BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
6 March 2020 Pax islamita (Araneae: Zodariidae) as a new host of an acrocerid fly from Israel
Stano Pekár, Yael Lubin
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Records of interactions between acrocerid parasitoids (Diptera: Acroceridae) and their hosts are very scarce. Here we report a case of acrocerid fly (most likely Ogcodes sp.) parasitising zodariid spiders of the genus Pax from Israel. We describe the parasitoid development and possible host manipulation.

Spiders are a frequent prey of many vertebrate and invertebrate predators (e.g., Foelix 2011). They also fall prey to a number of hymenopteran and dipteran parasitoids which are often specialised on a certain foraging guild (e.g., Gauld & Dubois 2006, Korenko et al. 2014). While the former are often ectoparasitoids, the latter are mainly endoparasitoids, therefore very difficult to record. Among flies (Diptera), several families species that are known to exploit spiders, but the most important are acrocerids (Gillung & Borkent 2017).

Acrocerids (Acroceridae) are specialised internal parasitoids of spiders, mostly of cursorial species (Schlinger 1987). They are highly diversified, and therefore are specialised on certain prey guilds (Gillung & Borkent 2017), yet some species showed a higher trophic specificity (Cady et al. 1993). The biology of Acroceridae remains poorly known due to limited records, however, the overall course of life is known. The female disperses eggs on the vegetation. The hatched larvae then seek hosts and at the second instar inject themselves through the cuticle into a host (Nielsen et al. 1999). The remaining larval development occurs in the host body. The larva emerges from the host via the opisthosoma after some time and creates a puparium outside the host. The imago hatches within a few days (Cady et al. 1993).

Records of acrocerids come from 34 spider families, both from Mygalomorphae and Araneomorphae, and almost all spider clades (Gillung & Borkent 2017), but not from Zodariidae. In Israel zodariid spiders are locally abundant cursorial spiders (Pekár & Lubin 2003). There are 19 species belonging to six genera reported from Israel so far (World Spider Catalog 2019). Zodariid spiders have been rarely reported as hosts of parasitoids worldwide. Korenko et al. (2013) recently discovered two species of ichneumonid wasps' ecto-parasitising juveniles of Zodarion styliferum (Simon, 1870). Furthermore, Z. cyrenaicum Denis, 1935 was found to be ecto-parasitised by an ichneumonid wasp larva (Pekár et al. 2005). Lachesana sp. was observed to be hunted by a Pedinpompilus sp. wasp (Pekár unpublished); and Lutica has been reported to be parasited by a therevid fly (Ramirez 1995).

Here we report the first case of an acrocerid fly parasitoid that emerged from Pax spiders. We provide a description of the hatching from the host and possible host manipulation.

Material and methods

Pax islamita (Simon, 1873) spiders are medium sized (6–10 mm in adult stage), inhabiting leaf litter (Levy 1990). They were collected by hand under stones near the Adulam Nature Reserve (31.63419°N, 34.94669°E, 385 m a.s.l.), in central Israel, on 4. Apr. 2017. Specimens (n = 18, all juveniles) were placed individually into glass tubes (diameter 15 mm, 60 mm long) with a layer of gypsum on the bottom covered with a layer of sand. Spiders were kept at a room temperature of 24 °C and natural LD = 14:10 regime. One moth prey individual, Ephestia kuehniella Zeller, 1879, was offered to each spiders the next day.

Results

Out of 18 individuals collected, two juveniles constructed igloo-shaped retreats using sand grains within 24 hours after placing them onto sand (Fig. 1a). The other individuals constructed a retreat only 12 days after consuming prey, within which they moulted. These first two spiders did not accept prey (Ephestia moths), while all others (i.e. the non-parasitised spiders) did.

Two weeks later the first fly larva emerged from one individual via a dorsal opening on the opisthosoma (Fig. 1b). The larva produced a few strands of silk by which it was attached to the side of the retreat. The other larva (Fig. 1c) emerged three days later. Only the first larva managed to pupate nine days after emerging from the spider host (Fig. 1d). The other larva died six days after emergence as it did not manage to get rid of its own excrement. After seven days an adult male hatched and was killed and preserved (Fig. 1e, f). The parasitoid most likely belongs to the genus Ogcodes Latreille, 1796 (unfortunately, the material was lost when being sent to the specialist).

Discussion

The most interesting observation was the potential manipulation of the host behaviour. The parasitised individuals built a moulting retreat which was similar in construction to the retreats of non-parasitised individuals. However, the timing of building occurred much earlier than in the unparasitised individuals. So it seems that the fly larva triggered the spider to moult. Then the larva emerged inside the retreat, so it was used to shelter the larva and later the pupa during development. Additional observations are needed to support the occurrence of manipulation.

Fig. 1.

a. retreat built by an infected Pax individual; b. carcass of Pax. Notice the dorsal opening on opisthosoma used by larva of Ogcodes for emergence (arrow); c. larva, after emergence; d. puparium; e. adult male, dorsal side; f. adult male, lateral side. Scale = 5 mm

img-z2-2_05.jpg

Hymenopteran parasitoids often modify the behaviour of their spider hosts (e.g., Korenko et al. 2014, 2018). This occurs in many different forms (Thomas et al. 2005), but most frequently it includes construction of a retreat. In spiders infected by acrocerid larvae the observed changes have not been so prominent. For example, infected spiders ingested more food (and increased biomass) than uninfected ones but their growth rate was similar (Toft et al. 2012). The only obvious behavioural change was an induction of a premoulting behaviour prior to immediate emergence of the larva. This included construction of a dense silk cell (Cady et al. 1993).

The very low prevalence of parasitoids in zodariid spiders can be explained by their natural history. Zodariid spiders often hide in underground burrows or aboveground shelters, which most likely evolved as a form of primary defence against many enemies (Jocqué 1991). Furthermore, their nocturnal circadian activity provides additional protection from day-active predators, such as wasps. For example, Ramirez (1995) found a single case of parasitised Lutica spider out of a thousand individuals. Other records of zodariid parasitoids (see above) are also very rare.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank S. Korenko and O. Michálek for a help to collect Pax spiders in the field.

References

1.

Cady A, Leech R, Sorkin L, Stratton G & Caldwell M 1993 Acrocerid (Insecta: Diptera) life histories, behaviors, host spiders (Arachnida: Araneida), and distribution records. – Canadian Entomologist 125: 931–944 – https://doi.org/10.4039/ent125931-5 Google Scholar

2.

Foelix RF 2011 Biology of spiders. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, New York. 419 pp. Google Scholar

3.

Gauld ID & Dubois J 2006 Phylogeny of the Polysphincta group of genera (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae; Pimplinae), a taxonomic revision of spider ectoparasitoids. – Systematic Entomology 31: 529–564 – https://doi.org/10.4039/ent125931-5 Google Scholar

4.

Gillung JP & Borkent CJ 2017 Death comes on two wings: a review of dipteran natural enemies of arachnids. – Journal of Arachnology 45: 1–19 – https://doi.org/10.1636/joa-s-16-085.1 Google Scholar

5.

Jocqué R 1991 A generic revision of the spider family Zodariidae (Araneae). – Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 201: 1–160 Google Scholar

6.

Korenko S, Isaia M, Satrapová J & Pekár S 2014 Parasitoid genus-specific manipulation of orb-web host spiders (Araneae, Araneidae). – Ecological Entomology 39: 30–38 – https://doi.org/10.1111/een.12067 Google Scholar

7.

Korenko S, Schmidt S, Schwarz M, Gibson GAP & Pekár S 2013 Hymenopteran parasitoids of the ant-eating spider Zodarion styliferum (Simon) (Araneae, Zodariidae). – ZooKeys 262: 1–15 – https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.262.3857 Google Scholar

8.

Korenko S, Pekár S, Walter G, Korenková V, Hamouzová K, Kolářová M, Kysilková K, Spasojevic T & Klopfstein S 2018 One generalist or several specialist species? Wide host range and diverse manipulations of the hosts' web building behaviour in the true spider parasitoid Zatypota kauros (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). – Insect Conservation and Diversity 11: 587–599 – https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12307 Google Scholar

9.

Levy G 1990 The spider genera Palaestina, Trygetus, Zodarion and Ranops (Araneae, Zodariidae) in Israel with annotations on species of the Middle East. – Israel Journal of Zoology 38: 67–110 Google Scholar

10.

Nielsen BO, Funch P & Toft S 1999 Self-injection of a dipteran parasitoid into a spider. – Naturwissenschaften 86: 530–532 – https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050668 Google Scholar

11.

Pekár S & Lubin Y 2003 Habitats and interspecific associations of zodariid spiders in the Negev (Araneae: Zodariidae). – Israel Journal of Zoology 49: 255–267 – https://doi.org/10.1560/l5j8-456w-3cu5-ar6q Google Scholar

12.

Pekár S, Král J & Lubin YD 2005 Natural history and karyotype of some ant-eating zodariid spiders (Araneae, Zodariidae) from Israel. – Journal of Arachnology 33: 50–62 – https://doi.org/10.1636/s03-2 Google Scholar

13.

Ramirez MG 1995 Natural history of the spider genus Lutica (Araneae, Zodariidae). – Journal of Arachnology 23: 111–117 Google Scholar

14.

Schlinger EI 1987 The biology of Acroceridae (Diptera): true endoparasitoids of spiders. In: Nentwig W (ed.) Ecophysiology of spiders. Springer, Berlin. pp. 319–327 – https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71552-5_24 Google Scholar

15.

Thomas F, Adamo S & Moore J 2005 Parasitic manipulation: where are we and where should we go? – Behavioural Processes 68: 185–199 – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2004.06.010 Google Scholar

16.

Toft S, Nielsen BO & Funch P 2012 Parasitoid suppression and life-history modifications in a wolf spider following infection by larvae of an acrocerid fly. – Journal of Arachnology 40: 13–17 – https://doi.org/10.1636/p11-28.1 Google Scholar

17.

World Spider Catalog 2019 World spider catalog. Version 20.5. Natural History Museum, Bern. –  http://wsc.nmbe.ch Google Scholar
Stano Pekár and Yael Lubin "Pax islamita (Araneae: Zodariidae) as a new host of an acrocerid fly from Israel," Arachnologische Mitteilungen: Arachnology Letters 59(1), 5-7, (6 March 2020). https://doi.org/10.30963/aramit5902
Received: 3 October 2019; Accepted: 5 February 2020; Published: 6 March 2020
KEYWORDS
ant spider
host manipulation
host-parasitoid interaction
Ontogenetic development
Back to Top