BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 February 2017 Occurrence of Ctenomys mendocinus in a High-Altitude Cold Desert: Effect on Density, Biomass, and Fitness of Sagebrush Plants
Natalia Andino, Carlos E. Borghi
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In arid and semiarid ecosystems, subterranean herbivorous rodents play an important role in determining the composition, function, and structure of plant communities. We hypothesized that in a high-altitude cold desert in the southern Puna region of Argentina, Ctenomys mendocinus (mendocino tuco-tuco), a subterranean herbivorous rodent, may increase dominance of the shrub Artemisia mendozana (sagebrush). We performed an observational study to assess factors affecting the abundance and fitness of A. mendozana in southern Puna, on sites co-inhabited and undisturbed by C. mendocinus. Density, biomass, plant height, number of fruits per plant, number of seeds, and seed size of A. mendozana were higher in mendocino tuco-tuco—disturbed areas.

Because the abundance and reproductive ability of sagebrush increase in areas inhabited by mendocino tuco-tucos, C. mendocinus may function as an ecosystem engineer in southern Puna. We suggest further manipulative experimental studies be conducted to clarify the role of this subterranean rodent in this ecosystem.

Introduction

Many subterranean and burrowing mammals have been identified as keystone species (a species with strong effects on community structure or ecosystem function, relative to its abundance; Power et al., 1996) and/or ecosystem engineers (i.e., organisms that directly or indirectly modulate the availability of resources to other species, by causing physical state changes in biotic or abiotic materials; Jones et al., 1994). The important impacts of subterranean and burrowing mammals on ecosystems manifest through activities such as feeding on particular vegetation and modifying soil biogeochemistry (Kotliar, 2000; Reichman and Seabloom, 2002; Zhang et al., 2003; Berke, 2010; Hagenah and Bennett, 2013). These processes can modify the physical environment through critical interactions that generate effects at multiple ecological levels (patch, population, community, ecosystem, and landscape; Eldridge and James, 2009; Hagenah and Bennett, 2013; Wright and Jones, 2006).

In arid and semiarid ecosystems, subterranean herbivorous rodents may affect the structure of plant communities in at least two ways: directly, by consuming whole plants or parts of them (Campos et al., 2001; Lara et al., 2007; Reichman, 2007; Van Nimwegen et al., 2008); and indirectly, by their digging activities, moving soil and altering its physical and chemical features (Reichman and Seabloom, 2002). A recent review of disturbances by small mammals reported effects on plant species richness, diversity, and biomass, but almost all studies reviewed were conducted at a community level (Root-Bernstein and Ebensperger, 2012) without regard for effects at the population level.

The mendocino tuco-tuco, Ctenomys mendocinus (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae) is a medium-sized subterranean herbivorous rodent (145–180 g; 247–262 mm) restricted to the arid lands of central west Argentina (Rosi et al., 2005). C. mendocinus builds complex burrow systems with several entrances (usually closed), some of them with soil mounds near the entrances and others called feeding holes, which are immediately beside the plants they consume (Reig et al., 1990; Rosi et al., 1996). Previous research on the ecology of C. mendocinus describes it as a potential ecosystem engineer because of its burrowing and feeding activities, which decease the spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients (Borruel et al., 1998; Campos et al., 2001; Lara et al., 2007; Tort et al., 2007; Albanese et al., 2010).

Generally speaking, herbivory on dominant plant species has been shown to increase the possibility of establishment of new plants due to competition reduction (Campos et al., 2001; Lara et al., 2007; Albanese et al., 2010). Herbivory may also alter plant morphology because of selective feeding on specific plant tissues, as well as plant reproduction (Camin and Madoery, 1994; Rosi et al., 2003). Burrowing activities may increase fitness of plants by increasing nutrient concentrations (N, P, K) required for flowering and fruit set (Malizia et al., 2000; Lara et al., 2007).

Although Ctenomys sp. has been suggested to be an ecosystem engineer, its role in particular ecosystems has not yet been formally assessed. Previous research in the southern Puna desert showed that the mendocino tuco-tuco may increase dominance of the shrub Artemisia mendozana (sagebrush) in plant communities (80% of total plant cover; Lara et al., 2007). The mendocino tuco-tuco feeds on almost all plant species in the southern Puna desert, including A. mendozana (2.85%; Rosi et al., 2003). Despite this pattern, however, the highest sagebrush cover occurs at sites inhabited by this rodent (Lara et al., 2007). In the present study, we assess the factors that may contribute to the abundance of A. mendozana in southern Puna, at paired sites inhabited and relatively undisturbed by C. mendocinus. We hypothesized that the mendocino tuco-tuco generates a favorable environment for sagebrush plants, increasing their cover and reproductive ability. Specifically, we predicted: (1) sagebrush density and biomass will be higher at sites inhabited by mendocino tuco-tucos, (2) individual sagebrush plants will be larger (in weight and height) at sites inhabited by mendocino tuco-tucos, (3) the number of flowers and fruits per plant, and/or the number of seeds per fruit will be higher at sites inhabited by mendocino tuco-tucos, and (4) total seed production will be greater at sites inhabited by mendocino tuco-tucos.

Methods

Study Site

This study was conducted in Don Carmelo Multiple Use Private Reserve, a protected area of about 40,000 ha, located in La Invernada valley (31°10′S, 69°46′W, at 3000 m a.s.l.), San Juan Province, Argentina, which lies within the Puna desert (Martínez Carretero, 1995; Reboratti, 2006). The vegetation is composed of low xerophytic shrubs and grasses, with large areas of bare soil (Márquez, 1999; Lara et al., 2007). Climate in the Puna is characterized by long, dry cold periods and a wide daily temperature range; rainfall occurs primarily in summer and does not exceed 100 mm a year (Martínez Carretero, 1995; Reboratti, 2006). In Don Carmelo, there are temperature records only for 2010. For this year, mean annual temperature was 8.15 °C, maximum absolute temperature was 26.00 °C, and minimum absolute temperature was -22.00 °C. Snowfall occurs mainly between May and October, and winter snow can reach 50 cm depth although it usually remains on the ground for less than 15 days (personal observation).

Sampling Design

To assess the impact of tuco-tucos on A. mendozana, we carried out a comparative factorial study both at the beginning of the flowering period of sagebrush and in its fruiting period (wet and dry seasons, respectively). We randomly selected four sites within the community and chose two types of areas in each site: (1) areas with high density of holes (3.46/2 m2) and mounds (1.82/2 m2) of mendocino tuco-tucos (areas highly disturbed by tuco-tucos = “disturbed”), and (2) areas with low density of holes (0.36/2 m2) and mounds (0.25/2 m2) of mendocino tuco-tucos (areas relatively undisturbed = “undisturbed”; Lara et al., 2007). In each area (disturbed and undisturbed), we established three 8-m-long parallel transects (replicates) with 4 sampling quadrats (1×1 m) at 1-m intervals. In each quadrat we recorded number and height of sagebrush individuals. During the flowering and fruiting periods we collected the individuals in each quadrat in order to record other parameters in the laboratory. Clipped plants were oven-dried at 70 °C for 24 h, weighed, and biomass was converted to kg per 12 m2. The number of flowers present on each plant was recorded. During the fruiting period and before seed dispersal, we quantified the number of fruits per sagebrush plant and estimated seed number per plant by multiplying the total number of fruits by the average number of seeds in 10 fruits of each plant. Seed size was estimated by measuring the area and perimeter of seeds from 20 samples of 20 seeds per site (10 from disturbed sites and 10 from undisturbed sites) using a scanner according to the method of image analysis proposed by O'Neal et al. (2002) and the Scion Image for Windows software version 4.0.3.2 (Scion Corporation, 2000–2001).

Finally, we estimated seed set, total seed production per plant, and total seed production per square meter. To estimate seed set, we divided the mean number of seeds produced per plant by the mean number of flowers per plant. To estimate total seed production per square meter, we multiplied the mean number of plants per square meter by the mean number of fruits per plant and by the mean number of seeds per fruit.

Statistical Analysis

To evaluate the effect of C. mendocinus perturbation on population (density, biomass), individual (height, weight) and reproductive (flowers, fruits, seeds) responses of A. mendozana, we obtained, for each variable, an average value in each replicate. We used Linear Mixed Models (LMMs) with Gaussian error distributions as implemented by nlme package (Bolker et al., 2008; Zuur et al., 2009; Pinheiro et al., 2016) within the R computational environment version R 3.2.5 (R Development Core Team, 2016). Disturbance was included as a fixed factor with two levels: disturbed and undisturbed. Site and season were defined as random factors in LMMs. In order to evaluate the effect of tucotucos on reproductive variables, we included plant size (weight and height) in LMMs as a covariate. To assess seed size (perimeter and area) in disturbed and undisturbed areas we also used LMMs with site as a random effect. We determined the significance of the fixed effects using likelihood ratio tests (Bolker et al., 2008). Results are presented as mean ± standard error (SE), and for null hypothesis testing, statistical tests were considered significant at α < 0.05.

Results

Population Level

LMM analyses revealed that density of sagebrush plants was significantly higher in highly disturbed areas (22.41 ± 1.63 vs. 14.45 ± 1.09 plants m-2; p < 0.0001; Table 1 and Fig. 1, part A). This pattern was also evident for plant biomass (disturbed = 684.11 ± 79.36 kg 12 m-2 and undisturbed = 495.25 ± 66.63 kg 12 m-2, respectively; p = 0.0002; Table 1 and Fig. 1, part A).

Individual Level

Sagebrush plant size was measured through the proxy variables weight and height of plants. Disturbance by mendocino tuco-tucos affected the height but not the weight of individual sagebrush plants (Table 1 and Fig. 1, part B), with plants being slightly taller in disturbed areas (17.22 ± 0.62 cm vs. 15.33 ± 0.64 cm; p = 0.001; Fig. 1, part B).

Reproduction Level

During the flowering period we collected a total of 440 individuals from disturbed and undisturbed areas. The number of flowers per sagebrush plant did not vary with C. mendocinus disturbance (32.79 ± 3.53 and 30.90 ± 4.58; p = 0.60; Table 1 and Fig. 1, part C). In the fruiting period we collected 458 individuals from both areas. Sagebrush plants in disturbed areas produced more than twice the number of fruits compared to those in undisturbed areas (12.19 ± 1.40 vs. 4.86 ± 0.92 fruits m-2; p = 0.004; Fig. 1, part C). Furthermore, the number of seeds per sagebrush plant was higher in disturbed than in undisturbed areas (26.36 ± 1.27 and 12.17 ± 1.93, respectively; p = 0.0006; Table 1 and Fig. 1, part D). In relation to seed size, we observed slightly larger seeds in disturbed areas, there being a near-significant result for area and a significant effect for perimeter (p = 0.06 and p = 0.04, respectively; Table 1 and Fig. 1, part D).

We found no differences in number of flowers per plant between disturbed and undisturbed areas, but seed set was significantly higher in disturbed areas (12.5 ± 1.58 vs. 26.6 ± 1.2; p = <0.001; Table 2). In addition, seed production per square meter was nearly eight times greater in disturbed than in undisturbed areas (Table 2).

Discussion

Measures of individual and population health, and reproductive success, of A. mendozana increased significantly in disturbed areas, suggesting that activities of the mendocino tuco-tuco affect sagebrush plants positively.

We found that sagebrush density increased in disturbed areas. This finding is consistent with Lara et al. (2007), who found a significant increase in number of A. mendozana shrubs in mendocino tuco-tuco-disturbed areas. Sagebrush represented 47% of the total individual plants recorded in undisturbed areas, whereas in disturbed areas, its dominance increased as much as 80% (Lara et al., 2007). Previous research on the diet and herbivory of C. mendocinus shows that it mainly consumes herbs (such as Stipa sp. and Elymus erianthus; Rosi et al., 2003) and other shrubs (Lycium chanar, Junellia uniflora, and Senecio spp.; Tort et al., 2004), but avoids sagebrush plants, probably because of their higher concentrations of plant secondary metabolites (Golob et al., 1999). Mendocino tuco-tucos may feed on and kill competing shrubs instead of sagebrush (the number of dead non-sage shrubs in disturbed areas is higher than in undisturbed ones: 3.57 and 1.43, respectively; Lara et al., 2007; N. Andino and C. E. Borghi, personal observations), which would promote increased density of sagebrush. C. talarum also reduces the competition stimulating plant biomass and changing plant species composition directly adjacent to the disturbances in a coastal grassland (Malizia et al., 2000). Galiano et al. (2014) suggested a positive effect of C. minutus on the abundance of grasses by relaxing competition in an area in a south Brazilian coastal plain. Furthermore, in our study site, Lara et al. (2007) found that the activity of mendocino tuco-tucos increased N (1000 ppm), K (410 ppm), and P (7.90 ppm) concentrations in bare soil in relation to undisturbed areas (N = 800 ppm, K = 340 ppm, P = 7.6 ppm), potentially facilitating sagebrush establishment and density in disturbed areas. In a coastal grassland, C. talarum positively affected Poa lanuginosa biomass by increasing mineralization rates (Malizia et al., 2000). Similar positive effects of fossorial rodents on plants have been found in the Spanish Pyrenees for Microtus duodecimcostatus which indirectly favors the abundance of Cirsium acaule, Sanguisorba minor, Meum athamanticum (Gómez-García et al., 1995), and Merendem montana (Gómez-García et al., 2004). Also, Cryptomys hottentottus hottentottus positively influenced Lolium multiflorum, Avena barbata, and Lessertia rigida by increasing soil nutrients (Hagenah and Bennett, 2013). Moreover, in a semi arid grassland in northern China, Artemisia spp. benefited from deposition of herbivore excreta on the soil, which increased nutrient concentration in patches. As a result, Artemisia spp. became the dominant species in this degraded grassland with heavy grazing (Wang et al., 2002).

TABLE 1

Effect of the mendocino tuco-tuco on population, individual, and reproduction levels of A. mendozana. Reported values represent results of Linear Mixed Models for explanatory variables describing variation in population (Density, Biomass), individual (Weight, Height) and reproductive (Flowers, Fruits, and Seeds) parameters and seed size in sagebrush plants, considering disturbance situation (DS) caused by mendocino tuco-tucos as fixed factor. We used Site and Season as random factors. Effects of fixed factor is analyzed using the likelihood ratio test (LRT).

t01_53.gif

FIGURE 1.

Effect of the mendocino tuco-tuco on population, individual and reproductive parameters of sagebrush. Values shown are mean (±SE) of plant density and biomass (A), plant weight and height (B); number of flowers and fruits per plant (C) and seed size (D) in disturbed and undisturbed areas by mendocino tuco-tucos.

f01_53.jpg

TABLE 2

Population, individual, and reproductive parameters of sagebrush in disturbed and undisturbed areas by mendocino tuco-tucos.

t02_53.gif

The reproduction of sagebrush was also correlated with disturbance by mendocino tuco-tucos. Specifically, flower production was similar in undisturbed and disturbed areas but the number of fruits and seeds increased in the latter areas. The positive influence on reproduction of sagebrush plants can be explained by direct and indirect activities of this subterranean herbivorous rodent. Some studies have found that the impact of herbivory on reproduction depends on which part of the plant is affected. For example, removal of the leaf does not affect reproduction, whereas removal of flowering structures does affect reproduction (Maschinski and Whitham, 1989; Paige, 1992; Louda and Potvin, 1995; Spotswood et al., 2002). The mendocino tuco-tuco, like C. australis and C. talarum, consumes the aerial vegetative fraction of plants rather than their reproductive fraction (Comparatore et al., 1995). Albanese et al. (2010) reported that leaves are the most representative item among plant parts (89.51%) in the mendocino tucotuco's diet in the lowland Monte desert. In our study population, the mendocino tuco-tuco consumes sagebrush when almost no other plants are available (Rosi et al., 2003; Lara et al., 2007), and when herbivory occurs on sagebrush, the tuco-tuco feeds on only the vegetative fraction (Comparatore et al., 1995). Additionally, defoliation may have differential effects on plant reproduction depending on when it occurs. Studies of the shrub Piper arieanum found that, when leaves were removed several months before flowering time, the plant suffered a large loss in reproductive output, but when the same treatment was administered just before flowering, there was no response (Marquis, 1984, 1992). Mendocino tuco-tucos mainly consume leaves of sagebrush plants during autumn (0.82%) and winter (4.40%; Rosi et al., 2003). Our study was performed during autumn just before sagebrush flowering, at a time when herbivory would likely have only minor effects on reproduction (Marquis, 1984; Maschinski and Whitham, 1989; Marquis, 1992; Spotswood et al., 2002).

The activities of mendocino tuco-tucos may also have indirect positive effects on sagebrush reproduction. Burrowing activities by mendocino tuco-tucos may affect soil structure and nutrient availability in the studied community (Lara et al., 2007). Nutrients, in particular N and P, are important to plant reproduction because they are required for flowering and fruit set. In our study area, mendocino tuco-tucos increase nutrient concentration in disturbed compared to undisturbed areas, generating a favorable environment for sagebrush plants, and potentially increasing reproductive output per square meter in disturbed areas. In disturbed areas, sagebrush produce more seeds and slightly larger seeds than in undisturbed areas. This could be a consequence of genetic differences in populations of A. mendozana. Genetic and/or environmental factors (including C. mendocinus disturbance) may lead to expression of different reproductive strategies at disturbed and undisturbed sites (Rapoport, 1982).

In conclusion, the results of both Lara et al. (2007) and the current study show an increase in the abundance of sagebrush and an improvement of its reproductive ability in areas affected by mendocino tuco-tucos in southern Puna. These results suggest that C. mendocinus acts as an ecosystem engineer in the Puna Desert. Even though our study design does not allow us to demonstrate unequivocally that the increase in the reproductive ability of sagebrush is caused by mendocino tuco-tucos, it enables us to propose a potentially important relationship between tuco-tucos and the population of Artemisia mendozana. The relationship involved seems to entail an effect on nutrient availability, plant cover, and reproductive success in sagebrush plants. We suggest further manipulative experimental studies to allow insight into the causal role of this subterranean rodent in this ecosystem.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the Reserva Privada Don Carmelo, particularly to Arturo Curatola, for allowing us to use the facilities during fieldwork. We want to sincerely thank Veronica Lahoz and Silvina Bongiovanni for their comments and suggestions on a first draft of our manuscript. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Nelly Horak assisted us with English editing. This research was partially funded by Universidad Nacional de San Juan, Argentina (through CICITCA grants E/339 to C. E. Borghi).

References Cited

1.

Albanese, S., Rodríguez, D., Dacar, M. A., and Ojeda, R., 2010: Use of resources by the subterranean rodent Ctenomys mendocinus (Rodentia, Ctenomydae), in the lowland Monte Desert, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments , 74: 458–463. Google Scholar

2.

Berke, S., 2010: Functional groups of ecosystem engineers: a proposed classification with comments on current issues. Integrative and Comparative Biology , 50(2): 147–157. Google Scholar

3.

Bolker, B., Brooks, M., Clark, C., Geange, S., Poulsen, J., Stevens, H., and White, J., 2008: General linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution , 24(3): 127–135. Google Scholar

4.

Borruel, N., Campos, C. M., and Borghi, C. E., 1998: Effects of herbivorous rodents (cavies and tuco- tucos) on a shrub community in the Monte Desert, Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments , 39: 33–37. Google Scholar

5.

Camin, S., and Madoery, L., 1994: Feeding behavior of the tuco-tuco (Ctenomys mendocinus): its modifications according to food availability and the changes in the harvest pattern and consumption. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural , 67: 257–263. Google Scholar

6.

Comparatore, V., Cid, S., and Busch, C., 1995: Dietary preferences of two sympatric subterranean rodent populations in Argentina. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural , 68: 197–206. Google Scholar

7.

Campos, C. M., Giannoni, S. M., and Borghi, C. E., 2001: Changes in Monte Desert plant communities induced by a subterranean mammal. Journal of Arid Environments , 47: 339–345. Google Scholar

8.

Eldridge, D. J., and James, A. I., 2009: Soil-disturbance by native animals plays a critical role in maintaining healthy Australian landscapes. Ecological Management & Restoration , 10: 27–34. Google Scholar

9.

Galiano, D., Kubiak, B., Overbeck, G., and de Freitas, T., 2014: Effects of rodents on plant cover, soil hardness, and soil nutrient content: a case study on tuco-tucos (Ctenomys minutus). Acta Theriologica , 59: doi  http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13364-014-0193-xGoogle Scholar

10.

Gómez-García, D., Borghi, C. E., and Giannoni, S., 1995: Vegetation differences caused by pine vole mound building in subalpine plant communities in the Spanish Pyrenees. Vegetatio , 117: 61–67. Google Scholar

11.

Golob, P., Moss, C., Dales, M., Fidgen, A., Evans, J., and Gudrups, I., 1999: The Use of Spices and Medicinais as Bioactive Protectants for Grains. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin 137. Google Scholar

12.

Gómez-García, D., Azorin, J., Giannoni, S. M., and Borghi, C. E., 2004: How does Merendero montana (L. ) Lange (Liliaceae) benefit from being consumed by mole-voles? Plant Ecology , 172: 173–181. Google Scholar

13.

Hagenah, N., and Bennett, N. C., 2013: Mole rats act as ecosystem engineers within a biodiversity hotspot, the Cape Fynbos. Journal of Zoology , 289(1): 19–26. Google Scholar

14.

Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Schachak, M., 1994: Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos , 69: 373–387. Google Scholar

15.

Kotliar, N. B., 2000: Application of the new keystone-species concept to prairie dogs: how well does it work? Conservation Biology , 14: 1715–1721. Google Scholar

16.

Lara, N., Sassi, R., and Borghi, C., 2007: Effect of herbivory and disturbances by tuco-tucos (Ctenomys mendocinus) on a plant community in the southern Puna Desert. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research , 39(1): 110–116. Google Scholar

17.

Louda, S. M., and Potvin, M. A., 1995: Effect of inflorescencefeeding insects on the demography and lifetime fitness of a native plant. Ecology , 76: 229–245. Google Scholar

18.

Malizia, A., Kittlein, M., and Busch, C., 2000: Influence of the subterranean herbivorous rodent Ctenomys talarum on vegetation and soil. International Journal of Mammalian Biology , 65: 172–182. Google Scholar

19.

Márquez, J., 1999: Las áreas protegidas de la Provincia de San Juan. Multequina , 8: 1–10. Google Scholar

20.

Marquis, R. J., 1984: Leaf herbivores decrease fitness of a tropical plant. Science , 226: 537–539. Google Scholar

21.

Marquis, R. J., 1992: A bite is a bite is a bite? Constraints on response to folivory in Piper arieanum (Piperaceae). Ecology , 73: 143–152. Google Scholar

22.

Martínez Carretero, E., 1995: La Puna Argentina: delimitación general y división en distritos florísticos. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica , 31: 27–44. Google Scholar

23.

Maschinski, J., and Whitham, T. B., 1989: The continuum of plant response to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability and timing. The American Naturalist , 40: 329–336. Google Scholar

24.

O'Neal, M. E., Landis, D. A., and Isaacs, R., 2002: An inexpensive, accurate method for measuring leaf area and defoliation through digital image analysis. Journal of Economy Entomology , 95(6): 1190–1194. Google Scholar

25.

Paige, K. N., 1992: Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: from mutualistic to antagonistic interactions. Ecology , 73: 2076–2085. Google Scholar

26.

Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., and R Core Team, 2016: nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–125,  http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlmeGoogle Scholar

27.

Power, M. E., Tilman, D., Estes, J. A., Menge, B. A., Bond, W J., Mills, L. S., Daily, G., Castilla, J. C., Lubchenco, J., and Paine, R. T., 1996: Challenges in the quest for keystones. BioScience , 46: 609–620. Google Scholar

28.

R Core Team, 2016: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.  https://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar

29.

Rapoport, E. H., 1982: Aerography: Geographical Strategies of Species. New York: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar

30.

Reboratti, C., 2006: Ecorregiones Puna y Altos Andes. In : Brown, A., Martinez Ortiz, U., Acerbi, M., and Corcuera, J. (eds.). La situación ambiental argentina 2005. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina; 32–51. Google Scholar

31.

Reichman, O.J., 2007: The influence of subterranean rodents on the environment. In Begall, S., Burda, H., and Schleich, C., (eds.). Subterranean Rodents News from Underground. Springer, 267–269. Google Scholar

32.

Reichman, O. J., and Seabloom, W. E., 2002: The role of pocket gophers as subterranean ecosystem engineers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution , 17: 44–49. Google Scholar

33.

Reig, O. A., Busch, C., Ortells, M., and Contreras, J. R., 1990: An overview of evolution, systematics, population biology, cytogenetics, molecular biology and speciation in Ctenomys. In Nevo, E., and Reig, O. A. (eds.). Evolution of Subterranean Mammals at the Organismal and Molecular Levels. New York: Alan R. Liss, 71–96. Google Scholar

34.

Root-Bernstein, M., and Ebensperger, L. A., 2012: Meta-analysis of the effects of small mammal disturbances on species diversity, richness and plant biomass. Austral Ecology , 38(3): 289–299. Google Scholar

35.

Rosi, M. I., Puig, S., Videla, F., and Roig, V., 1996: Size and structure of burrow systems of the fossorial rodent Ctenomys mendocinus in the piedmont of Mendoza Province, Argentina. Zeitschrift für Saügetierkunde , 61: 352–364. Google Scholar

36.

Rosi, M., Cona, M., Videla, F., Puig, S., Monge S., and Roig, V., 2003: Diet selection by the fossorial rodent Ctenomys mendocinus inhabiting an environment with low food availability (Mendoza, Argentina). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment Journal , 38(3): 159–166. Google Scholar

37.

Rosi, M. I., Cona, M. I., Roig, V. G., Massarini, A. I., and Verzi, D. H., 2005: Ctenomys mendocinus. Mammalian Species , 777: 1–6. Google Scholar

38.

Scion Corporation, 2000–2001: Scion Image for Windows, alpha version 4.0.3.2.  http://www.scioncorp.comGoogle Scholar

39.

Spotswood, E., Bradley, K., and Knops, J., 2002: Effects of herbivory on the reproductive effort of 4 prairie perennials. BMC Ecology , 2: 1–8. Google Scholar

40.

Tort, J., Campos, C., and Broghi, C., 2004: Herbivory by tucotucos (Ctenomys mendocinus) on shrubs in the upper limit of the Monte Desert (Argentina). Mammalia , 68(1): 15–25. Google Scholar

41.

Tort, J., Campos, C. M., and Borghi, C. E., 2007: Herbivory by tuco-tucos (Ctenomys mendocinus) on shrubs in the upper limit of the Monte Desert (Argentina). Mammalia , 68: 15–21. Google Scholar

42.

Van Nimwegen, R., Kretzer, J., and Cully, J., 2008: Ecosystem engineering by a colonial mammal: how prairie dogs structure rodent communities. Ecology , 89: 3298–3305. Google Scholar

43.

Wang, Y., Shiyomi, M., Tsuiki, M., Tsutsumi, M., Yu, Xueren, and Yi, Ruhan, 2002: Spatial heterogeneity of vegetation under different grazing intensities in the northwest Heilongjiang steppe of China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment , 90: 217–229. Google Scholar

44.

Wright, J. P., and Jones, C. G., 2006:The concept of organisms as ecosystem engineers ten years on: progress, limitations, and challenges. BioScience , 56(3): 203–209. Google Scholar

45.

Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., and Liu, J., 2003: Burrowing rodents as ecosystem engineers: the ecology and management of plateau zokors Myospalax fontanierii in alpine meadow ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau. Mammalian Review , 33: 284–294. Google Scholar

46.

Zuur, A. F., Leno, E. N. Walker, N.J., Saveliev, A. A., and Smith, G. M., 2009: Mixed effects models and extension in ecology with R. New York: Springer. Google Scholar
© 2016 Regents of the University of Colorado
Natalia Andino and Carlos E. Borghi "Occurrence of Ctenomys mendocinus in a High-Altitude Cold Desert: Effect on Density, Biomass, and Fitness of Sagebrush Plants," Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 49(1), 53-60, (1 February 2017). https://doi.org/10.1657/AAAR0015-061
Received: 31 August 2015; Accepted: 1 November 2016; Published: 1 February 2017
Back to Top