BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 October 2013 No Association between Measures of Immunity in Nestling Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca)
Sonia González-Braojos, Rafael Ruiz-de-Castañeda & Juan Moreno
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Costs of immunity are widely believed to play an important role in life history evolution, but many studies of ecological immunology have considered only single aspects of immunity. Young of altricial birds, while dependent primarily on innate immunity and maternally derived antibodies for immune defence, have to develop all components of the immune system which could generate resource-based trade-offs among different arms and between growth and immunity. We conducted a study on nestling pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca in which we measured levels of natural antibodies (NAbs) and hemolysis, estimated serum immunoglobulin levels and obtained a specific measure of inflammation after inoculation of an antigen, phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). Thus we obtained independent estimates to explore the relationships among different arms of the immune system. We found that no immune variable measured was associated with any other variable at the individual and brood levels. This indicates that different aspects of immunity are independent and difficult to integrate in a general measure of immune response capacity in altricial nestling birds. We found that only NAbs was negatively associated with tarsus length at the age of 7 days, but not later. Thus, the evidence for resource-based trade-offs between nestling growth and immunity is weak in our study population.

© Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2013
Sonia González-Braojos and Rafael Ruiz-de-Castañeda & Juan Moreno "No Association between Measures of Immunity in Nestling Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca)," Annales Zoologici Fennici 50(5), 279-288, (1 October 2013). https://doi.org/10.5735/085.050.0503
Received: 4 December 2012; Accepted: 19 March 2013; Published: 1 October 2013
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top