guinea (Hutchinson et al., 1954; Wickens, 1975; Jacques-Felix, 1983a; Parmentier & Geerinck, 2003).

Dichaetanthera appears to be a monophyletic genus (Veranso-Libalah et al., 2017). It is readily recogniZed by the following combination of characters: 4-merous flowers, persistent truncate or well-developed calyx lobes that are uncontorted in bud to expose the petals, stamens slightly to markedly unequal in siZe in each flower with the connectives modified ventro-basally at the filament junction into yellow erect biaristate appendages, and seeds that are cochleate to ± cuneiform with a tuberculate testa on the antiraphal and chalaZal sides (Perrier De La BÂThie, 1932).

The species described here was recogniZed as undescribed nearly twenty years ago when the second author was doing routine identifications of Malagasy Melastomataceae at CAS. The only known collection of this species was set aside in hopes that additional material would eventually turn up. Unfortunately, no additional material of this species has come to light since it was first collected in 1989. We therefore see no reason to delay its formal recognition. We have initiated a project focused on the systematics and phylogeny of Dichaetanthera since available taxonomic information for the Malagasy members of the genus dates back to the seminal study by Perrier De La BÂThie (1932) nearly 90 years ago.

Taxonomic treatment

Dichaetanthera schatzii H. Ranariv. & Almeda, spec. nova (Fig. 1, 2).

  • Holotypus: Madagascar. Reg. Analanjirofo [Prov. Toamasina]: Masoala Peninsula, c. 3 km NE of Antalavia, along Antalavia River, [15°47′S 50°02′E], 200–380 m, 13–16.XI.1989, Schatz et al. 2806 (CAS!; iso-: K image seen, MO-3759746!, P, TAN image seen).

  • Distinguished from all other species of Dichaetanthera Endl. in Madagascar and Africa by the combination of large (1519.7 × 77.5 cm) entire lanceolate leaf blades that are sparsely beset abaxially mostly on the prominently elevated veins with a mixture of appressed papillose trichomes and minute brownish glandlike trichomes; small (67 × 24 mm) pink elliptic-ovate to elliptic-lanceolate petals with ciliate margins that are acute to obtuse at the apex and unguiculate at the base; and markedly dimorphic androecium.

  • Tree to 4 m tall. Distal branches rounded-quadrangular, the internodes sparsely to copiously covered with a mixture of small (0.25–0.5 mm long) knob-like papillose trichomes and longer (0.75–1 mm) subulate trichomes that are also inconspicuously papillose for most of their length; nodes somewhat swollen with an elevated ridge-like interpetiolar line beset with a few subulate trichomes 1.5–3.5 mm long that are inconspicuously papillose at least along the basal swollen third of their length. Leaves opposite and decussate, isomorphic in siZe and shape in each pair, widely spreading when fresh; petioles 22–43 mm long, subterete to somewhat laterally compressed, copiously covered with appressed subulate trichomes 0.25–1.5(–3) mm long that are papillose for most of their length; blades 14–20 × 5.3–7.5 cm, subcoriaceous when dry, lanceolate, the base rounded, the apex acute to attenuate, the margin entire with non-overlapping subulate trichomes 0.5–1.5 mm long like those on the petioles, 5–7-nerved, the primary and secondary veins elevated and diverging from one another at the blade base abaxially; abaxial surface sparsely beset mostly on elevated primary and secondary veins with a mixture of appressed subulate papillose trichomes 0.25–2 mm long and minute inconspicuous brownish glandlike trichomes mostly less than 0.25 mm long that are also copious on higher order veins; adaxial surface inconspicuously beset with scattered appressed conic trichomes 0.5 mm long that are pustulate at the base and minutely papillate to barbellate for a portion of their length, these accompanied by one or two inconspicuous brownish sessile glands at the trichome base. Inflorescence a terminal pyramidal panicle 18–20 cm long, sub-sessile or on a solitary peduncle 6–7 cm long, the primary and higher order axes copiously covered with trichomes 0.3–1 mm long like those of the distal internodes; pedicels 0.5–2 mm long with indumentum like that of the inflorescence axes; floral bracts caducous at anthesis and not seen; bracteoles also typically caducous at anthesis, sessile, 2 × 0.75 mm, ± ensiform, base truncate, apex acute, abaxial surface pustulate with a row of papillose conic trichomes ± restricted to the median vein, adaxial surface glabrous, the margin entire and ciliate. Hypanthium (at anthesis) 2–3 mm long to the torus and 2.5 mm in diameter, subcylindric to suburceolate, beset with appressed barbellate trichomes mostly 0.5–1 mm long that do not conceal the surface; calyx tube ca. 0.75 mm long; calyx lobes persistent, 1 × 1.5–2 mm, shorter than the hypanthium, triangular to rounded-triangular, indumentum like that of the hypanthium, the margin entire and minutely ciliolate. Petals 4, 6–7 × 2–4 mm, elliptic-ovate to elliptic-lanceolate, apex acute to obtuse, base unguiculate, pink, entire and ciliate. Stamens 8, dimorphic and fertile; antesepalous stamen filaments 5 mm long, white to pale pink, glabrous; anther thecae 4 mm long and 1 mm in diameter, linear-subulate and ventrally undulate, pale pink, apical pore ventrally inclined; pedoconnective 6 mm long, modified ventro-basally into a yellow biaristate ± erect appendage 6 mm long, the lobes fused basally for c. 2 mm; antepetalous stamen filaments 5 mm long, white to pale pink, glabrous; anther thecae 3–3.5 mm long and ca. 0.5 mm in diameter, linear-oblong, yellow, ventrally somewhat undulate, apical pore truncate to somewhat dorsally inclined; pedoconnective 1 mm long, modified ventro-basally into a yellow biaristate appendage 6 mm long, the lobes fused basally for 1 mm. Ovary (at anthesis) 3 mm long and 2 mm in diameter, ovoid to elliptic-ovoid, glabrous for most of its length but covered with a crown of erect and somewhat flattened basally fused distinctly barbellate trichomes 0.5–0.75 mm long intermixed with minute barbellate trichomes 0.25–0.5 mm long at the summit surrounding the base of the style, superior, 4-locular; style 7.5–8 mm long and 0.5 mm in diameter, white to pale pink, glabrous, somewhat declinate, terete and swollen distally just below the punctiform stigma. Mature capsules and seeds not seen.

  • Etymology. – We take pleasure in naming this species for George E. SchatZ (1953–), collector of the type. George has been a long-time student of the Malagasy flora (Schatz, 2001) who has made many significant contributions to our knowledge of this unique and highly endemic biodiversity hotspot.

  • Distribution and habitat.Dichaetanthera schatzii is known only from low-elevation rainforest on the Masoala Peninsula of northeastern Madagascar where it was collected along the Antalavia river at 200–380 m elevation (Fig. 3).

  • Phenology. – The type and only known collection of Dichaetanthera schatzii, which was made in the middle of November, is in flower.

  • Conservation status.Dichaetanthera schatzii appears to be endemic to the lowland humid evergreen forest on the southwestern side of Masoala National Park as it is currently delimited. This national park, which encompasses 230,000 hectares, was established by the Madagascar government (decree no. 97-141) in February 1997. It is Madagascar's largest protected area and makes up about 50% of the total lowland humid evergreen forest that currently has protected status in Madagascar (Kremen, 2003). The Masoala peninsula has long been recogniZed as an area of high plant diversity and ende-mism (Perrier De La BÂThie, 1921; Dransfield & Beentje, 1995; Kremen, 2003; Scherberich & Duruisseau, 2016, 2019; Baker et al., 2016). Dichaetanthera schatzii appears to be afforded some protection because of its occurrence within a vast protected area. We have no information on whether the major habitat threats on the peninsula such as deforestation, habitat conversion and fragmentation, and overcollecting of forest products have affected the local environment where D. schatzii grows. The type, locality, which is quite remote, is 3 km inland and up the Antalavia river where it is unlikely that there are any of the above mentioned threats (G. SchatZ, pers. comm.). Although we also lack information on the population siZe of this species, we recommend a conservation status of “Least Concern” [LC] based on IUCN (2012, 2017) guidelines and criteria. This recommendation is made with the caveat that this status is dependent on ongoing effective management of the protected area.

  • Notes. – Of the four sections of Dichaetanthera recogniZed by Perrier De La BÂThie (1951), D. schatzii can be assigned to Dichaetanthera sect. Dichaetanthera based on its dimorphic stamens in which the larger (antesepalous) ones exceed 4 mm in length, the calyx lobes are sparsely beset with short appressed trichomes that do not conceal the epidermis, and the ovary is covered with trichomes for at least the upper quarter of its length. Of the 13 species comprising sect. Dichaetanthera this new species keys closely to D. arborea Baker, a species that appears to be most similar based on overall morphology; however, the latter differs consistently from D. schatzii in a number of important characters. It has smaller (6–12 × 1.2–4 cm) leaf blades that are 5-plinerved with the secondary (inner pair) of veins diverging from the primary vein 3–5 mm from the blade base with the formation of pocules (acarodomatia?) on each side of the primary vein [v. 5–7-nerved blades that are larger (15–19.7 × 7–7.5 cm) with all elevated abaxial veins diverging from the blade base and pocules absent]. In D. arborea the indumentum on distal internodes consists solely of entire or irregularly lacerate flattened scales 0.3–1 mm long (vs. a mixture of small knoblike papillose trichomes 0.25–0.5 mm long and longer subulate trichomes 0.75–1 mm long that are also inconspicuously papillose for most of their length). The nodal indumentum of D. arborea consists of subulate flattened scales 0.5–3.2 mm long (vs. subulate trichomes 1.5–3.5 mm long that are minutely papillose for at least the basal swollen third of their length).

  • Dichaetanthera schatzii and D. arborea also differ consistently in details of the foliar indumentum. The abaxial foliar surfaces (between the elevated veins) of D. arborea are beset with lacerate flattened scales 0.5–1 mm long with pustulate bases that adhere to the epidermis. The elevated abaxial foliar veins of this species are also beset with flattened subulate scales that become slightly longer (0.5–1.5 mm) but glandlike trichomes are lacking altogether. In D. schatzii, the abaxial foliar surface is covered mostly on the elevated primary and secondary veins with a mixture of appressed subulate papillose trichomes 0.25–2 mm long and minute brownish glandlike trichomes mostly less than 0.25 mm long; the latter trichomes are also copious on higher order veins abaxially.

  • Dichaetanthera schatzii and its closest relative also differ in hypanthial indumentum and in petal details. The hyp-anthia and calyx lobes of D. arborea are sparsely covered with appressed entire or lacerate scales 0.25–0.5 mm long (vs. appressed conic barbellate trichomes 0.5–1 mm long). Dichaetanthera schatzii and D. arborea have comparatively small flowers with petals of similar siZe (6–7 × 2–4 mm in D. schatzii and 8–9 × 5 mm in D. arborea); the petals of both species are unguiculate at the base and have ciliate margins. In the former the petals are pink, elliptic-ovate to elliptic-lanceolate with an acute to obtuse apex whereas the latter has magenta petals that are widely obovate to obcordate or nearly orbicular in shape with an obliquely rounded or shallowly emarginate apex.

  • Both D. schatzii and D. arborea are reportedly forest trees. We still have too little information to determine whether they attain different heights at maturity. The collection label on D. schatzii gives plant height as 4 m whereas published descriptions for D. arborea give its height as 7–10 m (Perrier De La BÂThie, 1932, 1951). These two species also appear to be allopatric. Our new species is known only from the Masoala Peninsula at 200–380 m whereas D. arborea is reported to be largely restricted to the Mangoro basin and vicinity east of Antananarivo. Most of the herbarium material of D. arborea was collected at 1000–1500 m but one specimen was collected as low as 300 m (Perrier De La BâThie, 1951).

  • Although the pollinators of D. schatzii are unknown, the pale pink and yellow colors of the androecium in this species seem to undergo a change to deep pink probably following pollination (Fig. 2). Flowers that have undergone color change involving petals, anthers, or filaments following pollination offer no food rewards (GORI, 1983). Pollinators evidently pick up on this signal and probably increase their foraging efficiency by visiting only unpollinated flowers. Flower color change following pollination has been reported for some neotropical genera of Melastomataceae and appears to be more widespread than published reports indicate (Todzia & Almeda, 1991; Martins & Almeda, 2017).

  • Fig. 1.

    Dichaetanthera schatzii H. Ranariv. & Almeda. A. Habit; B. Enlargement of inflorescence node; C. Representative leaf (abaxial surface); D. Detail of indumentum on elevated primary vein; E. Petal (adaxial surface); F–G. Antepetalous (small) stamens (profile view); H–I. Antesepalous (large) stamens (profile view); J. Hypanthium and calyx lobes enveloping capsule (profile view); K. Ovary, style and stigma (profile view). [Schatz et al. 2806, CAS] [Drawings: A. Chou]

    f01_131.jpg

    Fig. 2.

    Dichaetanthera schatzii H. Ranariv. & Almeda, showing leaves and the terminal paniculate inflorescence. [Photo: D. J. DuPuy]

    f02_131.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Map showing the distribution of Dichaetanthera schatzii H. Ranariv. & Almeda.

    f03_131.jpg

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Alan Chou for the line drawing, Ricardo B. Pacif-ico for the distribution map, the Missouri Botanical Garden for gifts and loans of specimens, David J. Du Puy for the image of D. schatzii taken in the field, Heidi Schmidt and George E. SchatZ for information on collections of Malagasy Melastomataceae at MO and for advice on the conservation status, EliZabeth Woodgyer for a digital image of the isotype at K, and Martin W. Callmander for checking collections at G. Herbarium specimens or online images of Dichaetanthera were examined from the following herbaria: CAS, G, K, MO, P, TAN, and WAG. Finally, we thank R. Douglas Stone and Martin W. Callmander for helpful reviews of the manuscript.

    References

    1.

    Almeda, F. (2003). Melastomataceae: Princess Flowers. In: Goodman, S.M. & J.P. Benstead (ed.), The Natural History of Madagascar : 375–379. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar

    2.

    Baker, W.j., W.l. Eiserhardt, M. Rakotoariniro, A.z. Andriamanantena, R.n. Rabarijoana & S.h.j.v. Rapanarivo (2016). The palms of the Masoala. Palms 60: 169–193. Google Scholar

    3.

    Dransfield, J. & H.j. Beentje (1995). The palms of Madagascar . Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and the International Palm Society, UK. Google Scholar

    4.

    Fernandes, R. & A. Fernandes (1978). Melastomataceae. In: Launert, E. (ed.), Fl. Zambesiaca 4: 220–276. Google Scholar

    5.

    Figueiredo, E. & G.f. Smith (2008). Plants of Angola. Strelitzia 22. Google Scholar

    6.

    Gori, D.f. (1983). Post-pollination phenomena and adaptive floral change. In: Jones, C.E. & R.J. Little (ed.) Handbook of experimental pollination biology : 31–49. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York. Google Scholar

    7.

    Hutchinson, J., J. Dalziel & R. Keay (1954). Fl. W. Trop. Africa. Vol. 1(1). Crown Agents for Overseas Governments & Administrations, London. Google Scholar

    8.

    IUCN (2012). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1. Ed. 2 IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland and Cambridge. Google Scholar

    9.

    IUCN[Standards and Petitions Subcommittee] (2017). Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria . Version 13. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. [  http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar

    10.

    Jacques-Félix, H. (1983a). Mélastomatacées. In: Leroy, J.-F. (ed.), Fl. Gabon 25. Google Scholar

    11.

    Jacques-Félix, H. (1983b). Mélastomatacées. In: SantibiÉ, B. & J.-F. Leroy (ed.), Fl. Cameroun 24. Google Scholar

    12.

    Kremen, C. (2003). The Masoala Peninsula. In: Goodman, S.M. & J.P. Benstead (ed.), The Natural History of Madagascar : 1459–1466. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar

    13.

    Madagascar Catalogue (2019). Catalogue of the Plants of Madagascar . Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis & Antananarivo. [  http://www.tropicos.org/Project/MadagascarGoogle Scholar

    14.

    Martins, A.b. & F. Almeda (2017). A monograph of the BraZil-ian endemic genus Lavoisiera (Melastomataceae: Microlicieae). Phytotaxa 315. Google Scholar

    15.

    Parmentier, I. & D. Geerinck (2003). Checklist of the Melastomataceae of Equatorial Guinea. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 60: 331–346. Google Scholar

    16.

    Perrier De La Bâthie, H. (1921). La végétation malgache. Ann. Mus. Colon. Marseille ser. 3, 9. Google Scholar

    17.

    Perrier De La Bâthie, H. (1932). Les Mélastomatacées de Madagascar. Mém. Acad. Malgache 12. Google Scholar

    18.

    Perrier De La Bâthie, H. (1951). Mélastomatacées. In: Humbert, H. (ed.), Fl. Madagascar Comores 153. Google Scholar

    19.

    Schatz, G.e. (2001). Generic tree flora of Madagascar . Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew & Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. Google Scholar

    20.

    Scherberich, D. & J. Duruisseau (2016). Begonia henrilaportei Schreber. & J. Duruisseau (Begoniaceae), a new endemic species from the Masoala peninsula, Madagascar. Candollea 71: 13– 18. Google Scholar

    21.

    Scherberich, D. & J. Duruisseau (2019). Three new species of Begonia sect. Erminea (Begoniaceae) from north-east Madagascar. Adansonia ser. 3, 41: 59–67. Google Scholar

    22.

    Todzia, C.a. & F. Almeda (1991). A revision of Tibouchina section Lepidotae (Melastomataceae: Tibouchineae). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 47: 175–206. Google Scholar

    23.

    Veranso-Libalah, M.c., R.d. Stone, A.g.n. Fongod, T.l.p. Couvreur & G. Kadereit (2017). Phylogeny and systematics of African Melastomateae (Melastomataceae). Taxon 66: 584–614. Google Scholar

    24.

    Wickens, G.e. (1975). Melastomataceae. In: Polhill, R.M. (ed.), Fl. Trop. E. Africa.  Google Scholar
    © CONSERVATOIRE ET JARDIN BOTANIQUES DE GENÈVE 2019
    Heritiana Ranarivelo and Frank Almeda "A new Dichaetanthera (Melastomataceae: Melastomateae) from Masoala National Park in Madagascar," Candollea 74(2), 131-136, (19 August 2019). https://doi.org/10.15553/c2019v742a2
    Published: 19 August 2019
    KEYWORDS
    Dichaetanthera
    Madagascar
    Melastomataceae
    new species
    taxonomy
    Back to Top