Evidence is presented to show that Aloe teissieri Lavranos was effectively published before Aloe andohahelensis J.-B. Castillon, and since these two taxa are now considered to be conspecific, the former name has priority over the latter.
Evidence is presented to show that Aloe teissieri Lavranos was effectively published before Aloe andohahelensis J.-B. Castillon, and since these two taxa are now considered to be conspecific, the former name has priority over the latter.